Assessing the impact of health-care access on the severity of low back pain by country: a case study within the GBD framework

IF 15 1区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY Lancet Rheumatology Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1016/S2665-9913(24)00151-6
YiFan Wu MPH , Sarah Wulf Hanson PhD , Garland Culbreth PhD , Caroline Purcell MD , Prof Peter Brooks MD , Prof Jacek Kopec PhD , Prof Lyn March PhD , Prof Anthony D Woolf FRCP , Maja Pasovic MEd MA , Erin Hamilton MPH , Damian Santomauro PhD , Prof Theo Vos PhD
{"title":"Assessing the impact of health-care access on the severity of low back pain by country: a case study within the GBD framework","authors":"YiFan Wu MPH ,&nbsp;Sarah Wulf Hanson PhD ,&nbsp;Garland Culbreth PhD ,&nbsp;Caroline Purcell MD ,&nbsp;Prof Peter Brooks MD ,&nbsp;Prof Jacek Kopec PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Lyn March PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Anthony D Woolf FRCP ,&nbsp;Maja Pasovic MEd MA ,&nbsp;Erin Hamilton MPH ,&nbsp;Damian Santomauro PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Theo Vos PhD","doi":"10.1016/S2665-9913(24)00151-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) is key for policy making. Low back pain is the leading cause of disability in terms of years lived with disability (YLDs). Due to sparse data, a current limitation of GDB is that a uniform severity distribution is presumed based on 12-Item Short Form Health Survey scores derived from US Medical Expenditure Panel Surveys (MEPS). We present a novel approach to estimate the effect of exposure to health interventions on the severity of low back pain by country and over time.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We extracted treatment effects for ten low back pain interventions from the Cochrane Database, combining these with coverage data from the MEPS to estimate the hypothetical severity in the absence of treatment in the USA. Severity across countries was then graded using the Health Access and Quality Index, allowing estimates of averted and avoidable burden under various treatment scenarios.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>We included 210 trials from 36 Cochrane systematic reviews in the network analysis. The pooled effect sizes (measured as a standardised mean difference) for the most effective intervention classes were –0·460 (95% uncertainty interval –0·606 to –0·309) for a combination of psychological and physical interventions and –0·366 (–0·525 to –0·207) for surgery. Globally, access to treatment averted an estimated 17·6% (14·8 to 23·8) of the low back pain burden in 2020. If all countries had provided access to treatment at a level estimated for Iceland with the highest Health Access and Quality Index score, an extra 9·1% (6·4 to 11·2) of the burden of low back pain could be avoided. Even with full coverage of optimal treatment, a large proportion (65·9% [56·9 to 70·4]) of the low back pain burden is unavoidable.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>This methodology fills an important shortcoming in the GBD by accounting for low back pain severity variations over time and between countries. Assumptions of unequal treatment access increased YLD estimates in resource-poor settings, with a modest decrease in countries with higher Health Access and Quality Index scores. Nonetheless, the large proportion of unavoidable burden indicates poor intervention efficacy. This method, applicable to other GBD conditions, provides policy makers with insights into health gains from improved treatment and underscores the importance of investing in research for new interventions.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Queensland Health.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48540,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Rheumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":15.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665991324001516/pdfft?md5=8e167b58ec88f1ff73244d66e7292371&pid=1-s2.0-S2665991324001516-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665991324001516","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) is key for policy making. Low back pain is the leading cause of disability in terms of years lived with disability (YLDs). Due to sparse data, a current limitation of GDB is that a uniform severity distribution is presumed based on 12-Item Short Form Health Survey scores derived from US Medical Expenditure Panel Surveys (MEPS). We present a novel approach to estimate the effect of exposure to health interventions on the severity of low back pain by country and over time.

Methods

We extracted treatment effects for ten low back pain interventions from the Cochrane Database, combining these with coverage data from the MEPS to estimate the hypothetical severity in the absence of treatment in the USA. Severity across countries was then graded using the Health Access and Quality Index, allowing estimates of averted and avoidable burden under various treatment scenarios.

