EVALPAX: Evaluation of a pharmacist-driven protocol for nirmatrelvir/ritonavir prescribing in a community hospital system.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI:10.1093/ajhp/zxae211
John P Bomkamp, Caleb Isom, Makayla L Wells
{"title":"EVALPAX: Evaluation of a pharmacist-driven protocol for nirmatrelvir/ritonavir prescribing in a community hospital system.","authors":"John P Bomkamp, Caleb Isom, Makayla L Wells","doi":"10.1093/ajhp/zxae211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate pharmacist prescribing of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir to ensure this method of increasing access to treatment is safe and effective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, retrospective observational study included patients receiving a prescription for nirmatrelvir/ritonavir by a physician, nurse practitioner (NP), physician assistant (PA), or pharmacist at an Indiana University (IU) Health West Central Region site over a 3-month period. Patients were divided into two groups: those who received nirmatrelvir/ritonavir prescribed by a pharmacist (the pharmacist prescribed group) and those who received nirmatrelvir/ritonavir prescribed by other providers (the physician/NP/PA prescribed group). Electronic health record (EHR) reviews were performed to assess the appropriateness of prescriptions based on the presence of risk factors and symptoms, day of symptom onset, and dosing. The primary endpoint was the overall appropriateness of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir prescriptions in the two study groups based on emergency use authorization inclusion and exclusion requirements. Secondary endpoints included appropriateness of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir dosing and medically attended visits or mortality within 30 days. Statistical analysis of the endpoints occurred post hoc utilizing the Fisher's exact test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 259 patients were included in the pharmacist prescribed group and 265 patients in the physician/NP/PA prescribed group. Overall appropriate nirmatrelvir/ritonavir prescribing occurred in 258 patients (99.6%) and 232 patients (87.5%) in the pharmacist and physician/NP/PA prescribed groups, respectively (P < 0.0001). Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir dosing was appropriate in 256 patients (98.8%) and 240 patients (90.6%) in the pharmacist and physician/NP/PA prescribed groups, respectively (P < 0.0001). The 30-day rates of medically attended visits were similar between groups. No patients died within 30 days of treatment in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pharmacist prescribing of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir may result in a higher likelihood of prescriptions meeting overall appropriateness criteria. Pharmacists represent an important healthcare professional resource to improve nirmatrelvir/ritonavir prescribing and utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":7577,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":"65-72"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxae211","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate pharmacist prescribing of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir to ensure this method of increasing access to treatment is safe and effective.

Methods: This multicenter, retrospective observational study included patients receiving a prescription for nirmatrelvir/ritonavir by a physician, nurse practitioner (NP), physician assistant (PA), or pharmacist at an Indiana University (IU) Health West Central Region site over a 3-month period. Patients were divided into two groups: those who received nirmatrelvir/ritonavir prescribed by a pharmacist (the pharmacist prescribed group) and those who received nirmatrelvir/ritonavir prescribed by other providers (the physician/NP/PA prescribed group). Electronic health record (EHR) reviews were performed to assess the appropriateness of prescriptions based on the presence of risk factors and symptoms, day of symptom onset, and dosing. The primary endpoint was the overall appropriateness of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir prescriptions in the two study groups based on emergency use authorization inclusion and exclusion requirements. Secondary endpoints included appropriateness of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir dosing and medically attended visits or mortality within 30 days. Statistical analysis of the endpoints occurred post hoc utilizing the Fisher's exact test.

Results: A total of 259 patients were included in the pharmacist prescribed group and 265 patients in the physician/NP/PA prescribed group. Overall appropriate nirmatrelvir/ritonavir prescribing occurred in 258 patients (99.6%) and 232 patients (87.5%) in the pharmacist and physician/NP/PA prescribed groups, respectively (P < 0.0001). Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir dosing was appropriate in 256 patients (98.8%) and 240 patients (90.6%) in the pharmacist and physician/NP/PA prescribed groups, respectively (P < 0.0001). The 30-day rates of medically attended visits were similar between groups. No patients died within 30 days of treatment in either group.

Conclusion: Pharmacist prescribing of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir may result in a higher likelihood of prescriptions meeting overall appropriateness criteria. Pharmacists represent an important healthcare professional resource to improve nirmatrelvir/ritonavir prescribing and utilization.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EVALPAX:在社区医院系统中对药剂师驱动的尼马瑞韦/利托那韦处方协议进行评估。
免责声明:为了加快文章的出版速度,AJHP在接受稿件后会尽快在网上发布。被录用的稿件已经过同行评审和校对,但在进行技术格式化和作者校对之前会在网上发布。目的:本研究旨在评估药剂师开具奈瑞韦酯/利托那韦处方的情况,以确保这种增加治疗机会的方法安全有效:这项多中心回顾性观察研究包括在印第安纳大学(IU)中西部健康中心接受医生、执业护士(NP)、医生助理(PA)或药剂师开具的尼尔马特韦/利托那韦处方的患者,为期 3 个月。患者被分为两组:接受药剂师处方的尼马瑞韦/利托那韦的患者(药剂师处方组)和接受其他医疗服务提供者处方的尼马瑞韦/利托那韦的患者(医生/NP/PA处方组)。对电子健康记录(EHR)进行审查,根据是否存在风险因素和症状、症状发作日和剂量来评估处方的适当性。主要终点是根据紧急用药授权的纳入和排除要求,评估两个研究组中尼马瑞韦/利托那韦处方的总体适当性。次要终点包括奈瑞瑞韦/利托那韦剂量的适当性、30 天内的就诊率或死亡率。采用费雪精确检验对终点进行事后统计分析:药剂师处方组共有 259 名患者,医生/NP/PA 处方组共有 265 名患者。在药剂师处方组和医生/NP/PA处方组中,分别有258名患者(99.6%)和232名患者(87.5%)使用了适当的尼马瑞韦/利托那韦处方(P < 0.0001)。在药剂师处方组和医生/NP/PA 处方组中,分别有 256 名患者(98.8%)和 240 名患者(90.6%)使用了尼马瑞韦/利托那韦剂量(P < 0.0001)。两组患者 30 天内的就诊率相似。两组均无患者在治疗后 30 天内死亡:结论:药剂师开具尼马瑞韦/利托那韦处方可能会提高处方符合总体适当性标准的可能性。药剂师是改善尼马瑞韦/利托那韦处方和使用情况的重要医疗保健专业资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
18.50%
发文量
341
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy (AJHP) is the official publication of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP). It publishes peer-reviewed scientific papers on contemporary drug therapy and pharmacy practice innovations in hospitals and health systems. With a circulation of more than 43,000, AJHP is the most widely recognized and respected clinical pharmacy journal in the world.
期刊最新文献
Challenges with current diagnosis and treatment strategies for precipitated opioid withdrawal in the emergency department and the role of the pharmacist. EVALPAX: Evaluation of a pharmacist-driven protocol for nirmatrelvir/ritonavir prescribing in a community hospital system. Cross-sectional description of hospital pharmacy services in Puerto Rico in 2022 using the Practice Advancement Initiative 2030 Self-Assessment Tool. A qualitative analysis of opportunities to strengthen pharmacy technician career pathways across practice settings. Improving medication safety in a Latin American hospital: Examination of medication errors and the role of pharmacists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1