Performance of B-CTMFD Detector Vs Ludlum 42-49B, Fuji NSN3 Detectors for Fission Energy Spectrum Neutron Detection with the Source within Lead/concrete Shielded Configurations

IF 0.5 Q4 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1115/1.4065853
Yusuke Ota, R. Taleyarkhan
{"title":"Performance of B-CTMFD Detector Vs Ludlum 42-49B, Fuji NSN3 Detectors for Fission Energy Spectrum Neutron Detection with the Source within Lead/concrete Shielded Configurations","authors":"Yusuke Ota, R. Taleyarkhan","doi":"10.1115/1.4065853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper presents the results of neutron detection efficiency and dosimetry between a borated centrifugally tensioned metastable fluid detector (B-CTMFD) vs He-3 Ludlum-42-49B, and, the Fuji NSN3 conducted using a Cf-252 neutron source behind lead and concrete shielding. MCNP code simulations accounted for 3-D effects and derived cpm/mic.Sv/h factors. Ludlum and NSN3 offer fixed sensitivity, but CTMFD offered on-demand sensitivity by varying its Pneg state between 0.3-0.7 MPa. The B-CTMFD demonstrated sensitivity of up to ~22x greater than Ludlum and 5x greater than NSN3, for 0-15 cm Pb shielding, and 0-30 cm concrete shielding; it overcomes the 60% detection penalty inherent in the NB-CTMF-designed only to detect fast-energy neutrons - as described in the companion (Part-1) paper. Unlike the NB-CTMFD, which used 100% DFP (C5H2F10), the B-CTMFD requires the use of an azeotropic mixture of DFP, methanol, and tri-methyl borate (TMB - using natural boron) in 80:4:16 proportion. The B-CTMFD was about 6 times more sensitive than NB-CTMFD under the most heavily shielded condition and taken together, also offered 2-energy bin neutron spectroscopic enablement, together with 22-5x higher absolute efficiency- relative sensitivity compared with the non-spectroscopic Ludlum (He-3) and NSN3 (methane-nitrogen) based detectors. From an intrinsic efficiency standpoint, the B-CTMFD operating at Pneg = 0.7 MPa state, demonstrated even superior ~103x higher intrinsic efficiency over Ludlum and NSN3.","PeriodicalId":16756,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4065853","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents the results of neutron detection efficiency and dosimetry between a borated centrifugally tensioned metastable fluid detector (B-CTMFD) vs He-3 Ludlum-42-49B, and, the Fuji NSN3 conducted using a Cf-252 neutron source behind lead and concrete shielding. MCNP code simulations accounted for 3-D effects and derived cpm/mic.Sv/h factors. Ludlum and NSN3 offer fixed sensitivity, but CTMFD offered on-demand sensitivity by varying its Pneg state between 0.3-0.7 MPa. The B-CTMFD demonstrated sensitivity of up to ~22x greater than Ludlum and 5x greater than NSN3, for 0-15 cm Pb shielding, and 0-30 cm concrete shielding; it overcomes the 60% detection penalty inherent in the NB-CTMF-designed only to detect fast-energy neutrons - as described in the companion (Part-1) paper. Unlike the NB-CTMFD, which used 100% DFP (C5H2F10), the B-CTMFD requires the use of an azeotropic mixture of DFP, methanol, and tri-methyl borate (TMB - using natural boron) in 80:4:16 proportion. The B-CTMFD was about 6 times more sensitive than NB-CTMFD under the most heavily shielded condition and taken together, also offered 2-energy bin neutron spectroscopic enablement, together with 22-5x higher absolute efficiency- relative sensitivity compared with the non-spectroscopic Ludlum (He-3) and NSN3 (methane-nitrogen) based detectors. From an intrinsic efficiency standpoint, the B-CTMFD operating at Pneg = 0.7 MPa state, demonstrated even superior ~103x higher intrinsic efficiency over Ludlum and NSN3.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
B-CTMFD 探测器与 Ludlum 42-49B、Fuji NSN3 探测器在铅/混凝土屏蔽配置中的裂变能谱中子源探测方面的性能比较
本文介绍了硼化离心张力可变流体探测器(B-CTMFD)与氦-3 Ludlum-42-49B 和富士 NSN3 之间的中子探测效率和剂量测定结果,后者使用铅和混凝土屏蔽后的 Cf-252 中子源进行探测。MCNP 代码模拟考虑了三维效应,并得出了 cpm/mic.Sv/h 因子。Ludlum 和 NSN3 提供了固定的灵敏度,但 CTMFD 通过在 0.3-0.7 MPa 之间改变其 Pneg 状态提供了按需灵敏度。在 0-15 厘米铅屏蔽和 0-30 厘米混凝土屏蔽条件下,B-CTMFD 的灵敏度比 Ludlum 高出约 22 倍,比 NSN3 高出 5 倍;它克服了 NB-CTMF 固有的 60% 检测损失,NB-CTMF 只设计用于检测快能中子--如配套论文(第一部分)所述。与使用 100% 二氟化碳(C5H2F10)的 NB-CTMFD 不同,B-CTMFD 需要使用二氟化碳、甲醇和硼酸三甲酯(TMB,使用天然硼)的共沸混合物,比例为 80:4:16。在屏蔽最严密的条件下,B-CTMFD 的灵敏度约为 NB-CTMFD 的 6 倍,同时还提供了 2 能级的中子分光功能,与基于非分光的 Ludlum(氦-3)和 NSN3(甲烷-氮)探测器相比,B-CTMFD 的绝对效率-相对灵敏度高出 22-5 倍。从内在效率的角度来看,在 Pneg = 0.7 MPa 状态下运行的 B-CTMFD 比 Ludlum 和 NSN3 的内在效率高出约 103 倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science is ASME’s latest title within the energy sector. The publication is for specialists in the nuclear/power engineering areas of industry, academia, and government.
期刊最新文献
Estimation of Turbulent Mixing Factor and Study of Turbulent Flow Structures in PWR Sub Channel by DNS Effect of Radial Neutron Reflector on the Characteristics of Nuclear Fuel Burn-up Wave in a Fast Neutron Energy Spectrum Multiplying Medium: A Consistent Parametric Approach Reviewing Welding Procedures - Checklists for Nuclear Power Systems Performance of NB-CTMFD detector vs Ludlum 42-49B, and Fuji NSN3 detectors for hard (Am-Be) and soft (Cf-252 fission) energy spectra neutron sources within lead/concrete shielded configurations Performance of B-CTMFD Detector Vs Ludlum 42-49B, Fuji NSN3 Detectors for Fission Energy Spectrum Neutron Detection with the Source within Lead/concrete Shielded Configurations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1