Vinaya Bhandari, Ajith Sivadasan, Carolina Barnett-Tapia, Hans Katzberg, Vera Bril
{"title":"Using jitter analysis with concentric needle electrodes to assess disease status and treatment responses in myasthenia gravis","authors":"Vinaya Bhandari, Ajith Sivadasan, Carolina Barnett-Tapia, Hans Katzberg, Vera Bril","doi":"10.1016/j.cnp.2024.06.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study assesses the utility of jitter analysis with concentric needles to evaluate disease severity in myasthenia gravis (MG), correlate changes in jitter with clinical status as well as identify reasons for any discordance.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We performed a retrospective chart review of 82 MG patients and extracted data on demographics, MG subtype, antibody status, clinical scales, electrophysiology, and interventions at baseline and follow-up.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Baseline MGII scores correlated with jitter (r = 0.25, p = 0.024) and abnormal pairs (r = 0.24, p = 0.03). After 28 months, MGII scores correlated with jitter (r = 0.31, p = 0.006), abnormal pairs (r = 0.29, p = 0.009), and pairs with blocks (r = 0.35, p = 0.001). Changes in MGII scores correlated with changes in jitter (r = 0.35, p = 0.002), abnormal pairs (r = 0.27, p = 0.014), and pairs with blocks (r = 0.36, p = 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Concentric needle jitter analysis may have the potential to evaluate baseline and sequential disease severity in MG.</p></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><p>This study highlights the potential for improved MG patient care through precise assessment and management using concentric needle jitter analysis to improve the accuracy of MG diagnosis and monitoring of disease activity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45697,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology Practice","volume":"9 ","pages":"Pages 227-232"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467981X24000210/pdfft?md5=59272c4e18875518856fda2ac22a2f39&pid=1-s2.0-S2467981X24000210-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurophysiology Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467981X24000210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
This study assesses the utility of jitter analysis with concentric needles to evaluate disease severity in myasthenia gravis (MG), correlate changes in jitter with clinical status as well as identify reasons for any discordance.
Methods
We performed a retrospective chart review of 82 MG patients and extracted data on demographics, MG subtype, antibody status, clinical scales, electrophysiology, and interventions at baseline and follow-up.
Results
Baseline MGII scores correlated with jitter (r = 0.25, p = 0.024) and abnormal pairs (r = 0.24, p = 0.03). After 28 months, MGII scores correlated with jitter (r = 0.31, p = 0.006), abnormal pairs (r = 0.29, p = 0.009), and pairs with blocks (r = 0.35, p = 0.001). Changes in MGII scores correlated with changes in jitter (r = 0.35, p = 0.002), abnormal pairs (r = 0.27, p = 0.014), and pairs with blocks (r = 0.36, p = 0.001).
Conclusions
Concentric needle jitter analysis may have the potential to evaluate baseline and sequential disease severity in MG.
Significance
This study highlights the potential for improved MG patient care through precise assessment and management using concentric needle jitter analysis to improve the accuracy of MG diagnosis and monitoring of disease activity.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Neurophysiology Practice (CNP) is a new Open Access journal that focuses on clinical practice issues in clinical neurophysiology including relevant new research, case reports or clinical series, normal values and didactic reviews. It is an official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology and complements Clinical Neurophysiology which focuses on innovative research in the specialty. It has a role in supporting established clinical practice, and an educational role for trainees, technicians and practitioners.