Misinterpretations about CT numbers, material decomposition, and elemental quantification.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Radiology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-21 DOI:10.1007/s00330-024-10934-x
Aria M Salyapongse, Timothy P Szczykutowicz
{"title":"Misinterpretations about CT numbers, material decomposition, and elemental quantification.","authors":"Aria M Salyapongse, Timothy P Szczykutowicz","doi":"10.1007/s00330-024-10934-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quantitative CT imaging, particularly iodine and calcium quantification, is an important CT-based biomarker.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study quantifies sources of errors in quantitative CT imaging in both single-energy and spectral CT.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This work examines the theoretical relationship between CT numbers, linear attenuation coefficient, and material quantification. We derive four understandings: (1) CT numbers are not proportional with element mass in vivo, (2) CT numbers are proportional with element mass only when contained in a voxel of pure water, (3) iodine-water material decomposition is never accurate in vivo, and (4) for error-free material decomposition a voxel must only consist of the basis decomposition vectors. Misinterpretation-based errors are calculated using the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) XCOM database for: tissue chemical compositions, clinical concentrations of hydroxyapatite (HAP), and iodine. Quantification errors are also demonstrated experimentally using phantoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In single-energy CT, misinterpretation-induced errors for HAP density in adipose, muscle, lung, soft tissue, and blood ranged from 0-132%, i.e., a mass error of 0-749 mg/cm<sup>3</sup>. In spectral CT, errors with iodine in the same tissues resulted in a range of < 0.1-33% error, resulting in a mass error of < 0.1-1.2 mg/mL.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our work demonstrates material quantification is fundamentally limited when measured in vivo due to measurement conditions differing from assumed and the errors are at or above detection limits for bone mineral density (BMD) and spectral iodine quantification. To define CT-derived biomarkers, the errors we demonstrate should either be avoided or built into uncertainty bounds.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance statement: </strong>Improving error bounds in quantitative CT biomarkers, specifically in iodine and BMD quantification, could lead to improvements in clinical care aspects based on quantitative CT.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>CT numbers are only proportional with element mass only when contained in a voxel of pure water, therefore iodine-water material decomposition is never accurate in vivo. Misinterpretation-induced errors ranged from 0-132% for HAP density and < 0.1-33% in spectral CT with iodine. For error-free material decomposition, a voxel must only consist of the basis decomposition vectors.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"862-870"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11782396/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10934-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Quantitative CT imaging, particularly iodine and calcium quantification, is an important CT-based biomarker.

Purpose: This study quantifies sources of errors in quantitative CT imaging in both single-energy and spectral CT.

Materials and methods: This work examines the theoretical relationship between CT numbers, linear attenuation coefficient, and material quantification. We derive four understandings: (1) CT numbers are not proportional with element mass in vivo, (2) CT numbers are proportional with element mass only when contained in a voxel of pure water, (3) iodine-water material decomposition is never accurate in vivo, and (4) for error-free material decomposition a voxel must only consist of the basis decomposition vectors. Misinterpretation-based errors are calculated using the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) XCOM database for: tissue chemical compositions, clinical concentrations of hydroxyapatite (HAP), and iodine. Quantification errors are also demonstrated experimentally using phantoms.

Results: In single-energy CT, misinterpretation-induced errors for HAP density in adipose, muscle, lung, soft tissue, and blood ranged from 0-132%, i.e., a mass error of 0-749 mg/cm3. In spectral CT, errors with iodine in the same tissues resulted in a range of < 0.1-33% error, resulting in a mass error of < 0.1-1.2 mg/mL.

Conclusion: Our work demonstrates material quantification is fundamentally limited when measured in vivo due to measurement conditions differing from assumed and the errors are at or above detection limits for bone mineral density (BMD) and spectral iodine quantification. To define CT-derived biomarkers, the errors we demonstrate should either be avoided or built into uncertainty bounds.

Clinical relevance statement: Improving error bounds in quantitative CT biomarkers, specifically in iodine and BMD quantification, could lead to improvements in clinical care aspects based on quantitative CT.

Key points: CT numbers are only proportional with element mass only when contained in a voxel of pure water, therefore iodine-water material decomposition is never accurate in vivo. Misinterpretation-induced errors ranged from 0-132% for HAP density and < 0.1-33% in spectral CT with iodine. For error-free material decomposition, a voxel must only consist of the basis decomposition vectors.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对 CT 数字、材料分解和元素定量的误读。
背景:定量 CT 成像,尤其是碘和钙定量,是一种重要的基于 CT 的生物标志物。目的:本研究量化了单能 CT 和光谱 CT 定量 CT 成像的误差来源:本研究探讨了 CT 数字、线性衰减系数和材料定量之间的理论关系。我们得出四点认识:(1) CT 数字在体内与元素质量不成正比;(2) CT 数字只有在包含在纯水体素中时才与元素质量成正比;(3) 碘水材料分解在体内永远不会准确;(4) 要实现无差错材料分解,体素必须仅由基础分解矢量组成。利用美国国家标准与技术研究院(NIST)的 XCOM 数据库计算了基于误读的误差:组织化学成分、羟基磷灰石(HAP)和碘的临床浓度。此外,还使用模型进行了定量误差实验:结果:在单能 CT 中,脂肪、肌肉、肺、软组织和血液中 HAP 密度的误读误差范围为 0-132%,即质量误差为 0-749 mg/cm3。在光谱 CT 中,相同组织中碘的误差范围为结论:我们的工作表明,由于测量条件与假定条件不同,在体内测量时,材料定量会受到根本限制,而且误差达到或超过骨矿物质密度 (BMD) 和光谱碘定量的检测限。为了定义 CT 衍生生物标记物,我们所展示的误差应予以避免或纳入不确定性范围:临床相关性声明:改进定量 CT 生物标志物的误差范围,特别是碘和 BMD 定量,可以改善基于定量 CT 的临床护理方面:CT数字只有在包含在纯水体素中时才与元素质量成正比,因此碘-水物质分解在体内永远不会准确。误读导致的误差范围为 0-132% 的 HAP 密度和
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
期刊最新文献
Deep learning-based breast cancer diagnosis in breast MRI: systematic review and meta-analysis. An international survey of diffusion and perfusion magnetic resonance imaging implementation in the head and neck. Age-stratified deep learning model for thyroid tumor classification: a multicenter diagnostic study. High-resolution deep learning reconstruction for coronary CTA: compared efficacy of stenosis evaluation with other methods at in vitro and in vivo studies. Lower extremity MRI: are their requests always appropriate in France?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1