Descriptive evaluation of a camera-based dairy cattle lameness detection technology.

IF 3.7 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Journal of Dairy Science Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI:10.3168/jds.2024-24851
D Swartz, E Shepley, K Parker Gaddis, J Burchard, G Cramer
{"title":"Descriptive evaluation of a camera-based dairy cattle lameness detection technology.","authors":"D Swartz, E Shepley, K Parker Gaddis, J Burchard, G Cramer","doi":"10.3168/jds.2024-24851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lameness in dairy cattle is a clinical sign of impaired locomotion, mainly caused by painful foot lesions, compromising the US dairy industry's economic, environmental, and social sustainability goals. Combining technology and on farm data may be a more precise and less labor-intensive lameness detection tool, particularly for early detection. The objective of this observational study was to describe the association between average weekly autonomous camera-based (AUTO) locomotion scores and hoof trimming (HT) data. The AUTO data were collected from 3 farms from April 2022 to March 2023. Historical farm HT data were collected from March 2016 to March 2023 and used to determine cow lesion history and date of HT event. The HT events were categorized as a regular HT (TRIM; n = 2290) or a HT with a lesion recorded (LESION; n = 670). Events with LESION were sub-categorized based on lesion category: digital dermatitis (DD; n = 276), sole ulcer (SU; n = 79), white line disease (WLD; n = 141), and other (n = 174). The data also contained the leg of the LESION, classified as front left (FL; n = 54), front right (FR; n = 146), rear left (RL; n = 281), or rear right (RR; n = 183) leg with 6 events missing the leg. Cows' HT histories were classified as follows: cows with no previous recorded instance of any lesion were classified as TRIM0 (n = 1554). The first instance of any hoof lesion was classified as LESION1 (n = 238). This classification was retained until a subsequent TRIM occurred - recorded as TRIM1 (n = 632). The next unique instance of any lesion following a TRIM1 was classified as LESION2 (n = 86). Any LESION events occurring after LESION1 or LESION2 without a subsequent TRIM were considered a hoof lesion recurrence and classified as LESIONRE1 (n = 164) and LESIONRE2 (n = 22), respectively. TRIM events after LESION2 or LESION2RE (n = 104) or LESION events after LESIONRE1 or LESIONRE2 were classified as LESION_OTHER (n = 160). The AUTO scores from -28 to -1 days prior to the HT event were summarized into weekly scores and included if cows had at least 1 observation per week in the 4 weeks before the event. For all weeks, LESION cows had a higher median AUTO score than TRIM cows. Cows with TRIM0 had the lowest and most consistent median weekly score compared to LESION and other TRIM classifications. Before HT cows with TRIM0 and TRIM1, both had median score increases of 1 across the 4 weeks, while the LESION categories had an increase of 4 to 8. Scores increased with each subsequent LESION event compared to the previous LESION event. Cows with SU lesions had the highest median score across the 4 weeks, WLD had the largest score increase, and DD had the lowest median score and score increase. When grouping a LESION event by leg the hoof lesion was found on, the AUTO scores for four groups displayed comparable median values. Due to the difference between TRIM and LESION events, this technology shows potential for the early detection of hoof lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":354,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dairy Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dairy Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2024-24851","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lameness in dairy cattle is a clinical sign of impaired locomotion, mainly caused by painful foot lesions, compromising the US dairy industry's economic, environmental, and social sustainability goals. Combining technology and on farm data may be a more precise and less labor-intensive lameness detection tool, particularly for early detection. The objective of this observational study was to describe the association between average weekly autonomous camera-based (AUTO) locomotion scores and hoof trimming (HT) data. The AUTO data were collected from 3 farms from April 2022 to March 2023. Historical farm HT data were collected from March 2016 to March 2023 and used to determine cow lesion history and date of HT event. The HT events were categorized as a regular HT (TRIM; n = 2290) or a HT with a lesion recorded (LESION; n = 670). Events with LESION were