Phenotypic and genotypic risk factors for invasive melanoma by sex and body site.

IF 11 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY British Journal of Dermatology Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1093/bjd/ljae297
Catherine M Olsen, Nirmala Pandeya, Rachel E Neale, Matthew H Law, David C Whiteman
{"title":"Phenotypic and genotypic risk factors for invasive melanoma by sex and body site.","authors":"Catherine M Olsen, Nirmala Pandeya, Rachel E Neale, Matthew H Law, David C Whiteman","doi":"10.1093/bjd/ljae297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cutaneous melanoma incidence varies consistently across body sites between men and women, but the underlying causes of these differences remain unclear. To date, no prospective studies have examined risk factors for melanoma separately for men and women according to body site.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to examine the association between identified constitutional, genetic and environmental risk factors for invasive melanoma of different body sites among men and women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared the association between constitutional, genetic and environmental risk factors for invasive melanoma on different body sites separately for men and women in a population-based prospective cohort study of 17 774 men and 21 070 women aged between 40 and 69 years who were residents of Queensland, Australia at baseline in 2011. Participants were followed until December 2021. We examined risk factors including hair colour, tanning ability, naevus density and proxies for high cumulative sun exposure, all self-reported at baseline. We also examined polygenic risk score (PRS) derived from summary statistics from a melanoma genome-wide association study meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During a median 10.4 years of follow-up, 455 men and 331 women developed an incident invasive melanoma; the mean age at diagnosis was lower in women than in men (62.6 vs. 65.0 years). The most common body site was the trunk in men (45.1%), and the upper (36.8%) and lower limbs (27.4%) in women. High naevus density and proxy measures of high cumulative sun exposure were similarly associated with melanoma at all sites in men and women. In both sexes, high genetic risk was associated with melanoma on all body sites except the head and neck. We observed differences between men and women in the association between PRS and melanoma of the trunk [highest vs. lowest tertile of PRS: hazard ratio (HR) 2.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.64-4.69 for men; HR 1.55, 95% CI 0.63-3.80 for women] and nonsignificant but large differences for the lower limbs (HR 5.25, 95% CI 1.80-15.27 for men; HR 1.75, 95% CI 0.88-3.47 for women).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While there are a number of potential explanations for these findings, this raises the possibility that genetic factors other than those related to pigmentation and naevus phenotypes may play a role in the predilection for melanoma to arise on different sites in men and women.</p>","PeriodicalId":9238,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":"914-923"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljae297","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cutaneous melanoma incidence varies consistently across body sites between men and women, but the underlying causes of these differences remain unclear. To date, no prospective studies have examined risk factors for melanoma separately for men and women according to body site.

Objectives: We aimed to examine the association between identified constitutional, genetic and environmental risk factors for invasive melanoma of different body sites among men and women.

Methods: We compared the association between constitutional, genetic and environmental risk factors for invasive melanoma on different body sites separately for men and women in a population-based prospective cohort study of 17 774 men and 21 070 women aged between 40 and 69 years who were residents of Queensland, Australia at baseline in 2011. Participants were followed until December 2021. We examined risk factors including hair colour, tanning ability, naevus density and proxies for high cumulative sun exposure, all self-reported at baseline. We also examined polygenic risk score (PRS) derived from summary statistics from a melanoma genome-wide association study meta-analysis.

Results: During a median 10.4 years of follow-up, 455 men and 331 women developed an incident invasive melanoma; the mean age at diagnosis was lower in women than in men (62.6 vs. 65.0 years). The most common body site was the trunk in men (45.1%), and the upper (36.8%) and lower limbs (27.4%) in women. High naevus density and proxy measures of high cumulative sun exposure were similarly associated with melanoma at all sites in men and women. In both sexes, high genetic risk was associated with melanoma on all body sites except the head and neck. We observed differences between men and women in the association between PRS and melanoma of the trunk [highest vs. lowest tertile of PRS: hazard ratio (HR) 2.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.64-4.69 for men; HR 1.55, 95% CI 0.63-3.80 for women] and nonsignificant but large differences for the lower limbs (HR 5.25, 95% CI 1.80-15.27 for men; HR 1.75, 95% CI 0.88-3.47 for women).

Conclusions: While there are a number of potential explanations for these findings, this raises the possibility that genetic factors other than those related to pigmentation and naevus phenotypes may play a role in the predilection for melanoma to arise on different sites in men and women.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
按性别和身体部位划分的侵袭性黑色素瘤表型和基因型风险因素。
背景:不同身体部位的皮肤黑色素瘤发病率在男性和女性之间存在一致的差异,但造成这种差异的根本原因仍不清楚。迄今为止,还没有前瞻性研究根据身体部位对男女黑色素瘤的风险因素分别进行研究:在一项基于人群的前瞻性队列研究中,我们比较了男性和女性不同身体部位的侵袭性黑色素瘤的体质、遗传和环境风险因素之间的关联,研究对象为澳大利亚昆士兰州的 17,774 名男性和 21,070 名女性居民,他们的年龄在 40 岁至 69 岁之间,基线时间为 2011 年。我们对风险因素进行了研究,包括头发颜色、日晒能力、痣密度和高累积日晒代用指标,所有这些都是基线时的自我报告。我们还研究了根据黑色素瘤全基因组关联研究荟萃分析的汇总统计得出的多基因风险评分(PRS):在中位 10.4 年的随访期间,455 名男性和 331 名女性患上了侵袭性黑色素瘤;女性的平均确诊年龄低于男性(分别为 62.6 岁和 65.0 岁)。最常见的身体部位是男性的躯干(45.1%)、女性的上肢(36.8%)和下肢(27.4%)。痣密度高和累积日晒时间长的替代指标同样与男性和女性所有部位的黑色素瘤有关。在男性和女性中,高遗传风险与除头颈部以外的所有身体部位的黑色素瘤都有关联。我们观察到男性和女性的 PRS 与躯干黑色素瘤的相关性存在差异(PRS 的最高三分位数与最低三分位数:男性 HR 为 2.78,95% CI 为 1.64-4.69;女性 HR 为 1.55,95% CI 为 0.63-3.80),下肢的差异不显著但很大(男性 HR 为 5.25,95% CI 为 1.80-15.27;女性 HR 为 1.75,95% CI 为 0.88-3.47):虽然这些发现有多种可能的解释,但这也提出了一种可能性,即除了与色素沉着和痣表型有关的遗传因素外,其他遗传因素也可能是导致黑色素瘤偏爱发生在不同性别不同部位的原因之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Dermatology
British Journal of Dermatology 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
3.90%
发文量
1062
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Dermatology (BJD) is committed to publishing the highest quality dermatological research. Through its publications, the journal seeks to advance the understanding, management, and treatment of skin diseases, ultimately aiming to improve patient outcomes.
期刊最新文献
Drug Survival and Safety of Biosimilars Compared with Originator Adalimumab for Psoriasis: A Multinational Cohort Study. R(+) Propranolol decreases lipid accumulation in haemangioma-derived stem cells. Tailored Bioengineering and Nanomedicine Strategies for Sex-Specific Healing of Chronic Wounds. Personalized sun protection equation: Dermatology + Psychology = XPAND. Cytokeratin 17 expression is commonly observed in keratinocytic skin tumours and controls tissue homeostasis impacting human papillomavirus protein expression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1