Roadmap for Research and Scholarship in General Surgery Residency Training: Report of the Research Subcommittee of Blue Ribbon Committee II on Surgical Education and Training.

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Annals of surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000006453
Mary T Hawn, Jeff B Matthews, Ginny L Bumgardner, James Economou, Kamal Itani, Rachel Kelz, Thomas Tracy, Martha A Zeiger
{"title":"Roadmap for Research and Scholarship in General Surgery Residency Training: Report of the Research Subcommittee of Blue Ribbon Committee II on Surgical Education and Training.","authors":"Mary T Hawn, Jeff B Matthews, Ginny L Bumgardner, James Economou, Kamal Itani, Rachel Kelz, Thomas Tracy, Martha A Zeiger","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To review the current state of research training during surgical residency and make recommendations commensurate with current surgical training and academic environment.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Research training has been a mainstay of academic surgical programs, yet the scientific disciplines have evolved significantly from the traditional years of bench research. It is time to reconsider how research training should prepare surgeons for future academic practice and ensure the foundational knowledge of research evidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of the Blue Ribbon Committee II, a research subcommittee was tasked to make recommendations on research training during surgical residency. Our 8-member panel brought diverse perspectives on the roles and goals of research training. We also sought input from a convenience sample of current and recent surgical residents on the impact of research training during their residency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified a lack of a common framework and foundational research training for all surgical residents. Participation in dedicated years of scholarly activity helped trainees meet several professional and personal goals. The lack of an integrated, dedicated research track may dissuade some medical school graduates from pursuing surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We recommend incorporating a minimum standard for all trainees and flexibility in dedicated scholarly training to meet the needs of future academic surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"29-33"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006453","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To review the current state of research training during surgical residency and make recommendations commensurate with current surgical training and academic environment.

Background: Research training has been a mainstay of academic surgical programs, yet the scientific disciplines have evolved significantly from the traditional years of bench research. It is time to reconsider how research training should prepare surgeons for future academic practice and ensure the foundational knowledge of research evidence.

Methods: As part of the Blue Ribbon Committee II, a research subcommittee was tasked to make recommendations on research training during surgical residency. Our 8-member panel brought diverse perspectives on the roles and goals of research training. We also sought input from a convenience sample of current and recent surgical residents on the impact of research training during their residency.

Results: We identified a lack of a common framework and foundational research training for all surgical residents. Participation in dedicated years of scholarly activity helped trainees meet several professional and personal goals. The lack of an integrated, dedicated research track may dissuade some medical school graduates from pursuing surgery.

Conclusions: We recommend incorporating a minimum standard for all trainees and flexibility in dedicated scholarly training to meet the needs of future academic surgeons.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
普外科住院医师培训研究与学术路线图:第二外科教育与培训蓝带委员会研究小组委员会报告。
目的回顾外科住院医师培训期间研究培训的现状,并提出与当前外科培训和学术环境相适应的建议:研究培训一直是外科学术项目的支柱,但科学学科已从传统的台架研究时代发生了重大演变。现在是时候重新考虑研究培训应如何为外科医生未来的学术实践做好准备,并确保研究证据的基础知识了:作为蓝丝带委员会II的一部分,研究小组委员会的任务是就外科住院医师培训期间的研究培训提出建议。我们的八人小组就研究培训的作用和目标提出了不同的观点。我们还就住院医师培训期间研究培训的影响征求了现任和新任外科住院医师的意见:结果:我们发现所有外科住院医生都缺乏一个共同的框架和基础研究培训。参加数年的专门学术活动有助于学员实现多个专业和个人目标。缺乏综合、专门的研究方向可能会阻碍一些医学院毕业生从事外科手术:我们建议为所有学员制定最低标准,并灵活安排专门的学术培训,以满足未来学术外科医生的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of surgery
Annals of surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
4.40%
发文量
687
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.
期刊最新文献
Defer, Share, or Drive the Decision: Empowering Patients with Varied Preferences to Engage in Decision-making (an Analysis from Alliance A231701CD). International Medical Graduates in Academic Cardiothoracic Surgery. Validation of the PANAMA-Score for Survival and Benefit of Adjuvant Therapy in Patients with Resected Pancreatic Cancer After Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX. Prevalence and Incidence of Oral Benzodiazepine Use in Hospitalized Surgical Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Seeing the Forest and the Trees: The Future of Robotic Surgery and the Path Forward.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1