Assessment of Tooth Shade Measurement Precision and Consistency with Digital Photography Calibration System.

IF 1.4 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Acta Stomatologica Croatica Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.15644/asc58/2/8
Barbara Delija Omazić, Dino Buković, Maja Žagar, Martina Šlaj, Davor Illeš
{"title":"Assessment of Tooth Shade Measurement Precision and Consistency with Digital Photography Calibration System.","authors":"Barbara Delija Omazić, Dino Buković, Maja Žagar, Martina Šlaj, Davor Illeš","doi":"10.15644/asc58/2/8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To ascertain the degree of precision and repeatability inherent in the \"capture to edit\" digital imaging system, namely the ColorChecker Passport Photo (X-Rite, MI, USA), and to juxtapose its performance against spectrophotometric assessments utilizing the Vita Easyshade® (Vita Zahnfabrik, H Rauter GmbH & Co. KG., Bad Sackingen, Germany) for the same set of teeth.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Eighty participants aged 19-25 were included in the study; all of them were Croatian students at the School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb. Color measurements of the maxillary right central incisors were performed in controlled, standardized laboratory conditions. The measurements were performed on calibrated digital photographs by an experienced clinician three times in a row, and L, a, and b of CIELAB color space values were recorded. The same procedure was performed using the Vita Easyshade 5.0 spectrophotometer (Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany) in \"Tooth single\" mode.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Cronbach's alpha was used as a repeatability measurement, thus revealing high consistency for both methods (α=0.94-1). Correlations were moderate (Pearson r=0.44-0.66 p<0.05). Testing confirmed that digital photography is inaccurate as spectrophotometry (p<0.05). An analysis of errors of means and their standard deviations revealed consistent discrepancies with minor deviations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The \"capture to edit\" method showed high consistency (Cronbach's α=0.94-0.96), and it exhibits comparability in terms of variability, reliability, and repeatability when compared to spectrophotometric measurement (VitaShade 5, VitaZahnfabrik). Disparities between the methods are evident and anticipated, yet they do not follow a consistently linear pattern. The combination of repeatability and consistency renders the \"capture to edit\" method a valuable tool for enhanced color mapping, thus facilitating comparisons between digital images.</p>","PeriodicalId":7154,"journal":{"name":"Acta Stomatologica Croatica","volume":"58 2","pages":"185-192"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11256871/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Stomatologica Croatica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15644/asc58/2/8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To ascertain the degree of precision and repeatability inherent in the "capture to edit" digital imaging system, namely the ColorChecker Passport Photo (X-Rite, MI, USA), and to juxtapose its performance against spectrophotometric assessments utilizing the Vita Easyshade® (Vita Zahnfabrik, H Rauter GmbH & Co. KG., Bad Sackingen, Germany) for the same set of teeth.

Materials and methods: Eighty participants aged 19-25 were included in the study; all of them were Croatian students at the School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb. Color measurements of the maxillary right central incisors were performed in controlled, standardized laboratory conditions. The measurements were performed on calibrated digital photographs by an experienced clinician three times in a row, and L, a, and b of CIELAB color space values were recorded. The same procedure was performed using the Vita Easyshade 5.0 spectrophotometer (Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany) in "Tooth single" mode.

Results: The Cronbach's alpha was used as a repeatability measurement, thus revealing high consistency for both methods (α=0.94-1). Correlations were moderate (Pearson r=0.44-0.66 p<0.05). Testing confirmed that digital photography is inaccurate as spectrophotometry (p<0.05). An analysis of errors of means and their standard deviations revealed consistent discrepancies with minor deviations.

Conclusion: The "capture to edit" method showed high consistency (Cronbach's α=0.94-0.96), and it exhibits comparability in terms of variability, reliability, and repeatability when compared to spectrophotometric measurement (VitaShade 5, VitaZahnfabrik). Disparities between the methods are evident and anticipated, yet they do not follow a consistently linear pattern. The combination of repeatability and consistency renders the "capture to edit" method a valuable tool for enhanced color mapping, thus facilitating comparisons between digital images.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用数码摄影校准系统评估牙色测量的精确度和一致性。
目标:确定 "捕捉到编辑 "数字成像系统,即 ColorChecker Passport Photo(X-Rite,美国密歇根州)固有的精确度和可重复性,并将其性能与使用 Vita Easyshade® (Vita Zahnfabrik,H Rauter GmbH & Co. KG.,德国巴特萨金根)对同一组牙齿进行的分光光度评估进行比较:参与研究的 80 名参与者年龄在 19-25 岁之间,均为萨格勒布大学牙科医学院的克罗地亚学生。上颌右中切牙的颜色测量是在受控的标准化实验室条件下进行的。测量由一名经验丰富的临床医师在校准过的数码照片上连续进行三次,并记录 CIELAB 色彩空间的 L、a 和 b 值。使用 Vita Easyshade 5.0 分光光度计(Vita Zahnfabrik,Bad Säckingen,德国)在 "牙齿单一 "模式下执行相同的程序:使用克朗巴赫α来测量重复性,结果显示两种方法的一致性都很高(α=0.94-1)。相关性适中(Pearson r=0.44-0.66 p):捕获编辑 "方法显示出较高的一致性(Cronbach's α=0.94-0.96),与分光光度测量法(VitaShade 5,VitaZahnfabrik)相比,在变异性、可靠性和重复性方面具有可比性。两种方法之间的差异是显而易见的,也是可以预见的,但它们并不遵循一致的线性模式。可重复性和一致性的结合使 "捕捉到编辑 "方法成为增强色彩映射的重要工具,从而促进了数字图像之间的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Stomatologica Croatica
Acta Stomatologica Croatica DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
28.60%
发文量
32
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Acta Stomatologica Croatica (ASCRO) is a leading scientific non-profit journal in the field of dental, oral and cranio-facial sciences during the past 44 years in Croatia. ASCRO publishes original scientific and clinical papers, preliminary communications, case reports, book reviews, letters to the editor and news. Review articles are published by invitation from the Editor-in-Chief by acclaimed professionals in distinct fields of dental medicine. All manuscripts are subjected to peer review process.
期刊最新文献
Age Determination Based on Open Apex Measurement in the Developing Dentition: Comparing the Accuracy of the Belgrade Age Formula (BAF) with the European Formula on a Bosnian Children Population. Differences between Doctors of Dental Medicine and Doctors of Medicine Awareness of Their Online Image and Perception Concerns: a Quantitative Cross-Sectional Study. Evaluation of the Bond Strength between the Acrylic Teeth and Reinforced or Non-reinforced Complete Denture Base. Exploring the Root Canal Morphology of Third Molars in the Bosnia and Herzegovina Population. Legal Dental Age Thresholds Estimation in Croatian Children and Adolescents: Accuracy of the Olze, Haavikko, and Demirjian Methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1