Accounting for time-varying exposures and covariates in the relationship between obesity and diabetes: analysis using parametric g-formula.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1136/jech-2023-221882
Boyoung Park, Junghyun Yoon, Thi Xuan Mai Tran
{"title":"Accounting for time-varying exposures and covariates in the relationship between obesity and diabetes: analysis using parametric g-formula.","authors":"Boyoung Park, Junghyun Yoon, Thi Xuan Mai Tran","doi":"10.1136/jech-2023-221882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies investigating the association between obesity and diabetes often did not consider the role of time-varying covariates affected by previous obesity status. This study quantified the association between obesity and diabetes using parametric g-formula.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 8924 participants without diabetes from the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study-Ansan and Ansung study(2001-2002)-with up to the seventh biennial follow-up data from 2015 to 2016. Obesity status was categorised as normal (body mass index (BMI) <23.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), overweight (23.5-24.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), obese 1 (25.0-27.4 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) and obese 2 (≥27.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). Hazard ratios (HRs) comparing baseline or time-varying obesity status were estimated using Cox models, whereas risk ratio (RR) was estimated using g-formula.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Cox model for baseline obesity status demonstrated an increased risk of diabetes in overweight (HR 1.85; 95% CI=1.48-2.31), obese 1 (2.40; 1.97-2.93) and obese 2 (3.65; 2.98-4.47) statuses than that in normal weight status. Obesity as a time-varying exposure with time-varying covariates had HRs of 1.31 (1.07-1.60), 1.55 (1.29-1.86) and 2.58 (2.14-3.12) for overweight, obese 1 and obese 2 statuses. Parametric g-formula comparing if everyone had been in each obesity category versus normal over 15 years showed increased associations of RRs of 1.37 (1.34-1.40), 1.78 (1.76-1.80) and 2.42 (2.34-2.50).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher BMI classification category was associated with increased risk of diabetes after accounting for time-varying covariates using g-formula. The results from g-formula were smaller than when considering baseline obesity status only but comparable with the results from time-varying Cox model.</p>","PeriodicalId":54839,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health","volume":" ","pages":"729-736"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2023-221882","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous studies investigating the association between obesity and diabetes often did not consider the role of time-varying covariates affected by previous obesity status. This study quantified the association between obesity and diabetes using parametric g-formula.

Methods: We included 8924 participants without diabetes from the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study-Ansan and Ansung study(2001-2002)-with up to the seventh biennial follow-up data from 2015 to 2016. Obesity status was categorised as normal (body mass index (BMI) <23.5 kg/m2), overweight (23.5-24.9 kg/m2), obese 1 (25.0-27.4 kg/m2) and obese 2 (≥27.5 kg/m2). Hazard ratios (HRs) comparing baseline or time-varying obesity status were estimated using Cox models, whereas risk ratio (RR) was estimated using g-formula.

Results: The Cox model for baseline obesity status demonstrated an increased risk of diabetes in overweight (HR 1.85; 95% CI=1.48-2.31), obese 1 (2.40; 1.97-2.93) and obese 2 (3.65; 2.98-4.47) statuses than that in normal weight status. Obesity as a time-varying exposure with time-varying covariates had HRs of 1.31 (1.07-1.60), 1.55 (1.29-1.86) and 2.58 (2.14-3.12) for overweight, obese 1 and obese 2 statuses. Parametric g-formula comparing if everyone had been in each obesity category versus normal over 15 years showed increased associations of RRs of 1.37 (1.34-1.40), 1.78 (1.76-1.80) and 2.42 (2.34-2.50).

Conclusions: Higher BMI classification category was associated with increased risk of diabetes after accounting for time-varying covariates using g-formula. The results from g-formula were smaller than when considering baseline obesity status only but comparable with the results from time-varying Cox model.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在肥胖与糖尿病的关系中考虑时变暴露和协变量:使用参数 g 公式进行分析。
背景:以往研究肥胖与糖尿病之间的关系时,往往没有考虑受先前肥胖状况影响的时变协变量的作用。本研究使用参数 g 公式量化了肥胖与糖尿病之间的关联:我们纳入了韩国基因组与流行病学研究--安山和安星研究(2001-2002年)中的8924名未患糖尿病的参与者,这些参与者在2015年至2016年期间获得了第七次两年期随访数据。肥胖状态分为正常(体重指数(BMI)2)、超重(23.5-24.9 kg/m2)、肥胖1(25.0-27.4 kg/m2)和肥胖2(≥27.5 kg/m2)。比较基线肥胖状态或随时间变化的肥胖状态的危险比(HRs)采用 Cox 模型估算,而风险比(RR)则采用 g 公式估算:基线肥胖状态的 Cox 模型显示,超重(HR 1.85;95% CI=1.48-2.31)、肥胖 1(2.40;1.97-2.93)和肥胖 2(3.65;2.98-4.47)状态的糖尿病风险高于正常体重状态的糖尿病风险。肥胖是一个时变暴露因子,具有时变协变量,超重、肥胖 1 和肥胖 2 状态的 HR 分别为 1.31 (1.07-1.60)、1.55 (1.29-1.86) 和 2.58 (2.14-3.12)。如果每个人在15年内都处于每个肥胖类别与正常的参数g公式比较,结果显示RRs分别为1.37(1.34-1.40)、1.78(1.76-1.80)和2.42(2.34-2.50):结论:使用 g 公式计算时变协变量后,BMI 分类类别越高,糖尿病风险越高。g-公式得出的结果小于仅考虑基线肥胖状态得出的结果,但与时变 Cox 模型得出的结果相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health is a leading international journal devoted to publication of original research and reviews covering applied, methodological and theoretical issues with emphasis on studies using multidisciplinary or integrative approaches. The journal aims to improve epidemiological knowledge and ultimately health worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Genetic contributions to the educational inequalities in coronary heart disease incidence: a population-based study of 32 000 middle-aged men and women. Differential use of antidiabetic medication related to income, cohabitation and area of residence: a Swedish nationwide cohort study. Re-envisaging child protection contacts as an early prevention opportunity to support child development and well-being: an Australian data linkage study. Examining causal relationships between educational attainment and type 2 diabetes using genetic analysis: findings from the EPIC-InterAct study through Mendelian randomisation. Association of social isolation and loneliness with all-cause and cause-specific mortality among individuals with type 2 diabetes: a prospective study in UK Biobank.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1