sub-categorized based on lesion category: digital dermatitis (DD; n = 276), sole ulcer (SU; n = 79), white line disease (WLD; n = 141), and other (n = 174). The data also contained the leg of the LESION, classified as front left (FL; n = 54), front right (FR; n = 146), rear left (RL; n = 281), or rear right (RR; n = 183) leg with 6 events missing the leg. Cows' HT histories were classified as follows: cows with no previous recorded instance of any lesion were classified as TRIM0 (n = 1554). The first instance of any hoof lesion was classified as LESION1 (n = 238). This classification was retained until a subsequent TRIM occurred - recorded as TRIM1 (n = 632). The next unique instance of any lesion following a TRIM1 was classified as LESION2 (n = 86). Any LESION events occurring after LESION1 or LESION2 without a subsequent TRIM were considered a hoof lesion recurrence and classified as LESIONRE1 (n = 164) and LESIONRE2 (n = 22), respectively. TRIM events after LESION2 or LESION2RE (n = 104) or LESION events after LESIONRE1 or LESIONRE2 were classified as LESION_OTHER (n = 160). The AUTO scores from -28 to -1 days prior to the HT event were summarized into weekly scores and included if cows had at least 1 observation per week in the 4 weeks before the event. For all weeks, LESION cows had a higher median AUTO score than TRIM cows. Cows with TRIM0 had the lowest and most consistent median weekly score compared to LESION and other TRIM classifications. Before HT cows with TRIM0 and TRIM1, both had median score increases of 1 across the 4 weeks, while the LESION categories had an increase of 4 to 8. Scores increased with each subsequent LESION event compared to the previous LESION event. Cows with SU lesions had the highest median score across the 4 weeks, WLD had the largest score increase, and DD had the lowest median score and score increase. When grouping a LESION event by leg the hoof lesion was found on, the AUTO scores for four groups displayed comparable median values. Due to the difference between TRIM and LESION events, this technology shows potential for the early detection of hoof lesions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对基于摄像头的奶牛跛足检测技术进行描述性评估。
奶牛跛足是运动能力受损的一种临床表现,主要由足部疼痛性病变引起,损害了美国奶牛业的经济、环境和社会可持续发展目标。将技术与牧场数据相结合可能是一种更精确、劳动密集程度更低的跛足检测工具,尤其适用于早期检测。这项观察性研究的目的是描述基于自动照相技术(AUTO)的每周平均运动评分与修蹄(HT)数据之间的关联。AUTO 数据收集自 2022 年 4 月至 2023 年 3 月的 3 个农场。从 2016 年 3 月至 2023 年 3 月收集了牧场 HT 历史数据,用于确定奶牛病变历史和 HT 事件日期。HT事件分为常规HT(TRIM;n = 2290)或有病变记录的HT(LESION;n = 670)。LESION事件根据病变类别进行了细分:数字皮炎(DD;n = 276)、足底溃疡(SU;n = 79)、白线病(WLD;n = 141)和其他(n = 174)。数据还包含LESION的腿部,分为前左腿(FL;n = 54)、前右腿(FR;n = 146)、后左腿(RL;n = 281)或后右腿(RR;n = 183),其中有6例缺失腿部。奶牛的HT病史分类如下:以前没有任何病变记录的奶牛被归类为TRIM0(n = 1554)。首次出现任何蹄部病变的奶牛被归类为 LESION1(n = 238)。这一分类一直保留到随后的 TRIM 发生--记录为 TRIM1(n = 632)。在 TRIM1 之后发生的任何病变的下一个唯一实例被归类为 LESION2(n = 86)。在 LESION1 或 LESION2 之后发生的任何 LESION 事件,如果没有随后进行 TRIM,则被视为蹄部病变复发,并分别归类为 LESIONRE1(n = 164)和 LESIONRE2(n = 22)。LESION2或LESION2RE(n = 104)后的TRIM事件或LESIONRE1或LESIONRE2后的LESION事件被归类为LESION_OTHER(n = 160)。将 HT 事件发生前 -28 天至 -1 天的 AUTO 评分汇总为周评分,如果奶牛在事件发生前 4 周内每周至少观察到 1 次,则将其纳入周评分。在所有周数中,LESION奶牛的AUTO评分中位数均高于TRIM奶牛。与 LESION 和其他 TRIM 分类的奶牛相比,TRIM0 的奶牛每周得分中位数最低且最稳定。在HT之前,TRIM0和TRIM1奶牛的4周得分中位数均增加了1分,而LESION类别的奶牛则增加了4至8分。与上一次LESION事件相比,每一次LESION事件的得分都会增加。有SU病变的奶牛在4周内的中位数得分最高,WLD的得分增幅最大,而DD的中位数得分和得分增幅均最低。当按牛蹄病变部位对LESION事件进行分组时,四组的AUTO评分显示出相似的中值。由于 TRIM 和 LESION 事件之间的差异,该技术显示出早期检测蹄部病变的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Dairy Science
Journal of Dairy Science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
17.10%
发文量
784
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the American Dairy Science Association®, Journal of Dairy Science® (JDS) is the leading peer-reviewed general dairy research journal in the world. JDS readers represent education, industry, and government agencies in more than 70 countries with interests in biochemistry, breeding, economics, engineering, environment, food science, genetics, microbiology, nutrition, pathology, physiology, processing, public health, quality assurance, and sanitation.
期刊最新文献
Development and evaluation of predictive models for pregnancy risk in UK dairy cows. Effect of thermal and non-thermal processing methods on the Structural and Functional Properties of Whey Protein from Donkey Milk. Genetic and environmental factors shaping goat milk oligosaccharide composition. Identification of nonsense variants in the genomes of 15 Murciano-Granadina bucks and analysis of their segregation in parent-offspring trios. Identifying strategies to enhance the milking and operator efficiency of herringbone and rotary parlor systems in Ireland.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1