Indications for cerebral revascularization for moyamoya syndrome in pediatric sickle cell disease determined by Delphi methodology.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-07-19 Print Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.3171/2024.5.PEDS2426
Adam P Robert, Ricardo A Hanel, P David Adelson, Shih-Shan Lang, Paul Grabb, Stephanie Greene, James M Johnston, Jeffrey Leonard, Suresh N Magge, Neena I Marupudi, Joseph Piatt, Rafael De Oliveira Sillero, Edward R Smith, Jodi Smith, Jennifer M Strahle, Sudhakar Vadivelu, John C Wellons, David Wrubel, Asmaa Hatem, Ciarra Moody, Sabrina H Han, Alaa Montaser, Nicklaus Millican, John M Pederson, Aleksandra S Dain, Lauren A Beslow, Philipp R Aldana
{"title":"Indications for cerebral revascularization for moyamoya syndrome in pediatric sickle cell disease determined by Delphi methodology.","authors":"Adam P Robert, Ricardo A Hanel, P David Adelson, Shih-Shan Lang, Paul Grabb, Stephanie Greene, James M Johnston, Jeffrey Leonard, Suresh N Magge, Neena I Marupudi, Joseph Piatt, Rafael De Oliveira Sillero, Edward R Smith, Jodi Smith, Jennifer M Strahle, Sudhakar Vadivelu, John C Wellons, David Wrubel, Asmaa Hatem, Ciarra Moody, Sabrina H Han, Alaa Montaser, Nicklaus Millican, John M Pederson, Aleksandra S Dain, Lauren A Beslow, Philipp R Aldana","doi":"10.3171/2024.5.PEDS2426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cerebral revascularization surgery (CRS) has been used to prevent stroke in children with sickle cell disease (SCD) and cerebral vasculopathy (e.g., moyamoya syndrome). While results suggest that it may be an effective treatment, surgical indications have not been well defined. This study sought to determine indications for offering revascularization surgery in centers with established sickle cell programs in the US.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three sequential surveys utilizing the Delphi methodology were administered to neurosurgeons participating in the Stroke in Sickle Cell Revascularization Surgery study. Respondents were presented with clinical scenarios of patients with SCD and varying degrees of ischemic presentation and vasculopathy, and the group's agreement to offer surgical revascularization was measured. Consensus was defined as ≥ 75% similar responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate to all 3 surveys was 100%. Seventeen neurosurgeons from 16 different centers participated. The presence of moyamoya collaterals (MMCs) and arterial stenosis matching an ischemic distribution yielded the strongest recommendations to offer surgery. There was consensus to offer revascularization in the presence of MMCs and at least 50% arterial stenosis matching an ischemic distribution. In contrast, there was no consensus to offer revascularization with 50%-70% stenosis not matching an ischemic presentation in the absence of MMCs. The presence of the ivy sign in the distribution of the stenotic artery also contributed to the consensus to offer surgery in certain scenarios.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There were several clinical scenarios that attained consensus to offer surgery; the strongest was moderate to severe arterial stenosis that matched the distribution of ischemic presentation in the presence of MMCs. Radiological findings of decreased cerebral flow or perfusion also facilitated attaining consensus to offer surgery. The findings of this study reflect expert opinion about questions that deserve prospective clinical research. Determination of indications for CRS can guide clinical practice and aid the design of prospective studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16549,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.5.PEDS2426","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Cerebral revascularization surgery (CRS) has been used to prevent stroke in children with sickle cell disease (SCD) and cerebral vasculopathy (e.g., moyamoya syndrome). While results suggest that it may be an effective treatment, surgical indications have not been well defined. This study sought to determine indications for offering revascularization surgery in centers with established sickle cell programs in the US.

Methods: Three sequential surveys utilizing the Delphi methodology were administered to neurosurgeons participating in the Stroke in Sickle Cell Revascularization Surgery study. Respondents were presented with clinical scenarios of patients with SCD and varying degrees of ischemic presentation and vasculopathy, and the group's agreement to offer surgical revascularization was measured. Consensus was defined as ≥ 75% similar responses.

Results: The response rate to all 3 surveys was 100%. Seventeen neurosurgeons from 16 different centers participated. The presence of moyamoya collaterals (MMCs) and arterial stenosis matching an ischemic distribution yielded the strongest recommendations to offer surgery. There was consensus to offer revascularization in the presence of MMCs and at least 50% arterial stenosis matching an ischemic distribution. In contrast, there was no consensus to offer revascularization with 50%-70% stenosis not matching an ischemic presentation in the absence of MMCs. The presence of the ivy sign in the distribution of the stenotic artery also contributed to the consensus to offer surgery in certain scenarios.

Conclusions: There were several clinical scenarios that attained consensus to offer surgery; the strongest was moderate to severe arterial stenosis that matched the distribution of ischemic presentation in the presence of MMCs. Radiological findings of decreased cerebral flow or perfusion also facilitated attaining consensus to offer surgery. The findings of this study reflect expert opinion about questions that deserve prospective clinical research. Determination of indications for CRS can guide clinical practice and aid the design of prospective studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过德尔菲法确定小儿镰状细胞病患者进行脑血管再通手术治疗莫亚莫亚综合征的适应症。
目的:脑血管重建手术(CRS)已被用于预防镰状细胞病(SCD)和脑血管病(如莫亚莫亚综合征)患儿的中风。虽然结果表明这是一种有效的治疗方法,但手术适应症尚未明确。本研究旨在确定美国已建立镰状细胞项目的中心提供血管重建手术的适应症:方法:利用德尔菲法对参与镰状细胞再血管化手术中风研究的神经外科医生进行了三次连续调查。向受访者展示了SCD患者不同程度的缺血表现和血管病变的临床情景,并对小组是否同意提供血管重建手术进行了测量。结果:所有 3 项调查的回复率均为 100%。来自 16 个不同中心的 17 名神经外科医生参与了调查。莫亚莫亚侧支(MMC)的存在和动脉狭窄与缺血分布相匹配,最强烈建议进行手术治疗。在出现 MMCs 和至少 50% 的动脉狭窄与缺血分布相匹配的情况下,提供血管再通术已达成共识。与此相反,在没有 MMCs 的情况下,如果动脉狭窄 50%-70%,且不符合缺血表现,则不建议进行血管再通手术。在某些情况下,狭窄动脉分布区出现常春藤征也有助于达成提供手术治疗的共识:结论:有几种临床情况达成了手术共识,其中最严重的是中度至重度动脉狭窄,其缺血表现与出现 MMCs 时的分布相吻合。脑血流或灌注减少的放射学发现也有助于达成手术共识。这项研究的结果反映了专家对一些问题的看法,这些问题值得进行前瞻性临床研究。确定 CRS 的适应症可以指导临床实践,有助于前瞻性研究的设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics
Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
307
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Information not localiced
期刊最新文献
Pediatric CSF diversion procedures for treatment of hydrocephalus during the COVID-19 pandemic. The impact of spheno-occipital synchondrosis exposure via extended endoscopic endonasal surgery on midface growth in pediatric patients. Association between social determinants of health and select neurosurgical procedures in the National Spina Bifida Patient Registry. Letter to the Editor. Sleep apnea and Chiari malformation type I. Predictors of postsurgical retethering in pediatric fatty or tight filum terminale: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 1167 patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1