Improving disease-specific survival for patients with Sezary syndrome in the modern era of systemic therapies

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY British Journal of Haematology Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI:10.1111/bjh.19647
Belinda A. Campbell, Gabor Dobos, Zahra Haider, Martine Bagot, Felicity Evison, Carrie van der Weyden, Chris McCormack, Caroline Ram-Wolff, Maryam Miladi, H. Miles Prince, Julia J. Scarisbrick
{"title":"Improving disease-specific survival for patients with Sezary syndrome in the modern era of systemic therapies","authors":"Belinda A. Campbell,&nbsp;Gabor Dobos,&nbsp;Zahra Haider,&nbsp;Martine Bagot,&nbsp;Felicity Evison,&nbsp;Carrie van der Weyden,&nbsp;Chris McCormack,&nbsp;Caroline Ram-Wolff,&nbsp;Maryam Miladi,&nbsp;H. Miles Prince,&nbsp;Julia J. Scarisbrick","doi":"10.1111/bjh.19647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Traditionally, Sezary syndrome (SS) has been associated with few therapeutic options and poor prognosis, with 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) less than one-third in historical cohorts. However, newer therapies and combinations are associated with impressive time-to-next-treatment (TTNT), particularly allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (AlloSCT) and combination therapies notably those including extracorporeal photopheresis. In this multicentre, international study, we explored the prognostic outcomes of 178 patients exclusively managed for SS, diagnosed between 2012 and 2020, and treated in the modern therapeutic era. In this cohort, 58 different therapies were delivered, with 13.5% of patients receiving AlloSCT. Long-term survival exceeded historical reports with 5-year DSS and OS of 56.4% and 53.4% respectively. In those receiving AlloSCT, prognosis was excellent: 5-year DSS and OS were 90.5% and 78.0% respectively. Confirming the results from the Cutaneous Lymphoma International Consortium (CLIC), LDH and LCT had significant prognostic impact. Unlike earlier studies, stage did not have prognostic impact; we speculate that greater relative benefit favours patients with extensive lymphomatous nodal disease (Stage IVA2) compared to historical reports. For patients ineligible for AlloSCT, the prognosis remains relatively poor (5-year DSS 51.4% and OS 49.6%), representing ongoing unmet needs for more effective novel agents and investigation of improved therapeutic combinations.</p>","PeriodicalId":135,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Haematology","volume":"205 5","pages":"1825-1829"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjh.19647","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Haematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjh.19647","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditionally, Sezary syndrome (SS) has been associated with few therapeutic options and poor prognosis, with 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) less than one-third in historical cohorts. However, newer therapies and combinations are associated with impressive time-to-next-treatment (TTNT), particularly allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (AlloSCT) and combination therapies notably those including extracorporeal photopheresis. In this multicentre, international study, we explored the prognostic outcomes of 178 patients exclusively managed for SS, diagnosed between 2012 and 2020, and treated in the modern therapeutic era. In this cohort, 58 different therapies were delivered, with 13.5% of patients receiving AlloSCT. Long-term survival exceeded historical reports with 5-year DSS and OS of 56.4% and 53.4% respectively. In those receiving AlloSCT, prognosis was excellent: 5-year DSS and OS were 90.5% and 78.0% respectively. Confirming the results from the Cutaneous Lymphoma International Consortium (CLIC), LDH and LCT had significant prognostic impact. Unlike earlier studies, stage did not have prognostic impact; we speculate that greater relative benefit favours patients with extensive lymphomatous nodal disease (Stage IVA2) compared to historical reports. For patients ineligible for AlloSCT, the prognosis remains relatively poor (5-year DSS 51.4% and OS 49.6%), representing ongoing unmet needs for more effective novel agents and investigation of improved therapeutic combinations.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在现代系统疗法时代,提高塞扎里综合征患者的疾病特异性生存率。
传统上,塞扎里综合征(Sezary Syndrome,SS)的治疗方案少,预后差,在历史队列中,5年疾病特异性生存率(DSS)不到三分之一。然而,较新的疗法和联合疗法,特别是异基因干细胞移植(AlloSCT)和联合疗法,尤其是包括体外光动力疗法在内的疗法,其下一次治疗时间(TTNT)令人印象深刻。在这项多中心国际研究中,我们探讨了2012年至2020年期间确诊并在现代治疗时代接受治疗的178名SS患者的预后结果。在这个队列中,共采用了58种不同的疗法,其中13.5%的患者接受了异体干细胞移植。长期生存率超过了历史报告,5年DSS和OS分别为56.4%和53.4%。接受异体干细胞移植的患者预后极佳:5年DSS和OS分别为90.5%和78.0%。与皮肤淋巴瘤国际联盟(CLIC)的研究结果一致,LDH和LCT对预后有重要影响。与早期研究不同的是,分期对预后没有影响;我们推测,与历史报告相比,广泛淋巴结病(IVA2期)患者的相对获益更大。对于不符合 AlloSCT 治疗条件的患者,预后仍然相对较差(5 年 DSS 为 51.4%,OS 为 49.6%),这表明对更有效的新型药物和改良治疗组合的研究仍有需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
4.60%
发文量
565
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Haematology publishes original research papers in clinical, laboratory and experimental haematology. The Journal also features annotations, reviews, short reports, images in haematology and Letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Depression, sleep and pain affect instrumental activities of daily living through cognitive functioning in adults with sickle cell disease: A report from the Sickle Cell Disease Implementation Consortium. Are we there yet? CAR-T therapy in multiple myeloma. Rates of discordant CD20 status by flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry in B-ALL. EBV-positive inflammatory follicular dendritic cell sarcoma, an entity by many names. Impaired physical ability in patients with transfusion-dependent β-thalassaemia: Can regular physical activity be a countermeasure?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1