Evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for predicting tumor grade in small (≤4 cm) clear cell renal cell carcinoma: Qualitative and quantitative analysis.

Ming Liang, Haolin Qiu, Bing Ou, Jiayi Wu, Xinbao Zhao, Baoming Luo
{"title":"Evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for predicting tumor grade in small (≤4 cm) clear cell renal cell carcinoma: Qualitative and quantitative analysis.","authors":"Ming Liang, Haolin Qiu, Bing Ou, Jiayi Wu, Xinbao Zhao, Baoming Luo","doi":"10.3233/CH-231990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aimed to evaluate the utility of qualitative and quantitative analysis employing contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in predicting the WHO/ISUP grade of small (≤4 cm) clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCCs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with small ccRCCs, confirmed by histological examination, underwent preoperative CEUS and were classified into low- (grade I/II) and high-grade (grade III/IV) groups. Qualitative and quantitative assessments of CEUS were conducted and compared between the two groups. Diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 72 patients were diagnosed with small ccRCCs, comprising 23 individuals in the high-grade group and 49 in the low-grade group. The low-grade group exhibited a significantly greater percentage of hyper-enhancement compared to the high-grade group (79.6% VS 39.1%, P < 0.05). The low-grade group showed significantly higher relative index values for peak enhancement, wash-in area under the curve, wash-in rate, wash-in perfusion index, and wash-out rate compared to the high-grade group (all P < 0.05). The AUC values for qualitative and quantitative parameters in predicting the WHO/ISUP grade of small ccRCCs ranged from 0.676 to 0.756.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both qualitative and quantitative CEUS analysis could help to distinguish the high- from low-grade small ccRCCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":93943,"journal":{"name":"Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation","volume":" ","pages":"351-362"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/CH-231990","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The study aimed to evaluate the utility of qualitative and quantitative analysis employing contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in predicting the WHO/ISUP grade of small (≤4 cm) clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCCs).

Methods: Patients with small ccRCCs, confirmed by histological examination, underwent preoperative CEUS and were classified into low- (grade I/II) and high-grade (grade III/IV) groups. Qualitative and quantitative assessments of CEUS were conducted and compared between the two groups. Diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves.

Results: A total of 72 patients were diagnosed with small ccRCCs, comprising 23 individuals in the high-grade group and 49 in the low-grade group. The low-grade group exhibited a significantly greater percentage of hyper-enhancement compared to the high-grade group (79.6% VS 39.1%, P < 0.05). The low-grade group showed significantly higher relative index values for peak enhancement, wash-in area under the curve, wash-in rate, wash-in perfusion index, and wash-out rate compared to the high-grade group (all P < 0.05). The AUC values for qualitative and quantitative parameters in predicting the WHO/ISUP grade of small ccRCCs ranged from 0.676 to 0.756.

Conclusions: Both qualitative and quantitative CEUS analysis could help to distinguish the high- from low-grade small ccRCCs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估造影剂增强超声预测小细胞(≤4 厘米)透明细胞肾细胞癌的肿瘤分级:定性与定量分析
研究目的该研究旨在评估造影剂增强超声波(CEUS)的定性和定量分析在预测小型(≤4厘米)透明细胞肾细胞癌(ccRCC)的WHO/ISUP分级方面的实用性:经组织学检查确诊的小型ccRCC患者接受术前CEUS检查,并被分为低级别(I/II级)和高级别(III/IV级)两组。对CEUS进行定性和定量评估,并在两组之间进行比较。使用接收器操作特征曲线评估诊断效果:结果:共有72名患者被确诊为小型ccRCC,其中高级别组23人,低级别组49人。与高级别组相比,低级别组的高增强比例明显更高(79.6% VS 39.1%,P 结论:CEUS定性和定量CEUS均可用于诊断小型ccRCC:CEUS定性和定量分析有助于区分高级别和低级别小型ccRCC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of an oral Beta-caryophyllene Indena Phytosome® for the treatment of pain and inflammation in interstitial cystitis. Diagnostic analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound features in malignant partially cystic thyroid nodules. Microfluidic analysis of epigallocatechin gallate selectively inhibiting shear-induced platelet aggregation under pathological high shear stress. A comparison of microvascular flow imaging and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the assessment of early chronic kidney disease. Accuracy and influencing factors of hepatic venous pressure gradient, spleen stiffness and liver stiffness in the detection of portal hypertension with liver cirrhosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1