Effect of wall thickness on shape accuracy of hollow zirconia artificial teeth fabricated by a 3D printer.

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI:10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_23_00300
Hiro Kobayashi, Franz Sebastian Schwindling, Akinori Tasaka, Peter Rammelsberg, Shuichiro Yamashita, Stefan Rues
{"title":"Effect of wall thickness on shape accuracy of hollow zirconia artificial teeth fabricated by a 3D printer.","authors":"Hiro Kobayashi, Franz Sebastian Schwindling, Akinori Tasaka, Peter Rammelsberg, Shuichiro Yamashita, Stefan Rues","doi":"10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_23_00300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to analyze how the wall thickness of 3D-printed hollow zirconia teeth affects shape accuracy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Datasets with measurement points were created for different artificial teeth resembling the mandibular right first molar (Geomagic Design X, 3D Systems). Reference distances were 9.8 mm for mesio-distal direction (M-D), 10.9 mm for bucco-lingual direction (B-L), 7.0 mm for MB-BB and DB-BB, and 4.5 mm for ML-LB and DL-LB. The outer geometry was identical for all artificial teeth with wall thicknesses of 0.30, 0.50, 0.75, and 1.00 mm. Twenty zirconia teeth were fabricated using a 3D printer (CeraFab 7500 Dental, Lithoz) for each group and sintered before support removal. After performing analog distance measurements using a micrometer screw, the digital distance measurements and angular deviations between measurement points on 3D scans were analyzed. Possible effects were investigated using nonparametric ANOVA, followed by Tukey's honest significant difference (HSD) test for multiple comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The shape accuracy was acceptable for artificial teeth with wall thicknesses of ≥0.5 mm. The largest distance deviation was observed for a wall thickness of 0.3 mm. In particular, DB-BB showed a median deviation of >56.2 µm, which is significantly larger than that for other test groups, ranging from 7.4-9.5 µm (P < 0.05). In most cases, angular deviations were the largest for teeth with 0.3-mm wall thickness (11.6°) and remained below 5.0° for the other test groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Acceptable accuracy was obtained for artificial teeth with wall thicknesses of at least 0.5 mm.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_23_00300","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to analyze how the wall thickness of 3D-printed hollow zirconia teeth affects shape accuracy.

Methods: Datasets with measurement points were created for different artificial teeth resembling the mandibular right first molar (Geomagic Design X, 3D Systems). Reference distances were 9.8 mm for mesio-distal direction (M-D), 10.9 mm for bucco-lingual direction (B-L), 7.0 mm for MB-BB and DB-BB, and 4.5 mm for ML-LB and DL-LB. The outer geometry was identical for all artificial teeth with wall thicknesses of 0.30, 0.50, 0.75, and 1.00 mm. Twenty zirconia teeth were fabricated using a 3D printer (CeraFab 7500 Dental, Lithoz) for each group and sintered before support removal. After performing analog distance measurements using a micrometer screw, the digital distance measurements and angular deviations between measurement points on 3D scans were analyzed. Possible effects were investigated using nonparametric ANOVA, followed by Tukey's honest significant difference (HSD) test for multiple comparisons.

Results: The shape accuracy was acceptable for artificial teeth with wall thicknesses of ≥0.5 mm. The largest distance deviation was observed for a wall thickness of 0.3 mm. In particular, DB-BB showed a median deviation of >56.2 µm, which is significantly larger than that for other test groups, ranging from 7.4-9.5 µm (P < 0.05). In most cases, angular deviations were the largest for teeth with 0.3-mm wall thickness (11.6°) and remained below 5.0° for the other test groups.

Conclusions: Acceptable accuracy was obtained for artificial teeth with wall thicknesses of at least 0.5 mm.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
壁厚对 3D 打印机制造的空心氧化锆人工牙形状精度的影响。
目的:本研究旨在分析三维打印空心氧化锆牙齿的壁厚如何影响形状精度:为与下颌右第一臼齿相似的不同人工牙齿创建了带有测量点的数据集(Geomagic Design X,3D Systems)。参考距离分别为:中距方向(M-D)9.8 毫米,颊舌方向(B-L)10.9 毫米,MB-BB 和 DB-BB 7.0 毫米,ML-LB 和 DL-LB 4.5 毫米。所有人工牙齿的外部几何形状相同,壁厚分别为 0.30、0.50、0.75 和 1.00 毫米。每组使用 3D 打印机(CeraFab 7500 Dental,Lithoz)制作 20 颗氧化锆牙,并在去除支撑物前进行烧结。在使用千分尺螺钉进行模拟距离测量后,分析了三维扫描上测量点之间的数字距离测量值和角度偏差。使用非参数方差分析研究了可能的影响,然后使用 Tukey's 诚实显著性差异(HSD)检验进行多重比较:结果:壁厚≥0.5 毫米的人工牙齿的形状精度是可以接受的。壁厚为 0.3 毫米时,距离偏差最大。尤其是 DB-BB 的中位偏差大于 56.2 µm,明显大于其他测试组的中位偏差(7.4-9.5 µm)(P < 0.05)。在大多数情况下,壁厚为 0.3 毫米的牙齿的角度偏差最大(11.6°),而其他测试组的角度偏差保持在 5.0°以下:结论:壁厚至少为 0.5 毫米的人工牙齿可获得可接受的精确度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
期刊最新文献
Hyperbaric oxygen treatment promotes tendon-bone interface healing in a rabbit model of rotator cuff tears. Oxygen-ozone therapy for myocardial ischemic stroke and cardiovascular disorders. Comparative study on the anti-inflammatory and protective effects of different oxygen therapy regimens on lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in mice. Heme oxygenase/carbon monoxide system and development of the heart. Hyperbaric oxygen for moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: outcomes 5-8 years after injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1