Factors Affecting the Activation and Appearances of Epileptiform Abnormalities in Routine Electroencephalography by Different Provocation Methods.

IF 0.6 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Annals of African Medicine Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-01 DOI:10.4103/aam.aam_60_23
Saima Nazish
{"title":"Factors Affecting the Activation and Appearances of Epileptiform Abnormalities in Routine Electroencephalography by Different Provocation Methods.","authors":"Saima Nazish","doi":"10.4103/aam.aam_60_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to observe the effects of various clinical factors on the activation and appearance of epileptiform abnormalities (EAs) in routine electroencephalography (rEEG) by different provocation methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational study involved a review of 136 patients presented for EEG recording due to various indications and their EEG showing EAs during various provocation methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Generalized spike-wave discharges (GSWDs) were the most frequent activated epileptiform pattern observed in, 81 (59.1%) recordings. This pattern was seen mainly in females 49 (P = 0.00), in patients with generalized seizures 48 (P = 0.00), in prolonged EEG records 3 (P = 0.03), and in both genetic 35 (P = 0.00) and lesional epilepsies 21 (P = 0.00). Focal sharp waves with bilateral synchrony (FSWSBS) were the most activated ictal pattern (P = 0.00). Ictal EAs after hyperventilation (HV) (P = 0.03) and intermittent photic stimulation (IPS) (P = 0.01) were mainly observed in patients with uncontrolled seizures (P = 0.00), and immune-mediated epilepsy (P = 0.02). Females sex (odds ratio [OR]: 1.33, confidence interval [CI]: 0.6-2.6; P = 0.25), bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (OR: 1.17, CI: 0.5-2.4; P = 0.31) and lesional epilepsies (OR: 1.45, CI: 0.7-2.9; P = 0.20) had risk of activation of EAs by provocation methods; however this risk was not statistically significant. While sleep deprivation (SD) (OR: 6.33, CI: 2.2-18.2; P = 0.00), nonrapid eye movement sleep (NREM) (OR: 2.41, CI: 1.0-5.4; P = 0.00), and prolong EEG recording (OR: 1.91, CI: 0.9-3.9; P = 0.04) were leading to a statistically significant risk of activation and appearances of EAs due to provocation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Different provocation methods can activate and augment the variety of EEG patterns of diverse clinical significance. Detection of activated ictal EAs is dependent on various patient factors, including seizure control, and the provocation method applied. Further larger prospective cohort studies with adequate sample sizes are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":7938,"journal":{"name":"Annals of African Medicine","volume":"23 2","pages":"160-168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11210735/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of African Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aam.aam_60_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to observe the effects of various clinical factors on the activation and appearance of epileptiform abnormalities (EAs) in routine electroencephalography (rEEG) by different provocation methods.

Methods: This observational study involved a review of 136 patients presented for EEG recording due to various indications and their EEG showing EAs during various provocation methods.

Results: Generalized spike-wave discharges (GSWDs) were the most frequent activated epileptiform pattern observed in, 81 (59.1%) recordings. This pattern was seen mainly in females 49 (P = 0.00), in patients with generalized seizures 48 (P = 0.00), in prolonged EEG records 3 (P = 0.03), and in both genetic 35 (P = 0.00) and lesional epilepsies 21 (P = 0.00). Focal sharp waves with bilateral synchrony (FSWSBS) were the most activated ictal pattern (P = 0.00). Ictal EAs after hyperventilation (HV) (P = 0.03) and intermittent photic stimulation (IPS) (P = 0.01) were mainly observed in patients with uncontrolled seizures (P = 0.00), and immune-mediated epilepsy (P = 0.02). Females sex (odds ratio [OR]: 1.33, confidence interval [CI]: 0.6-2.6; P = 0.25), bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (OR: 1.17, CI: 0.5-2.4; P = 0.31) and lesional epilepsies (OR: 1.45, CI: 0.7-2.9; P = 0.20) had risk of activation of EAs by provocation methods; however this risk was not statistically significant. While sleep deprivation (SD) (OR: 6.33, CI: 2.2-18.2; P = 0.00), nonrapid eye movement sleep (NREM) (OR: 2.41, CI: 1.0-5.4; P = 0.00), and prolong EEG recording (OR: 1.91, CI: 0.9-3.9; P = 0.04) were leading to a statistically significant risk of activation and appearances of EAs due to provocation.

