Comparative analysis of 'functional excision' of heterotopic ossification around the hip - computed tomography (CT) navigation guided versus conventional excision.
{"title":"Comparative analysis of 'functional excision' of heterotopic ossification around the hip - computed tomography (CT) navigation guided versus conventional excision.","authors":"Dhanasekaran Soundarrajan, Helawi Tewabe Fanta, Rithika Singh, Palanisami Dhanasekararaja, Natesan Rajkumar, Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran","doi":"10.1007/s00264-024-06256-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aim to analyse and compare the efficacy of the excision of HO around the hip with and without CT-guided navigation. We also aim to compare the functional outcome between CT navigation guided versus conventional excision of HO.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 2015 to 2022. There were 23 patients (24 hips) in the final cohort. Intraoperative CT navigation guided excision was performed in 7 hips and conventional excision of HO was done in 17 hips. The HO was classified by Brooker's grading in radiographs. CT scan was taken preoperatively in all patients to exactly identify the volume, location and preoperative planning. The functional outcome was analysed according to Harris Hip Score (HHS) and International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT) for self-ambulatory patients and improvement in the sitting or nursing care was assessed in patients mobilising with wheelchair or walker support. Any complications or recurrence noted postoperatively and in follow-up were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean follow-up was 41.2 months in the CT navigation-guided excision group and 55 months in the conventional excision group. According to Brooker's grading, grade IV was present in 20 hips and grade III in four hips. Twelve patients were self-ambulatory and the other 12 patients were requiring support for mobilisation. There was a significant improvement in the HHS from 21.3 ± 3.7, 18.3 ± 2.5 preoperatively to 75.2 ± 8.3, 72.2 ± 4.3 postoperatively in the CT navigation guided and conventional group respectively (p < 0.001) in the self-ambulatory group. There was one anterior wall and one partial posterior wall fracture in the conventional group. One patient in the conventional group had a deep infection and recurrence. One patient had a superficial infection and another had superficial vein thrombosis in the CT guided excision group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intraoperative CT navigation helps to exactly localize the HO and facilitates safe excision. Functional excision of the HO leads to better nursing care and functional outcomes between both groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":14450,"journal":{"name":"International Orthopaedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-024-06256-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: We aim to analyse and compare the efficacy of the excision of HO around the hip with and without CT-guided navigation. We also aim to compare the functional outcome between CT navigation guided versus conventional excision of HO.
Patients and methods: This study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 2015 to 2022. There were 23 patients (24 hips) in the final cohort. Intraoperative CT navigation guided excision was performed in 7 hips and conventional excision of HO was done in 17 hips. The HO was classified by Brooker's grading in radiographs. CT scan was taken preoperatively in all patients to exactly identify the volume, location and preoperative planning. The functional outcome was analysed according to Harris Hip Score (HHS) and International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT) for self-ambulatory patients and improvement in the sitting or nursing care was assessed in patients mobilising with wheelchair or walker support. Any complications or recurrence noted postoperatively and in follow-up were recorded.
Results: The mean follow-up was 41.2 months in the CT navigation-guided excision group and 55 months in the conventional excision group. According to Brooker's grading, grade IV was present in 20 hips and grade III in four hips. Twelve patients were self-ambulatory and the other 12 patients were requiring support for mobilisation. There was a significant improvement in the HHS from 21.3 ± 3.7, 18.3 ± 2.5 preoperatively to 75.2 ± 8.3, 72.2 ± 4.3 postoperatively in the CT navigation guided and conventional group respectively (p < 0.001) in the self-ambulatory group. There was one anterior wall and one partial posterior wall fracture in the conventional group. One patient in the conventional group had a deep infection and recurrence. One patient had a superficial infection and another had superficial vein thrombosis in the CT guided excision group.
Conclusion: Intraoperative CT navigation helps to exactly localize the HO and facilitates safe excision. Functional excision of the HO leads to better nursing care and functional outcomes between both groups.
期刊介绍:
International Orthopaedics, the Official Journal of the Société Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie (SICOT) , publishes original papers from all over the world. The articles deal with clinical orthopaedic surgery or basic research directly connected with orthopaedic surgery. International Orthopaedics will also link all the members of SICOT by means of an insert that will be concerned with SICOT matters.
Finally, it is expected that news and information regarding all aspects of orthopaedic surgery, including meetings, panels, instructional courses, etc. will be brought to the attention of the readers.
Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.
Reports of animal experiments must state that the "Principles of laboratory animal care" (NIH publication No. 85-23, revised 1985) were followed, as well as specific national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals) where applicable.
The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfil the above-mentioned requirements.