J. Pakpoor , R. Ellis , Y. Al-Tawarah , I. Bhide , K. Muthuswamy , R. Khamar , S.A. Taylor , C. Chew
{"title":"Differential outcomes at the Fellowship of the Royal College of Radiologists (FRCR) exams according to demographic and socioeconomic factors","authors":"J. Pakpoor , R. Ellis , Y. Al-Tawarah , I. Bhide , K. Muthuswamy , R. Khamar , S.A. Taylor , C. Chew","doi":"10.1016/j.crad.2024.07.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>BACKGROUND</h3><div>In the recent years, there has been an increase in the medical education literature showing that there are barriers to postgraduate exam success for some trainee groups compared to others. To date, there is little published data on whether these differences exist in UK radiology training. In this longitudinal cohort study, we aimed to evaluate the relationship between demographic and socioeconomic factors with Fellowship of the Royal College of Radiologists (FRCR) exam outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>MATERIALS AND METHODS</h3><div>A longitudinal retrospective cohort study of UK radiology trainees attempting the FRCR Part 1 examination between 2014 and 2021 <em>(n=1,860)</em>, with linked socioeconomic, demographic, and FRCR 2A and 2B results, was conducted. Chi-square tests assessed univariate associations between age, gender, ethnicity, and socioeconomic variables, with outcomes at each exam. Multivariate logistic regression analyses examined likelihood of FRCR success after adjusting for other variables.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>Among Part 1 candidates, 79.3% (1,465/1,850) passed at first attempt. Of these, 63.7% (600/940) subsequently passed 2A, and 77.2% (480/625) passed 2B. Significant associations with FRCR outcomes were seen with gender, ethnicity, and age (p < .005). Among socioeconomic variables, associations with FRCR outcomes were seen with parental education level, free school-meals, state-funded school (<.0.05 for Part 2A), and index of multiple deprivation (<0.05 for Part 1 and 2A). After adjusting for demographic factors, socioeconomic factors were not independently associated with exam success.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>Our study demonstrates that significant group-level differences exist at the FRCR examinations for candidates with protected characteristics (gender, ethnicity, and age) and other socioeconomic factors. These can act as barriers to career progression and may warrant interventions to support these groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10695,"journal":{"name":"Clinical radiology","volume":"79 12","pages":"Pages e1415-e1422"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009926024003465","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND
In the recent years, there has been an increase in the medical education literature showing that there are barriers to postgraduate exam success for some trainee groups compared to others. To date, there is little published data on whether these differences exist in UK radiology training. In this longitudinal cohort study, we aimed to evaluate the relationship between demographic and socioeconomic factors with Fellowship of the Royal College of Radiologists (FRCR) exam outcomes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A longitudinal retrospective cohort study of UK radiology trainees attempting the FRCR Part 1 examination between 2014 and 2021 (n=1,860), with linked socioeconomic, demographic, and FRCR 2A and 2B results, was conducted. Chi-square tests assessed univariate associations between age, gender, ethnicity, and socioeconomic variables, with outcomes at each exam. Multivariate logistic regression analyses examined likelihood of FRCR success after adjusting for other variables.
RESULTS
Among Part 1 candidates, 79.3% (1,465/1,850) passed at first attempt. Of these, 63.7% (600/940) subsequently passed 2A, and 77.2% (480/625) passed 2B. Significant associations with FRCR outcomes were seen with gender, ethnicity, and age (p < .005). Among socioeconomic variables, associations with FRCR outcomes were seen with parental education level, free school-meals, state-funded school (<.0.05 for Part 2A), and index of multiple deprivation (<0.05 for Part 1 and 2A). After adjusting for demographic factors, socioeconomic factors were not independently associated with exam success.
CONCLUSION
Our study demonstrates that significant group-level differences exist at the FRCR examinations for candidates with protected characteristics (gender, ethnicity, and age) and other socioeconomic factors. These can act as barriers to career progression and may warrant interventions to support these groups.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Radiology is published by Elsevier on behalf of The Royal College of Radiologists. Clinical Radiology is an International Journal bringing you original research, editorials and review articles on all aspects of diagnostic imaging, including:
• Computed tomography
• Magnetic resonance imaging
• Ultrasonography
• Digital radiology
• Interventional radiology
• Radiography
• Nuclear medicine
Papers on radiological protection, quality assurance, audit in radiology and matters relating to radiological training and education are also included. In addition, each issue contains correspondence, book reviews and notices of forthcoming events.