Comparing the effectiveness of behavioral activation in group vs. self-help format for reducing depression, repetitive thoughts, and enhancing performance of patients with major depressive disorder: a randomized clinical trial.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY BMC Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI:10.1186/s12888-024-05973-z
Soleiman Saberi, Reza Ahmadi, Sahel Khakpoor, Reza Pirzeh, Mohsen Hasani, Latif Moradveisi, Omid Saed
{"title":"Comparing the effectiveness of behavioral activation in group vs. self-help format for reducing depression, repetitive thoughts, and enhancing performance of patients with major depressive disorder: a randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Soleiman Saberi, Reza Ahmadi, Sahel Khakpoor, Reza Pirzeh, Mohsen Hasani, Latif Moradveisi, Omid Saed","doi":"10.1186/s12888-024-05973-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Behavioral activation has gained increasing attention as an effective treatment for depression. However, the effectiveness of Behavioral Activation Group Therapy (BAGT) in controlled conditions compared to its self-help programs requires more investigation. The present study aimed to compare their effectiveness on depressive symptoms, repetitive negative thinking (RNT), and performance in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized clinical trial, 40 patients diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) were recruited based on a structured clinical interview for DSM-5 (SCID-5). Participants were allocated to BAGT (n = 20) and self-help behavioral activation (SBA; n = 20) groups. BAGT received ten weekly sessions (90 min), while the SBA group followed the same protocol as the self-help intervention. Participants were evaluated at pre-treatment, post-treatment, and the 2-month follow-up using the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), repetitive thinking questionnaire (RTQ-31), and work and social adjustment scale (WSAS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of a Mixed ANOVA analysis revealed that participants who underwent BAGT showed significant improvement in depression, rumination, work, and social functioning post-treatment and at the 2-month follow-up. However, the SBA group did not show significant changes in any outcome. The study also found that, based on clinical significance, 68% of the BAGT participants were responsive to treatment, and 31% achieved a high final performance status at the 2-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>BAGT was more effective than SBA in MDD patients. Participants' engagement with self-help treatment is discussed.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The present trial has been registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials Center (IRCT ID: IRCT20181128041782N1|| http://www.irct.ir/ ) (Registration Date: 04/03/2019).</p>","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11264713/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-05973-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Behavioral activation has gained increasing attention as an effective treatment for depression. However, the effectiveness of Behavioral Activation Group Therapy (BAGT) in controlled conditions compared to its self-help programs requires more investigation. The present study aimed to compare their effectiveness on depressive symptoms, repetitive negative thinking (RNT), and performance in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD).

Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, 40 patients diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) were recruited based on a structured clinical interview for DSM-5 (SCID-5). Participants were allocated to BAGT (n = 20) and self-help behavioral activation (SBA; n = 20) groups. BAGT received ten weekly sessions (90 min), while the SBA group followed the same protocol as the self-help intervention. Participants were evaluated at pre-treatment, post-treatment, and the 2-month follow-up using the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), repetitive thinking questionnaire (RTQ-31), and work and social adjustment scale (WSAS).

Results: The results of a Mixed ANOVA analysis revealed that participants who underwent BAGT showed significant improvement in depression, rumination, work, and social functioning post-treatment and at the 2-month follow-up. However, the SBA group did not show significant changes in any outcome. The study also found that, based on clinical significance, 68% of the BAGT participants were responsive to treatment, and 31% achieved a high final performance status at the 2-month follow-up.

Discussion: BAGT was more effective than SBA in MDD patients. Participants' engagement with self-help treatment is discussed.

Trial registration: The present trial has been registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials Center (IRCT ID: IRCT20181128041782N1|| http://www.irct.ir/ ) (Registration Date: 04/03/2019).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较小组与自助形式的行为激活对减少重度抑郁障碍患者的抑郁、重复想法和提高工作表现的效果:随机临床试验。
背景:行为激活疗法作为一种有效的抑郁症治疗方法,受到越来越多的关注。然而,行为激活团体疗法(BAGT)在受控条件下与其自助项目相比的有效性还需要更多的研究。本研究旨在比较它们对重度抑郁障碍(MDD)患者的抑郁症状、重复性消极思维(RNT)和表现的有效性:在这项随机临床试验中,根据 DSM-5 结构化临床访谈(SCID-5)招募了 40 名被诊断为重度抑郁障碍(MDD)的患者。参与者被分配到 BAGT 组(20 人)和自助行为激活组(20 人)。BAGT 组每周进行十次治疗(90 分钟),而 SBA 组则采用与自助干预相同的方案。在治疗前、治疗后和两个月的随访中,使用贝克抑郁量表 II(BDI-II)、重复思维问卷(RTQ-31)和工作与社会适应量表(WSAS)对参与者进行了评估:混合方差分析结果显示,接受 BAGT 治疗的参与者在治疗后和两个月的随访中,在抑郁、反刍、工作和社会功能方面均有显著改善。然而,SBA 组在任何结果上都没有明显变化。研究还发现,根据临床意义,68%的BAGT参与者对治疗有反应,31%的参与者在2个月的随访中达到了较高的最终表现状态:讨论:对 MDD 患者而言,BAGT 比 SBA 更有效。讨论:BAGT对MDD患者的疗效优于SBA,并对参与者参与自助治疗的情况进行了讨论:本试验已在伊朗临床试验注册中心注册(IRCT ID:IRCT20181128041782N1|| http://www.irct.ir/ )(注册日期:2019年3月4日)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Discharge from secondary care services to primary care for adults with serious mental illness: a scoping review Accepting and committing to caregiving for schizophrenia—a mixed method pilot study Influencing factors of posttraumatic stress disorder in Shidu parents who have lost their only child: a cross-sectional survey Barriers to professional psychological help among pregnant women in China: a qualitative study The association between expressive suppression and anxiety in Chinese left-behind children in middle school: serial mediation roles of psychological resilience and self-esteem
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1