Differential Secretomes of Processed Adipose Grafts, the Stromal Vascular Fraction, and Adipose-Derived Stem Cells.

Stem cells and development Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-09 DOI:10.1089/scd.2024.0071
Hannah Carr, Malke Asaad, Yewen Wu, Cynthia Branch-Brooks, Qixu Zhang, Peiman Hematti, Summer E Hanson
{"title":"Differential Secretomes of Processed Adipose Grafts, the Stromal Vascular Fraction, and Adipose-Derived Stem Cells.","authors":"Hannah Carr, Malke Asaad, Yewen Wu, Cynthia Branch-Brooks, Qixu Zhang, Peiman Hematti, Summer E Hanson","doi":"10.1089/scd.2024.0071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are multiple methods to prepare lipoaspirate for autologous fat transfer; however, graft retention remains unpredictable. The purpose of this study was to compare the cellular and protein composition of adipose grafts and the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) resulting from three common techniques to prepare adipose grafts. Adipose grafts were harvested from healthy donors and processed via three techniques: centrifugation (C), a single-filter (SF) device, and a double-filtration (DF) system. Part of each graft was analyzed or further processed to isolate the SVF. Cell viability, surface markers, cytokine, and growth factors were compared between the graft and SVF as well as adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs). Overall, we found variations across the three processing techniques and among the graft components (ASCs, SVF, and fat). Cell viability within the grafts was similar (94.6%, 92.3%, and 93.6%; <i>P</i> = 0.93). The trend was a greater percentage of ASCs from SF versus DF or centrifugation (6.95%, 4.63%, and 1.93%, respectively, <i>P</i> = 0.06). Adipogenic markers (adiponectin and leptin) were similar among all three grafts (<i>P</i> = 0.45). Markers of tissue remodeling were greatest in the SVF compared with fat and ASCs, regardless of processing technique. There was higher relative expression of MMP-9 (2×), Extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer (EMMPRIN) (2.5×), endoglin (5×), and IL-8 (1.5×) in the SVF (<i>P</i> < 0.005). Our study identified differences in cytokine expression in adipose grafts and the SVF, particularly in cytokines important in inflammation and wound healing. These secretomes may impact graft retention and fat necrosis and have the potential implications in cell-assisted lipotransfer. There were no significant differences between the final products of any of the processing techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":94214,"journal":{"name":"Stem cells and development","volume":" ","pages":"477-483"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stem cells and development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2024.0071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are multiple methods to prepare lipoaspirate for autologous fat transfer; however, graft retention remains unpredictable. The purpose of this study was to compare the cellular and protein composition of adipose grafts and the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) resulting from three common techniques to prepare adipose grafts. Adipose grafts were harvested from healthy donors and processed via three techniques: centrifugation (C), a single-filter (SF) device, and a double-filtration (DF) system. Part of each graft was analyzed or further processed to isolate the SVF. Cell viability, surface markers, cytokine, and growth factors were compared between the graft and SVF as well as adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs). Overall, we found variations across the three processing techniques and among the graft components (ASCs, SVF, and fat). Cell viability within the grafts was similar (94.6%, 92.3%, and 93.6%; P = 0.93). The trend was a greater percentage of ASCs from SF versus DF or centrifugation (6.95%, 4.63%, and 1.93%, respectively, P = 0.06). Adipogenic markers (adiponectin and leptin) were similar among all three grafts (P = 0.45). Markers of tissue remodeling were greatest in the SVF compared with fat and ASCs, regardless of processing technique. There was higher relative expression of MMP-9 (2×), Extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer (EMMPRIN) (2.5×), endoglin (5×), and IL-8 (1.5×) in the SVF (P < 0.005). Our study identified differences in cytokine expression in adipose grafts and the SVF, particularly in cytokines important in inflammation and wound healing. These secretomes may impact graft retention and fat necrosis and have the potential implications in cell-assisted lipotransfer. There were no significant differences between the final products of any of the processing techniques.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加工过的脂肪移植物、基质血管馏分和脂肪来源干细胞的不同分泌物。
有多种方法可以制备用于自体脂肪移植的脂肪抽吸物,但移植体的保留仍然难以预测。本研究的目的是比较脂肪移植物和基质血管部分(SVF)的细胞和蛋白质组成,这些组成来自三种常用的脂肪移植物制备技术。脂肪移植物取自健康供体,并通过三种技术进行处理:离心(C)、单层过滤(SF)装置和双层过滤(DF)系统。对每个移植物的一部分进行分析或进一步处理,以分离 SVF。我们比较了移植物和 SVF 以及脂肪衍生干细胞(ASCs)的细胞活力、表面标志物、细胞因子和生长因子。总体而言,我们发现三种处理技术和移植物成分(ASCs、SVF、脂肪)之间存在差异。移植物内的细胞存活率相似(94.6%、92.3%和93.6%;P=0.93)。趋势是 SF 与 DF 或离心分离的 ASCs 百分比更高(分别为 6.95%、4.63% 和 1.93%;P=0.06)。三种移植物的成脂标志物(脂肪连素、瘦素)相似(P=0.45)。与脂肪和 ASCs 相比,无论加工技术如何,SVF 中的组织重塑标志物最多。在 SVF 中,MMP9(2 倍)、EMMPRIN(2.5 倍)、endoglin(5 倍)和 IL-8 (1.5 倍)的相对表达量更高(p=0.45)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Generation of Functioning Platelets from Mature Megakaryocytes Derived from CD34+ Umbilical Cord Blood Cells. Advancements in Organoid Culture Technologies: Current Trends and Innovations. Establishment of Periodontal Ligament Stem Cell-like Cells Derived from Feeder-Free Cultured Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. The Effects of Different Developmental Stages on Bone Regeneration of Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells and Periodontal Ligament Cell Sheets In Vitro and Vivo. The Construction of Stem Cell-Induced Hepatocyte Model and Its Application in Evaluation of Developmental Hepatotoxicity of Environmental Pollutants.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1