A Comparative Study between Oxytocin Intravenous Bolus versus Oxytocin Intravenous Bolus and Infusion for Control of Blood Loss at Elective Cesarean Section

Bassiony Dabian, Eman Ahmed, Maha Mosaad, Mohammed Reda, Dalia Farouk
{"title":"A Comparative Study between Oxytocin Intravenous Bolus versus Oxytocin Intravenous Bolus and Infusion for Control of Blood Loss at Elective Cesarean Section","authors":"Bassiony Dabian, Eman Ahmed, Maha Mosaad, Mohammed Reda, Dalia Farouk","doi":"10.21608/ejhm.2024.363734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: One of the most crucial steps taken to stop postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is to take a uterotonic medication as soon after delivery. Objective: Our main objective was to determine which method was better for controlling intraoperative and early postoperative bleeding after an elective Cesarean section (CS) whether intravenous (IV) oxytocin bolus or oxytocin bolus with infusion. Patients and methods: Randomized controlled study that included 214 women who were scheduled for an elective Cesarean section after 38 weeks were divided into two equal groups and given an IV slow bolus oxytocin 5 IU and a placebo infusion (500 ml of normal saline over 4 hours) (Control group) or an IV slow bolus oxytocin 5 IU and an oxytocin infusion (40 IU in 500 ml of normal saline over 4 hours) (Study group). Following fetal delivery, all patients were administered the study medication. Results: The need for additional uterotonics was statistically higher in group A than in group B 26 (24.3%) versus 14 (13.1%). While the estimated blood loss was statistically insignificant between both groups (691.9 ± 233.6 ml in group A versus 543.1 ±179.4 ml in group B. Conclusion: Following IV oxytocin slow bolus during an elective Cesarean section, an additional oxytocin infusion was not superior to IV oxytocin slow bolus alone in reducing the operative blood loss but it may reduce the postoperative need for additional uterotonics","PeriodicalId":22467,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine","volume":"134 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejhm.2024.363734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: One of the most crucial steps taken to stop postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is to take a uterotonic medication as soon after delivery. Objective: Our main objective was to determine which method was better for controlling intraoperative and early postoperative bleeding after an elective Cesarean section (CS) whether intravenous (IV) oxytocin bolus or oxytocin bolus with infusion. Patients and methods: Randomized controlled study that included 214 women who were scheduled for an elective Cesarean section after 38 weeks were divided into two equal groups and given an IV slow bolus oxytocin 5 IU and a placebo infusion (500 ml of normal saline over 4 hours) (Control group) or an IV slow bolus oxytocin 5 IU and an oxytocin infusion (40 IU in 500 ml of normal saline over 4 hours) (Study group). Following fetal delivery, all patients were administered the study medication. Results: The need for additional uterotonics was statistically higher in group A than in group B 26 (24.3%) versus 14 (13.1%). While the estimated blood loss was statistically insignificant between both groups (691.9 ± 233.6 ml in group A versus 543.1 ±179.4 ml in group B. Conclusion: Following IV oxytocin slow bolus during an elective Cesarean section, an additional oxytocin infusion was not superior to IV oxytocin slow bolus alone in reducing the operative blood loss but it may reduce the postoperative need for additional uterotonics
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
催产素静脉注射与催产素静脉注射和输注控制择期剖腹产失血量的比较研究
背景:阻止产后出血(PPH)的最关键步骤之一是在分娩后尽快服用子宫收缩药。目的:我们的主要目的是确定哪种方法能更好地控制术中出血:我们的主要目的是确定在选择性剖宫产术(CS)后,静脉注射催产素栓剂和输注催产素栓剂哪种方法能更好地控制术中和术后早期出血。患者和方法:随机对照研究包括 214 名计划在 38 周后进行择期剖宫产的产妇,她们被分为两个相同的组,分别接受催产素 5 IU 缓慢静脉注射和安慰剂输注(500 毫升生理盐水,4 小时)(对照组)或催产素 5 IU 缓慢静脉注射和催产素输注(40 IU 加入 500 毫升生理盐水,4 小时)(研究组)。胎儿娩出后,所有患者都接受了研究药物治疗。研究结果据统计,A 组需要额外使用子宫收缩剂的人数为 26 人(24.3%),B 组为 14 人(13.1%)。两组的估计失血量在统计学上差异不大(A 组为 691.9 ± 233.6 毫升,B 组为 543.1 ± 179.4 毫升):在择期剖宫产术中静脉注射催产素慢栓后,额外输注催产素在减少手术失血量方面并不优于单独静脉注射催产素慢栓,但可减少术后对额外子宫收缩剂的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the Role of Chromohysteroscopy in Evaluation of Endometrial Pathology as a Cause of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding Preserving Approach in Management of Femur Giant Cell Tumor with Curettage and Bone Grafting in an Adult Patient: Case Report Effect of Adenotonsillectomy on Velopharyngeal Closure Patterns Association between Interleukin-21 Serum Level and IL-21 Genetic Polymorphism with the Cardiovascular Morbidity Risk in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients Effects of Early Immunonutrition on Patients with Pelvic Malignancies Receiving Radiotherapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1