Simplifying risk stratification for thyroid nodules on ultrasound: validation and performance of an artificial intelligence thyroid imaging reporting and data system

IF 1.5 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI:10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.07.006
Benjamin Wildman-Tobriner , Jichen Yang , Brian C. Allen , Lisa M. Ho , Chad M. Miller , Maciej A. Mazurowski
{"title":"Simplifying risk stratification for thyroid nodules on ultrasound: validation and performance of an artificial intelligence thyroid imaging reporting and data system","authors":"Benjamin Wildman-Tobriner ,&nbsp;Jichen Yang ,&nbsp;Brian C. Allen ,&nbsp;Lisa M. Ho ,&nbsp;Chad M. Miller ,&nbsp;Maciej A. Mazurowski","doi":"10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.07.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To validate the performance of a recently created risk stratification system (RSS) for thyroid nodules on ultrasound, the Artificial Intelligence Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (AI TI-RADS).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>378 thyroid nodules from 320 patients were included in this retrospective evaluation. All nodules had ultrasound images and had undergone fine needle aspiration (FNA). 147 nodules were Bethesda V or VI (suspicious or diagnostic for malignancy), and 231 were Bethesda II (benign). Three radiologists assigned features according to the AI TI-RADS lexicon (same categories and features as the American College of Radiology TI-RADS) to each nodule based on ultrasound images. FNA recommendations using AI TI-RADS and ACR TI-RADS were then compared and sensitivity and specificity for each RSS were calculated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Across three readers, mean sensitivity of AI TI-RADS was lower than ACR TI-RADS (0.69 vs 0.72, p &lt; 0.02), while mean specificity was higher (0.40 vs 0.37, p &lt; 0.02). Overall total number of points assigned by all three readers decreased slightly when using AI TI-RADS (5,998 for AI TI-RADS vs 6,015 for ACR TI-RADS), including more values of 0 to several features.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>AI TI-RADS performed similarly to ACR TI-RADS while eliminating point assignments for many features, allowing for simplification of future TI-RADS versions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51617,"journal":{"name":"Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology","volume":"53 6","pages":"Pages 695-699"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363018824001105/pdfft?md5=fe14e9d3f34bb79cf92b3bf4aa953afd&pid=1-s2.0-S0363018824001105-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363018824001105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To validate the performance of a recently created risk stratification system (RSS) for thyroid nodules on ultrasound, the Artificial Intelligence Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (AI TI-RADS).

Materials and methods

378 thyroid nodules from 320 patients were included in this retrospective evaluation. All nodules had ultrasound images and had undergone fine needle aspiration (FNA). 147 nodules were Bethesda V or VI (suspicious or diagnostic for malignancy), and 231 were Bethesda II (benign). Three radiologists assigned features according to the AI TI-RADS lexicon (same categories and features as the American College of Radiology TI-RADS) to each nodule based on ultrasound images. FNA recommendations using AI TI-RADS and ACR TI-RADS were then compared and sensitivity and specificity for each RSS were calculated.

Results

Across three readers, mean sensitivity of AI TI-RADS was lower than ACR TI-RADS (0.69 vs 0.72, p < 0.02), while mean specificity was higher (0.40 vs 0.37, p < 0.02). Overall total number of points assigned by all three readers decreased slightly when using AI TI-RADS (5,998 for AI TI-RADS vs 6,015 for ACR TI-RADS), including more values of 0 to several features.

Conclusion

AI TI-RADS performed similarly to ACR TI-RADS while eliminating point assignments for many features, allowing for simplification of future TI-RADS versions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
简化超声检查甲状腺结节的风险分层:人工智能甲状腺成像报告和数据系统的验证与性能
目的 验证最近创建的甲状腺结节超声风险分层系统(RSS)--人工智能甲状腺成像报告和数据系统(AI TI-RADS)的性能。所有结节均有超声图像,并进行了细针穿刺(FNA)。147 个结节为 Bethesda V 或 VI(可疑或诊断为恶性),231 个为 Bethesda II(良性)。三位放射科医生根据超声图像,按照 AI TI-RADS 词典(与美国放射学会 TI-RADS 的类别和特征相同)为每个结节分配特征。然后比较了 AI TI-RADS 和 ACR TI-RADS 的 FNA 建议,并计算了每种 RSS 的灵敏度和特异性。结果在三位读者中,AI TI-RADS 的平均灵敏度低于 ACR TI-RADS(0.69 vs 0.72,p < 0.02),而平均特异性较高(0.40 vs 0.37,p < 0.02)。使用 AI TI-RADS 时,三位读者分配的总点数略有减少(AI TI-RADS 为 5,998 点 vs ACR TI-RADS 为 6,015 点),其中包括更多特征值为 0 的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology
Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
113
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology covers important and controversial topics in radiology. Each issue presents important viewpoints from leading radiologists. High-quality reproductions of radiographs, CT scans, MR images, and sonograms clearly depict what is being described in each article. Also included are valuable updates relevant to other areas of practice, such as medical-legal issues or archiving systems. With new multi-topic format and image-intensive style, Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology offers an outstanding, time-saving investigation into current topics most relevant to radiologists.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Gender equality in radiology: 3 steps worth taking Breast Imaging: what women & healthcare professionals need to know #HeForShe in radiology: A toolkit for radiologists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1