Findings

We included 210 trials from 36 Cochrane systematic reviews in the network analysis. The pooled effect sizes (measured as a standardised mean difference) for the most effective intervention classes were –0·460 (95% uncertainty interval –0·606 to –0·309) for a combination of psychological and physical interventions and –0·366 (–0·525 to –0·207) for surgery. Globally, access to treatment averted an estimated 17·6% (14·8 to 23·8) of the low back pain burden in 2020. If all countries had provided access to treatment at a level estimated for Iceland with the highest Health Access and Quality Index score, an extra 9·1% (6·4 to 11·2) of the burden of low back pain could be avoided. Even with full coverage of optimal treatment, a large proportion (65·9% [56·9 to 70·4]) of the low back pain burden is unavoidable.

Interpretation

This methodology fills an important shortcoming in the GBD by accounting for low back pain severity variations over time and between countries. Assumptions of unequal treatment access increased YLD estimates in resource-poor settings, with a modest decrease in countries with higher Health Access and Quality Index scores. Nonetheless, the large proportion of unavoidable burden indicates poor intervention efficacy. This method, applicable to other GBD conditions, provides policy makers with insights into health gains from improved treatment and underscores the importance of investing in research for new interventions.

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Queensland Health.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估各国医疗服务的获取对腰背痛严重程度的影响:GBD 框架内的案例研究
背景全球疾病、伤害和风险因素负担研究(GBD)是制定政策的关键。就残疾生活年数(YLDs)而言,腰背痛是导致残疾的主要原因。由于数据稀少,GDB 目前的一个局限性是根据美国医疗支出小组调查 (MEPS) 得出的 12 项简表健康调查得分来推测严重程度的均匀分布。方法我们从 Cochrane 数据库中提取了 10 种腰背痛干预措施的治疗效果,并将其与 MEPS 的覆盖数据相结合,以估算美国在没有治疗的情况下的假定严重程度。然后使用 "健康获得和质量指数 "对各国的严重程度进行分级,从而估算出在不同治疗方案下避免和可避免的负担。最有效干预类别的集合效应大小(以标准化平均差衡量)为:心理和物理干预组合为-0-460(95%不确定区间为-0-606至-0-309),手术为-0-366(-0-525至-0-207)。在全球范围内,2020 年获得治疗估计可避免 17-6%(14-8 至 23-8)的腰背痛负担。如果所有国家都能按照健康可及性和质量指数得分最高的冰岛的估计水平提供治疗,则可避免额外9-1%(6-4至11-2)的腰背痛负担。即使最佳治疗实现了全覆盖,腰背痛负担中的很大一部分(65-9% [56-9 至 70-4])也是不可避免的。治疗机会不平等的假设增加了资源贫乏国家的YLD估计值,而在健康获得和质量指数得分较高的国家,YLD估计值略有下降。尽管如此,不可避免的负担所占比例较大,表明干预效果不佳。这种方法适用于其他 GBD 条件,为政策制定者提供了从改善治疗中获得健康收益的见解,并强调了投资研究新干预措施的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lancet Rheumatology
Lancet Rheumatology RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
34.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
279
期刊介绍: The Lancet Rheumatology, an independent journal, is dedicated to publishing content relevant to rheumatology specialists worldwide. It focuses on studies that advance clinical practice, challenge existing norms, and advocate for changes in health policy. The journal covers clinical research, particularly clinical trials, expert reviews, and thought-provoking commentary on the diagnosis, classification, management, and prevention of rheumatic diseases, including arthritis, musculoskeletal disorders, connective tissue diseases, and immune system disorders. Additionally, it publishes high-quality translational studies supported by robust clinical data, prioritizing those that identify potential new therapeutic targets, advance precision medicine efforts, or directly contribute to future clinical trials. With its strong clinical orientation, The Lancet Rheumatology serves as an independent voice for the rheumatology community, advocating strongly for the enhancement of patients' lives affected by rheumatic diseases worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Barriers to CAR T-cell therapy in rheumatology. Effect of apremilast on hand and whole-body MRI assessments of inflammation in patients with psoriatic arthritis (MOSAIC): a phase 4, multicentre, single-arm, open-label study. Digital remote monitoring in rheumatology: using health economics to support wider adoption. Patient-initiated follow-up supported by asynchronous telemedicine versus usual care in spondyloarthritis (TeleSpA-study): a randomised controlled trial of clinical and cost-effectiveness. Facial ulcerations in anti-MDA5 dermatomyositis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1