Prognosticating global functional outcome in the recurrent ischemic stroke using baseline clinical and pre-clinical features: A machine learning study.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of evaluation in clinical practice Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI:10.1111/jep.14100
Tran Nhat Phong Dao, Hien Nguyen Thanh Dang, My Thi Kim Pham, Hien Thi Nguyen, Cuong Tran Chi, Minh Van Le
{"title":"Prognosticating global functional outcome in the recurrent ischemic stroke using baseline clinical and pre-clinical features: A machine learning study.","authors":"Tran Nhat Phong Dao, Hien Nguyen Thanh Dang, My Thi Kim Pham, Hien Thi Nguyen, Cuong Tran Chi, Minh Van Le","doi":"10.1111/jep.14100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Recurrent ischemic stroke (RIS) induces additional functional limitations in patients. Prognosticating globally functional outcome (GFO) in RIS patients is thereby important to plan a suitable rehabilitation programme. This study sought to investigate the ability of baseline features for classifying the patients with and without improving GFO (task 1) and identifying patients with poor GFO (task 2) at the third month after discharging from RIS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 86 RIS patients were recruited and divided into the training set and testing set (50:50). The clinical and pre-clinical data were recorded. The outcome was the changes in Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) (task 1) and the mRS score at the third month (mRS 0-2: good GFO, mRS >2: poor GFO) (task 2). The permutation importance ranking method selected features. Four algorithms were trained on the training set with five-fold cross-validation. The best model was tested on the testing set.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In task 1, the support vector machine (SVM) model outperformed the other models, with the high performance matrix on the training set (sensitivity = 0.80; specificity = 1.00) and the testing set (sensitivity = 0.80; specificity = 0.95). In task 2, the SVM model with selected features also performed well on both datasets (training set: sensitivity = 0.76; specificity = 0.92; testing set: sensitivity = 0.72; specificity = 0.88).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A machine learning model could be used to classify GFO responses to treatment and identify the third-month poor GFO in RIS patients, supporting physicians in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.14100","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Recurrent ischemic stroke (RIS) induces additional functional limitations in patients. Prognosticating globally functional outcome (GFO) in RIS patients is thereby important to plan a suitable rehabilitation programme. This study sought to investigate the ability of baseline features for classifying the patients with and without improving GFO (task 1) and identifying patients with poor GFO (task 2) at the third month after discharging from RIS.

Methods: A total of 86 RIS patients were recruited and divided into the training set and testing set (50:50). The clinical and pre-clinical data were recorded. The outcome was the changes in Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) (task 1) and the mRS score at the third month (mRS 0-2: good GFO, mRS >2: poor GFO) (task 2). The permutation importance ranking method selected features. Four algorithms were trained on the training set with five-fold cross-validation. The best model was tested on the testing set.

Results: In task 1, the support vector machine (SVM) model outperformed the other models, with the high performance matrix on the training set (sensitivity = 0.80; specificity = 1.00) and the testing set (sensitivity = 0.80; specificity = 0.95). In task 2, the SVM model with selected features also performed well on both datasets (training set: sensitivity = 0.76; specificity = 0.92; testing set: sensitivity = 0.72; specificity = 0.88).

Conclusion: A machine learning model could be used to classify GFO responses to treatment and identify the third-month poor GFO in RIS patients, supporting physicians in clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用基线临床和临床前特征预测复发性缺血性中风的整体功能预后:机器学习研究
背景和目的:复发性缺血性脑卒中(RIS)会导致患者出现额外的功能限制。因此,对复发性缺血性脑卒中(RIS)患者的整体功能预后(GFO)进行预测对于规划合适的康复计划非常重要。本研究旨在调查基线特征在 RIS 出院后第三个月对 GFO 有改善和无改善的患者进行分类(任务 1)以及识别 GFO 不良患者(任务 2)的能力:共招募了86名RIS患者,并将其分为训练集和测试集(50:50)。记录临床和临床前数据。结果为改良朗肯量表(mRS)的变化(任务 1)和第三个月的 mRS 评分(mRS 0-2:良好 GFO,mRS >2:不良 GFO)(任务 2)。置换重要性排序法选择特征。四种算法在训练集上进行了五倍交叉验证训练。最佳模型在测试集上进行测试:在任务 1 中,支持向量机(SVM)模型的表现优于其他模型,其高性能矩阵在训练集(灵敏度 = 0.80;特异性 = 1.00)和测试集(灵敏度 = 0.80;特异性 = 0.95)上均表现优异。在任务 2 中,带有选定特征的 SVM 模型在两个数据集上的表现也很好(训练集:灵敏度 = 0.76;特异性 = 0.92;测试集:灵敏度 = 0.72;特异性 = 0.88):机器学习模型可用于对GFO治疗反应进行分类,并识别RIS患者第三个月的GFO不良反应,为医生的临床实践提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
期刊最新文献
Adaptation of the health literacy survey19-Europe-Q12 into Turkish culture: A psychometric study. The effect of preadmission education given to bariatric surgery patients on postoperative recovery: A randomized controlled study. What is the probability that higher versus lower quality of evidence represents true effects estimates? Effect of evidence-based nursing practices on individualised care: A cross-sectional descriptive study. Mastering meta-analysis in Microsoft Excel with MetaXL add-in: A comprehensive tutorial and guide to meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1