Filipa Jácome, Tiago Costa-Pereira, Ana Dionísio, Joel Sousa, Andreia Coelho, Armando Mansilha
{"title":"Contemporary open surgical approaches for the management of carotid stenosis: a comprehensive review.","authors":"Filipa Jácome, Tiago Costa-Pereira, Ana Dionísio, Joel Sousa, Andreia Coelho, Armando Mansilha","doi":"10.23736/S0392-9590.24.05228-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to provide an overview on contemporary open surgical approaches for the management of carotid artery stenosis. A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify and categorize open surgery intervention techniques for the management of carotid artery stenosis, focusing on the benefits and drawbacks of each technique. Five surgical techniques for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) have been described: CEA with primary closure, CEA with patch closure, CEA by eversion technique, CEA by modified eversion technique and CEA by partial eversion. Evidence has reported significantly higher rates of perioperative complications after CEA with primary closure, including 30-days stroke rate and late restenosis. Although more recent techniques have been reported to provide superior outcomes, electing the best surgical technique is still a matter of debate. Also, CEA using a mini-skin incision has been associated to lower risk of cranial/cervical nerve injury and shorter length of hospital stay. The selection of the surgical intervention should be tailored and have into consideration individual patient characteristics, clinical considerations, surgeon preference and surgical team expertise. Further large-scale randomized clinical trials are needed to support more robust decisions on the choice of contemporary open surgical approaches to manage carotid stenosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":13709,"journal":{"name":"International Angiology","volume":" ","pages":"348-357"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Angiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0392-9590.24.05228-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aims to provide an overview on contemporary open surgical approaches for the management of carotid artery stenosis. A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify and categorize open surgery intervention techniques for the management of carotid artery stenosis, focusing on the benefits and drawbacks of each technique. Five surgical techniques for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) have been described: CEA with primary closure, CEA with patch closure, CEA by eversion technique, CEA by modified eversion technique and CEA by partial eversion. Evidence has reported significantly higher rates of perioperative complications after CEA with primary closure, including 30-days stroke rate and late restenosis. Although more recent techniques have been reported to provide superior outcomes, electing the best surgical technique is still a matter of debate. Also, CEA using a mini-skin incision has been associated to lower risk of cranial/cervical nerve injury and shorter length of hospital stay. The selection of the surgical intervention should be tailored and have into consideration individual patient characteristics, clinical considerations, surgeon preference and surgical team expertise. Further large-scale randomized clinical trials are needed to support more robust decisions on the choice of contemporary open surgical approaches to manage carotid stenosis.
本研究旨在概述当代治疗颈动脉狭窄的开放手术方法。研究人员通过全面的文献检索,对用于治疗颈动脉狭窄的开放手术干预技术进行了识别和分类,重点研究了每种技术的优点和缺点。目前已介绍了五种颈动脉内膜剥脱术(CEA)的手术技术:主要闭合术 CEA、补片闭合术 CEA、倒转术 CEA、改良倒转术 CEA 和部分倒转术 CEA。有证据显示,初次闭合 CEA 术后围手术期并发症的发生率明显较高,包括 30 天卒中率和晚期再狭窄。尽管有报道称最新的技术可提供更好的疗效,但选择最佳手术技术仍是一个争论不休的问题。此外,使用微型皮肤切口进行 CEA 与降低颅/颈神经损伤风险和缩短住院时间有关。手术干预的选择应量体裁衣,并考虑到患者的个体特征、临床因素、外科医生的偏好和手术团队的专业知识。需要进一步开展大规模随机临床试验,以支持在选择当代开放手术方法治疗颈动脉狭窄方面做出更可靠的决定。
期刊介绍:
International Angiology publishes scientific papers on angiology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work. Duties and responsibilities of all the subjects involved in the editorial process are summarized at Publication ethics. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE).