Optimal testing time for cerebral heterotopia formation in the rat comparative thyroid assay, a downstream indicator for perinatal thyroid hormone insufficiency

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PATHOLOGY Journal of Toxicologic Pathology Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1293/tox.2024-0004
Keiko OGATA, Hidenori SUTO, Akira SATO, Keiko MAEDA, Kenta MINAMI, Naruto TOMIYAMA, Tadashi KOSAKA, Hitoshi HOJO, Naofumi TAKAHASHI, Hiroaki AOYAMA, Tomoya YAMADA
{"title":"Optimal testing time for cerebral heterotopia formation in the rat comparative thyroid assay, a downstream indicator for perinatal thyroid hormone insufficiency","authors":"Keiko OGATA, Hidenori SUTO, Akira SATO, Keiko MAEDA, Kenta MINAMI, Naruto TOMIYAMA, Tadashi KOSAKA, Hitoshi HOJO, Naofumi TAKAHASHI, Hiroaki AOYAMA, Tomoya YAMADA","doi":"10.1293/tox.2024-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"</p><p>In a past study, we proposed a modified Comparative Thyroid Assay (CTA) with additional examinations of brain thyroid hormone (TH) concentrations and brain histopathology but with smaller group sizes. The results showed that the modified CTA in Sprague Dawley rats detected 10 ppm 6-propylthiouracil (6-PTU)-induced significant suppressions of serum/brain TH concentrations in offspring. To confirm the reliability of qualitative brain histopathology and identify the optimal testing time for heterotopia (a cluster of ectopic neurons) in the modified CTA, brain histopathology together with serum/brain TH concentrations were assessed in GD20 fetuses and PND2, 4, 21, and 28 pups using a similar study protocol but with a smaller number of animals (N=3–6/group/time). Significant hypothyroidism was observed and brain histopathology revealed cerebral heterotopia formation in PND21 and PND28 pups, with likely precursor findings in PND2 and PND4 pups but not in GD20 fetuses. This study confirmed that the optimal testing time for cerebral heterotopia in rat CTA was PND21 and thereafter. These findings suggest that cerebral heterotopia assessment at appropriate times may be a useful alternative to the original CTA design. </p>\n<p></p>","PeriodicalId":17437,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Toxicologic Pathology","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Toxicologic Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1293/tox.2024-0004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a past study, we proposed a modified Comparative Thyroid Assay (CTA) with additional examinations of brain thyroid hormone (TH) concentrations and brain histopathology but with smaller group sizes. The results showed that the modified CTA in Sprague Dawley rats detected 10 ppm 6-propylthiouracil (6-PTU)-induced significant suppressions of serum/brain TH concentrations in offspring. To confirm the reliability of qualitative brain histopathology and identify the optimal testing time for heterotopia (a cluster of ectopic neurons) in the modified CTA, brain histopathology together with serum/brain TH concentrations were assessed in GD20 fetuses and PND2, 4, 21, and 28 pups using a similar study protocol but with a smaller number of animals (N=3–6/group/time). Significant hypothyroidism was observed and brain histopathology revealed cerebral heterotopia formation in PND21 and PND28 pups, with likely precursor findings in PND2 and PND4 pups but not in GD20 fetuses. This study confirmed that the optimal testing time for cerebral heterotopia in rat CTA was PND21 and thereafter. These findings suggest that cerebral heterotopia assessment at appropriate times may be a useful alternative to the original CTA design.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大鼠比较甲状腺测定中脑异位形成的最佳测试时间--围产期甲状腺激素不足的下游指标
在过去的一项研究中,我们提出了一种改良的比较甲状腺测定法(CTA),该方法增加了对脑甲状腺激素(TH)浓度和脑组织病理学的检查,但分组规模较小。结果表明,在 Sprague Dawley 大鼠中使用改进的 CTA,可检测到 10 ppm 6-丙基硫脲嘧啶(6-PTU)诱导的后代血清/脑甲状腺激素浓度的显著抑制作用。为了证实定性脑组织病理学的可靠性并确定改良 CTA 中异位(异位神经元群)的最佳检测时间,我们采用类似的研究方案,但动物数量较少(N=3-6/组/次),对 GD20 胎儿和 PND2、4、21 和 28 幼鼠的脑组织病理学以及血清/脑 TH 浓度进行了评估。在 PND21 和 PND28 的幼崽中观察到明显的甲状腺功能减退,脑组织病理学显示有脑异位形成,PND2 和 PND4 的幼崽可能有前驱症状,但在 GD20 胎儿中没有发现。这项研究证实,大鼠 CTA 脑异位的最佳检测时间是 PND21 及以后。这些研究结果表明,在适当的时间进行大脑异位症评估可能是原始 CTA 设计的有效替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Toxicologic Pathology
Journal of Toxicologic Pathology PATHOLOGY-TOXICOLOGY
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
22
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: JTP is a scientific journal that publishes original studies in the field of toxicological pathology and in a wide variety of other related fields. The main scope of the journal is listed below. Administrative Opinions of Policymakers and Regulatory Agencies Adverse Events Carcinogenesis Data of A Predominantly Negative Nature Drug-Induced Hematologic Toxicity Embryological Pathology High Throughput Pathology Historical Data of Experimental Animals Immunohistochemical Analysis Molecular Pathology Nomenclature of Lesions Non-mammal Toxicity Study Result or Lesion Induced by Chemicals of Which Names Hidden on Account of the Authors Technology and Methodology Related to Toxicological Pathology Tumor Pathology; Neoplasia and Hyperplasia Ultrastructural Analysis Use of Animal Models.
期刊最新文献
Metabolism and effects of acetoaceto-o-toluidine in the urinary bladder of humanized-liver mice High mobility group box1 as a danger signal inducing the infiltration of neutrophils and macrophages in thioacetamide-induced rat liver injury Lymphangiomas with the presence of erythrocytes in mesenteric lymph nodes of Wistar Hannover rats The role of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species in initiating mitochondrial damage and inflammation in wasp-venom-induced acute kidney injury Histopathology of spontaneous lesions in FVB/N mice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1