Sanjeev Singla, P. Bansal, Garima Dwivedi, Madhan Pranesh, Chanderbhan
{"title":"Comparison of operative outcome of open versus laparoscopic inguinal hernia in rural tertiary care hospital in Haryana: A randomized controlled study","authors":"Sanjeev Singla, P. Bansal, Garima Dwivedi, Madhan Pranesh, Chanderbhan","doi":"10.3126/ajms.v15i7.64059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Hernia surgery is one of the commonly done procedures in General surgery. A hernia is defined as an abnormal protrusion of an organ or tissue through a defect in its surrounding walls.\nAims and Objectives: Comparison of morbidity in terms of total analgesic usage, mean length of hospital stay, comparison among open and TEP repair of hernias in primary inguinal hernias among males.\nMaterial and Methods: This study was done on 80 patients with clinical diagnosis of primary inguinal hernia over a period of one year to compare the result of two surgeries, open lichenstein repair (n=40) and TEP repair (n=40).\nResults: Postoperative pain using VAS was found to be lower in patients having laparoscopic TEP hernia repair when compared to open lichenstein tension free repair (p <0.01). Operating time was observed to be more with TEP group with mean of 59 ± 17.02 minutes compared with open group which had mean of 44.92±12 minutes. Mean number of analgesic in open cases was 6.65 ± 1.81 whereas in case of TEP group it was 4.35±1.47 over a period of one month.\nConclusion: Lichtenstein tension free mesh hernioplasty still remains the gold standard operation done for inguinal hernia. TEP repair has proven to be superior in terms of perioperative hemorrhage and post-operative analgesia requirement. Study concluded that laparoscopic TEP repair of inguinal repair have a considerable clinical advantage over open hernia repair in terms of postoperative pain and analgesia requirement, hospital stay and postoperative complications.","PeriodicalId":8522,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v15i7.64059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Hernia surgery is one of the commonly done procedures in General surgery. A hernia is defined as an abnormal protrusion of an organ or tissue through a defect in its surrounding walls.
Aims and Objectives: Comparison of morbidity in terms of total analgesic usage, mean length of hospital stay, comparison among open and TEP repair of hernias in primary inguinal hernias among males.
Material and Methods: This study was done on 80 patients with clinical diagnosis of primary inguinal hernia over a period of one year to compare the result of two surgeries, open lichenstein repair (n=40) and TEP repair (n=40).
Results: Postoperative pain using VAS was found to be lower in patients having laparoscopic TEP hernia repair when compared to open lichenstein tension free repair (p <0.01). Operating time was observed to be more with TEP group with mean of 59 ± 17.02 minutes compared with open group which had mean of 44.92±12 minutes. Mean number of analgesic in open cases was 6.65 ± 1.81 whereas in case of TEP group it was 4.35±1.47 over a period of one month.
Conclusion: Lichtenstein tension free mesh hernioplasty still remains the gold standard operation done for inguinal hernia. TEP repair has proven to be superior in terms of perioperative hemorrhage and post-operative analgesia requirement. Study concluded that laparoscopic TEP repair of inguinal repair have a considerable clinical advantage over open hernia repair in terms of postoperative pain and analgesia requirement, hospital stay and postoperative complications.
背景:疝气手术是普外科常见的手术之一。疝气的定义是器官或组织通过其周围壁的缺陷异常突出:比较男性原发性腹股沟疝的总镇痛剂用量、平均住院时间、开放式疝修补术和 TEP 修补术的发病率:本研究对 80 名临床诊断为原发性腹股沟疝的患者进行了为期一年的研究,以比较两种手术(开放式 Lichenstein 修补术(40 人)和 TEP 修补术(40 人))的结果:结果:与开放式Lichenstein无张力修补术相比,腹腔镜TEP疝修补术患者的术后疼痛程度(VAS)更低(P <0.01)。腹腔镜 TEP 组的平均手术时间为(59±17.02)分钟,而开腹组的平均手术时间为(44.92±12)分钟。在一个月的时间里,开腹手术的平均镇痛次数为(6.65±1.81)次,而 TEP 组为(4.35±1.47)次:Lichtenstein无张力网疝成形术仍是治疗腹股沟疝的金标准手术。事实证明,TEP修补术在围手术期出血量和术后镇痛需求方面更胜一筹。研究得出结论,腹腔镜 TEP 腹股沟修补术在术后疼痛和镇痛需求、住院时间和术后并发症方面比开腹疝修补术具有相当大的临床优势。