Abbreviated MRI in the evaluation of dizziness: report turnaround times and impact on length of stay compared to CT, CTA, and conventional MRI.

IF 1.7 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Emergency Radiology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1007/s10140-024-02273-7
Long H Tu, Kyle Tegtmeyer, Irene Dixe de Oliveira Santo, Arjun K Venkatesh, Howard P Forman, Amit Mahajan, Edward R Melnick
{"title":"Abbreviated MRI in the evaluation of dizziness: report turnaround times and impact on length of stay compared to CT, CTA, and conventional MRI.","authors":"Long H Tu, Kyle Tegtmeyer, Irene Dixe de Oliveira Santo, Arjun K Venkatesh, Howard P Forman, Amit Mahajan, Edward R Melnick","doi":"10.1007/s10140-024-02273-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Neuroimaging is often used in the emergency department (ED) to evaluate for posterior circulation strokes in patients with dizziness, commonly with CT/CTA due to speed and availability. Although MRI offers more sensitive evaluation, it is less commonly used, in part due to slower turnaround times. We assess the potential for abbreviated MRI to improve reporting times and impact on length of stay (LOS) compared to conventional MRI (as well as CT/CTA) in the evaluation of acute dizziness.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of length of stay via LASSO regression for patients presenting to the ED with dizziness and discharged directly from the ED over 4 years (1/1/2018-12/31/2021), controlling for numerous patient-level and logistical factors. We additionally assessed turnaround time between order and final report for various imaging modalities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>14,204 patients were included in our analysis. Turnaround time for abbreviated MRI was significantly lower than for conventional MRI (4.40 h vs. 6.14 h, p < 0.001) with decreased impact on LOS (0.58 h vs. 2.02 h). Abbreviated MRI studies had longer turnaround time (4.40 h vs. 1.41 h, p < 0.001) and was associated with greater impact on ED LOS than non-contrast CT head (0.58 h vs. 0.00 h), however there was no significant difference in turnaround time compared to CTA head and neck (4.40 h vs. 3.86 h, p = 0.06) with similar effect on LOS (0.58 h vs. 0.53 h). Ordering both CTA and conventional MRI was associated with a greater-than-linear increase in LOS (additional 0.37 h); the same trend was not seen combining CTA and abbreviated MRI (additional 0.00 h).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the acute settings where MRI is available, abbreviated MRI protocols may improve turnaround times and LOS compared to conventional MRI protocols. Since recent guidelines recommend MRI over CT in the evaluation of dizziness, implementation of abbreviated MRI protocols has the potential to facilitate rapid access to preferred imaging, while minimizing impact on ED workflows.</p>","PeriodicalId":11623,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"705-711"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-024-02273-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Neuroimaging is often used in the emergency department (ED) to evaluate for posterior circulation strokes in patients with dizziness, commonly with CT/CTA due to speed and availability. Although MRI offers more sensitive evaluation, it is less commonly used, in part due to slower turnaround times. We assess the potential for abbreviated MRI to improve reporting times and impact on length of stay (LOS) compared to conventional MRI (as well as CT/CTA) in the evaluation of acute dizziness.

Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of length of stay via LASSO regression for patients presenting to the ED with dizziness and discharged directly from the ED over 4 years (1/1/2018-12/31/2021), controlling for numerous patient-level and logistical factors. We additionally assessed turnaround time between order and final report for various imaging modalities.

Results: 14,204 patients were included in our analysis. Turnaround time for abbreviated MRI was significantly lower than for conventional MRI (4.40 h vs. 6.14 h, p < 0.001) with decreased impact on LOS (0.58 h vs. 2.02 h). Abbreviated MRI studies had longer turnaround time (4.40 h vs. 1.41 h, p < 0.001) and was associated with greater impact on ED LOS than non-contrast CT head (0.58 h vs. 0.00 h), however there was no significant difference in turnaround time compared to CTA head and neck (4.40 h vs. 3.86 h, p = 0.06) with similar effect on LOS (0.58 h vs. 0.53 h). Ordering both CTA and conventional MRI was associated with a greater-than-linear increase in LOS (additional 0.37 h); the same trend was not seen combining CTA and abbreviated MRI (additional 0.00 h).

Conclusions: In the acute settings where MRI is available, abbreviated MRI protocols may improve turnaround times and LOS compared to conventional MRI protocols. Since recent guidelines recommend MRI over CT in the evaluation of dizziness, implementation of abbreviated MRI protocols has the potential to facilitate rapid access to preferred imaging, while minimizing impact on ED workflows.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
简略磁共振成像在头晕评估中的应用:与 CT、CTA 和传统磁共振成像相比,报告周转时间和对住院时间的影响。
目的:急诊科(ED)经常使用神经影像学检查来评估头晕患者的后循环脑卒中,由于速度快且可用性高,通常使用 CT/CTA。尽管核磁共振成像可提供更灵敏的评估,但却不常用,部分原因是周转时间较慢。与常规 MRI(以及 CT/CTA)相比,我们评估了简略 MRI 在评估急性头晕时改善报告时间的潜力以及对住院时间(LOS)的影响:我们通过 LASSO 回归法对 4 年内(1/1/2018-12/31/2021)因头晕到急诊科就诊并直接出院的患者的住院时间进行了回顾性分析,并控制了许多患者水平和后勤因素。我们还评估了各种成像模式从下单到最终报告的周转时间:我们的分析共纳入了 14204 名患者。简略核磁共振成像的周转时间明显低于传统核磁共振成像(4.40 小时对 6.14 小时,P 结论:简略核磁共振成像的周转时间明显低于传统核磁共振成像(4.40 小时对 6.14 小时,P 结论):在可使用磁共振成像的急诊环境中,与传统磁共振成像方案相比,简略磁共振成像方案可缩短周转时间和 LOS。由于最近的指南建议在评估头晕时使用 MRI 而不是 CT,因此实施简略 MRI 方案有可能促进快速获得首选成像,同时最大限度地减少对急诊室工作流程的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Emergency Radiology
Emergency Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
98
期刊介绍: To advance and improve the radiologic aspects of emergency careTo establish Emergency Radiology as an area of special interest in the field of diagnostic imagingTo improve methods of education in Emergency RadiologyTo provide, through formal meetings, a mechanism for presentation of scientific papers on various aspects of Emergency Radiology and continuing educationTo promote research in Emergency Radiology by clinical and basic science investigators, including residents and other traineesTo act as the resource body on Emergency Radiology for those interested in emergency patient care Members of the American Society of Emergency Radiology (ASER) receive the Emergency Radiology journal as a benefit of membership!
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Exploring the role of CT scouts in expediting MRI in acute stroke. Splenic artery embolization for variceal bleeding in portal hypertension: a systematic review and metanalysis. Radiology resident proficiency in pediatric trauma cases: a comparative analysis based on trauma center status using the WIDI SIM exam. Correction to: Emergency imaging protocols for pregnant patients: a multiinstitutional and multi- specialty comparison of physician education. Reliability of distal radius fracture classification systems: a CT based study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1