Conclusion: Different provocation methods can activate and augment the variety of EEG patterns of diverse clinical significance. Detection of activated ictal EAs is dependent on various patient factors, including seizure control, and the provocation method applied. Further larger prospective cohort studies with adequate sample sizes are warranted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响常规脑电图中不同诱发方法激活和出现癫痫样异常的因素。
研究目的本研究旨在观察各种临床因素对不同激惹方法下常规脑电图(rEEG)中癫痫样异常(EAs)的激活和出现的影响:这项观察性研究回顾了136例因各种适应症而接受脑电图记录的患者,以及他们在不同激起方法下出现EA的脑电图:结果:在81次(59.1%)记录中观察到的激活痫样形态中,最常见的是泛发性尖波放电(GSWD)。这种模式主要见于女性 49 (P = 0.00)、全身性癫痫发作患者 48 (P = 0.00)、延长的脑电图记录 3 (P = 0.03)、遗传性癫痫 35 (P = 0.00) 和病变性癫痫 21 (P = 0.00)。双侧同步的局灶性尖波(FSWSBS)是最活跃的发作模式(P = 0.00)。过度换气(HV)(P = 0.03)和间歇性光刺激(IPS)(P = 0.01)后的间歇性 EAs 主要见于癫痫发作不受控制的患者(P = 0.00)和免疫介导的癫痫患者(P = 0.02)。女性性别(几率比 [OR]:1.33,置信区间 [CI]:0.6-2.6;P = 0.25)、双侧强直阵挛发作(OR:1.17,CI:0.5-2.4;P = 0.31)和病变性癫痫(OR:1.45,CI:0.7-2.9;P = 0.20)有通过激惹法激活 EAs 的风险,但这一风险在统计学上并不显著。而睡眠剥夺(SD)(OR:6.33,CI:2.2-18.2;P = 0.00)、非快速眼动睡眠(NREM)(OR:2.41,CI:1.0-5.4;P = 0.00)和长时间脑电图记录(OR:1.91,CI:0.9-3.9;P = 0.04)会导致EAs因激惹而被激活和出现的风险,具有统计学意义:结论:不同的诱发方法可激活和增强各种具有不同临床意义的脑电图模式。激活的发作性 EAs 的检测取决于患者的各种因素,包括发作控制情况和所采用的诱发方法。有必要进一步开展样本量充足的大型前瞻性队列研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of African Medicine
Annals of African Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Annals of African Medicine is published by the Usmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital, Sokoto, Nigeria and the Annals of African Medicine Society. The Journal is intended to serve as a medium for the publication of research findings in the broad field of Medicine in Africa and other developing countries, and elsewhere which have relevance to Africa. It will serve as a source of information on the state of the art of Medicine in Africa, for continuing education for doctors in Africa and other developing countries, and also for the publication of meetings and conferences. The journal will publish articles I any field of Medicine and other fields which have relevance or implications for Medicine.
期刊最新文献
A Quasi-Experimental Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Hot Water Footbath Therapy on Quality of Sleep among Cancer Patients. Awareness of Peptic Ulcer Disease among the General Population in Al-Ahsa. Bilateral Endogenous Streptococcus mitis Endophthalmitis Following Dental Implant: A Case Report and Literature Review. Before Venous Sinus Thrombosis is Attributed to Hyperhomocysteinemia, Alternative Causes Must be Thoroughly Ruled Out. Bilateral Corneal Endotheliitis Following Corneal Cross-linking with Riboflavin and Ultraviolet A.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1