Parent-reported genetic counselor adherence to the NSGC practice resource for communicating a potential prenatal diagnosis: Impact on the Down syndrome diagnosis experience.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY Journal of Genetic Counseling Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI:10.1002/jgc4.1948
Maryam R Ijaz, Angela M Trepanier, Harold L Kleinert, Sierra M Weiss, Stephanie H Meredith
{"title":"Parent-reported genetic counselor adherence to the NSGC practice resource for communicating a potential prenatal diagnosis: Impact on the Down syndrome diagnosis experience.","authors":"Maryam R Ijaz, Angela M Trepanier, Harold L Kleinert, Sierra M Weiss, Stephanie H Meredith","doi":"10.1002/jgc4.1948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2011, the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC) published practice resources about communicating a prenatal or postnatal diagnosis of Down syndrome (DS). However, the impact of GC adherence to those recommendations on patient experiences has been unknown. The objective of this analysis was to investigate perceived GC adherence to professional recommendations for delivering a DS diagnosis and the impact on parental diagnosis experiences and the information and support offered. Parents of children with DS born between 2016 and 2021 completed a survey distributed by 12 local DS organizations and the national DS Diagnosis Network to assess prenatal diagnosis experiences and the provision of support and information by health professionals. Participants were queried about whether their GC followed specific recommendations from the NSGC practice resource. Respondents were also invited to describe their diagnosis experience. An overall perceived adherence score was calculated (percentage of elements GC demonstrated/total number of elements). Open-ended responses were inductively coded by a GC and GC student to identify categories and to perform a sentiment analysis where 1 was completely negative, 2 was mixed/more negative, 3 was neutral, 4 was mixed/more positive, and 5 was completely positive. The GCs were blinded to participants' perceived adherence scores while performing the sentiment analysis. Of the 242 parents who completed the survey, 161 respondents answered questions about GC's perceived practice resource adherence. The median perceived adherence score was 42.9% (IQR 21.4-71.4)%. A total of 61 people provided an open-ended response about their prenatal diagnosis experience with a GC and were assigned a sentiment score. The median sentiment score was 3 (IQR 1-5). Kendall's Tau analysis showed that higher perceived practice resource adherence was associated with more positive sentiment scores. These results suggest that NSGC practice resource adherence may improve the prenatal diagnosis experiences of parents of children with DS and have the potential to improve counseling outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":54829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1948","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2011, the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC) published practice resources about communicating a prenatal or postnatal diagnosis of Down syndrome (DS). However, the impact of GC adherence to those recommendations on patient experiences has been unknown. The objective of this analysis was to investigate perceived GC adherence to professional recommendations for delivering a DS diagnosis and the impact on parental diagnosis experiences and the information and support offered. Parents of children with DS born between 2016 and 2021 completed a survey distributed by 12 local DS organizations and the national DS Diagnosis Network to assess prenatal diagnosis experiences and the provision of support and information by health professionals. Participants were queried about whether their GC followed specific recommendations from the NSGC practice resource. Respondents were also invited to describe their diagnosis experience. An overall perceived adherence score was calculated (percentage of elements GC demonstrated/total number of elements). Open-ended responses were inductively coded by a GC and GC student to identify categories and to perform a sentiment analysis where 1 was completely negative, 2 was mixed/more negative, 3 was neutral, 4 was mixed/more positive, and 5 was completely positive. The GCs were blinded to participants' perceived adherence scores while performing the sentiment analysis. Of the 242 parents who completed the survey, 161 respondents answered questions about GC's perceived practice resource adherence. The median perceived adherence score was 42.9% (IQR 21.4-71.4)%. A total of 61 people provided an open-ended response about their prenatal diagnosis experience with a GC and were assigned a sentiment score. The median sentiment score was 3 (IQR 1-5). Kendall's Tau analysis showed that higher perceived practice resource adherence was associated with more positive sentiment scores. These results suggest that NSGC practice resource adherence may improve the prenatal diagnosis experiences of parents of children with DS and have the potential to improve counseling outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家长报告遗传咨询师遵守国家遗传学会产前诊断潜在沟通实践资源的情况:对唐氏综合征诊断经验的影响。
2011 年,全美遗传咨询师协会 (NSGC) 发布了有关产前或产后唐氏综合征 (DS) 诊断沟通的实践资源。然而,遗传咨询师遵守这些建议对患者体验的影响尚不清楚。本分析的目的是调查医疗机构对提供唐氏综合征诊断的专业建议的遵守情况,以及对父母诊断经历和所提供的信息与支持的影响。2016 年至 2021 年间出生的 DS 患儿的父母完成了一份由 12 个地方 DS 组织和全国 DS 诊断网络分发的调查,以评估产前诊断经验以及医疗专业人员提供的支持和信息。调查询问了受访者他们的产前诊断是否遵循了国家儿童疾病诊断中心实践资源中的具体建议。受访者还被邀请描述他们的诊断经历。我们计算了总体的感知依从性得分(GC 展示的要素百分比/要素总数)。开放式回答由一名 GC 和一名 GC 学生进行归纳编码,以确定类别并进行情感分析,其中 1 表示完全负面,2 表示混合/较为负面,3 表示中性,4 表示混合/较为正面,5 表示完全正面。在进行情感分析时,GC 对参与者的依从感评分是盲测的。在完成调查的 242 位家长中,有 161 位受访者回答了有关 GC 认为实践资源依从性的问题。认知依从性得分的中位数为 42.9%(IQR 21.4-71.4)%。共有 61 人就其与 GC 进行产前诊断的经历提供了开放式回答,并被赋予了情感分值。情感得分的中位数为 3(IQR 1-5)。Kendall's Tau 分析表明,感知到的实践资源依从性越高,情感得分越高。这些结果表明,NSGC实践资源的依从性可能会改善DS患儿父母的产前诊断体验,并有可能改善咨询结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Journal of Genetic Counseling GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
26.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Genetic Counseling (JOGC), published for the National Society of Genetic Counselors, is a timely, international forum addressing all aspects of the discipline and practice of genetic counseling. The journal focuses on the critical questions and problems that arise at the interface between rapidly advancing technological developments and the concerns of individuals and communities at genetic risk. The publication provides genetic counselors, other clinicians and health educators, laboratory geneticists, bioethicists, legal scholars, social scientists, and other researchers with a premier resource on genetic counseling topics in national, international, and cross-national contexts.
期刊最新文献
The current landscape of clinical exome and genome reanalysis in the U.S. A cross-sectional survey-based exploration of diversity in the admissions committees and student cohorts of genetic counseling programs over time. An analysis of direct-to-consumer genetic testing portals and their communication of health risk and test limitations. Patient perceptions of genetic counselors' role and emotional support needs in adults with Parkinson's disease Clinical genetic counselors' use of people‐ and identity‐first language in regard to patients' identification with disability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1