Tina R. Goldstein PhD , Betsy D. Kennard PsyD, ABPP , Giovanna Porta MS , Alisha O. Miller PhD , Karen Aguilar BA , Katelyn Bigley LPC, MSCP , Rachel A. Vaughn-Coaxum PhD , Dana L. McMakin PhD , Antoine Douaihy MD , Satish Iyengar PhD , Candice L. Biernesser PhD , Jamie Zelazny PhD, MPH, RN , David A. Brent MD
{"title":"Bridging Gaps in Care Following Hospitalization for Suicidal Adolescents: As Safe As Possible (ASAP) and BRITE App","authors":"Tina R. Goldstein PhD , Betsy D. Kennard PsyD, ABPP , Giovanna Porta MS , Alisha O. Miller PhD , Karen Aguilar BA , Katelyn Bigley LPC, MSCP , Rachel A. Vaughn-Coaxum PhD , Dana L. McMakin PhD , Antoine Douaihy MD , Satish Iyengar PhD , Candice L. Biernesser PhD , Jamie Zelazny PhD, MPH, RN , David A. Brent MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jaac.2024.06.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We present results from a 2-site, randomized clinical trial to assess the efficacy of a brief intervention (As Safe As Possible [ASAP]), a safety plan phone application (BRITE), and their combination on suicide attempts, suicidal ideation, non-suicidal self-injury, re-hospitalizations. and suicidal events among adolescents.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Adolescents (n= 240; 12-17 years of age) who were hospitalized for suicidal ideation with plan and/or intent, and/or suicide attempt, were assigned to 1 of 4 treatment conditions in a 2 by 2 design: ASAP+BRITE app+treatment as usual (TAU); (2) BRITE+TAU; (3) ASAP+TAU; and (4) TAU alone. Independent evaluators assessed suicidal ideation and behavior at 4, 12, and 24 weeks using the Columbia–Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) and re-hospitalization using the Child and Adolescent Services Assessment (CASA).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>No group differences were found on primary outcomes, except that ASAP participants were less likely to be re-hospitalized over 6 months (15.6%, vs 26.5%, <em>p</em> = .046). Participants hospitalized for an attempt and assigned to BRITE had a lower rate of subsequent attempts (odds ratio [OR] = 0.16, <em>p</em> = .01) and a greater time to attempt (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.20, <em>p</em> = .02). ASAP+BRITE, albeit not statistically significant, was most consistently associated with a reduction (60% reduction) in suicide attempts.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ASAP, BRITE, and their combination are equally effective at decreasing risk for suicidal events 6 months post hospital discharge among suicidal adolescents; the ASAP intervention (with or without BRITE) was associated with lower rates of re-hospitalization. The BRITE app in youth hospitalized for suicide attempt had promising outcomes in regard to future attempts.</div></div><div><h3>Plain language summary</h3><div>This randomized clinical trial examined the efficacy of brief intervention and/or a safety plan phone application for suicide prevention after discharge. A total of 240 youth aged 12 to 17 years of age who were hospitalized at 2 inpatient psychiatric facilities for suicidal thoughts or behaviors were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatment conditions: a brief intervention (As Safe As Possible, ASAP), a safety planning phone app (BRITE), their combination, or treatment as usual and followed over 6 months post-hospitalization. Findings indicate ASAP, BRITE, and their combination are equally effective at decreasing risk for suicidal events over 6 months posthospital discharge. Lower rehospitalization rates were associated with ASAP, whereas BRITE was associated with lower risk of suicide attempt over follow-up among those hospitalized for attempt.</div></div><div><h3>Diversity & Inclusion Statement</h3><div>We worked to ensure sex and gender balance in the recruitment of human participants. We worked to ensure race, ethnic, and/or other types of diversity in the recruitment of human participants. We worked to ensure that the study questionnaires were prepared in an inclusive way. The research was performed with permission from the University of Pittsburgh Institutional Review Board and the University of Texas Institutional Review Board. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented sexual and/or gender groups in science. One or more of the authors of this paper received support from a program designed to increase minority representation in science. We actively worked to promote sex and gender balance in our author group. We actively worked to promote inclusion of historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science in our author group. The author list of this paper includes contributors from the location and/or community where the research was conducted who participated in the data collection, design, analysis, and/or interpretation of the work.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical trial registration information</h3><div>Establishing Efficacy of an Inpatient Intervention and Phone App to Reduce Suicidal Risk (ASAP+BRITE); <span><span>https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03825588</span><svg><path></path></svg></span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":17186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","volume":"64 5","pages":"Pages 612-624"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890856724003617","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
We present results from a 2-site, randomized clinical trial to assess the efficacy of a brief intervention (As Safe As Possible [ASAP]), a safety plan phone application (BRITE), and their combination on suicide attempts, suicidal ideation, non-suicidal self-injury, re-hospitalizations. and suicidal events among adolescents.
Method
Adolescents (n= 240; 12-17 years of age) who were hospitalized for suicidal ideation with plan and/or intent, and/or suicide attempt, were assigned to 1 of 4 treatment conditions in a 2 by 2 design: ASAP+BRITE app+treatment as usual (TAU); (2) BRITE+TAU; (3) ASAP+TAU; and (4) TAU alone. Independent evaluators assessed suicidal ideation and behavior at 4, 12, and 24 weeks using the Columbia–Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) and re-hospitalization using the Child and Adolescent Services Assessment (CASA).
Results
No group differences were found on primary outcomes, except that ASAP participants were less likely to be re-hospitalized over 6 months (15.6%, vs 26.5%, p = .046). Participants hospitalized for an attempt and assigned to BRITE had a lower rate of subsequent attempts (odds ratio [OR] = 0.16, p = .01) and a greater time to attempt (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.20, p = .02). ASAP+BRITE, albeit not statistically significant, was most consistently associated with a reduction (60% reduction) in suicide attempts.
Conclusion
ASAP, BRITE, and their combination are equally effective at decreasing risk for suicidal events 6 months post hospital discharge among suicidal adolescents; the ASAP intervention (with or without BRITE) was associated with lower rates of re-hospitalization. The BRITE app in youth hospitalized for suicide attempt had promising outcomes in regard to future attempts.
Plain language summary
This randomized clinical trial examined the efficacy of brief intervention and/or a safety plan phone application for suicide prevention after discharge. A total of 240 youth aged 12 to 17 years of age who were hospitalized at 2 inpatient psychiatric facilities for suicidal thoughts or behaviors were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatment conditions: a brief intervention (As Safe As Possible, ASAP), a safety planning phone app (BRITE), their combination, or treatment as usual and followed over 6 months post-hospitalization. Findings indicate ASAP, BRITE, and their combination are equally effective at decreasing risk for suicidal events over 6 months posthospital discharge. Lower rehospitalization rates were associated with ASAP, whereas BRITE was associated with lower risk of suicide attempt over follow-up among those hospitalized for attempt.
Diversity & Inclusion Statement
We worked to ensure sex and gender balance in the recruitment of human participants. We worked to ensure race, ethnic, and/or other types of diversity in the recruitment of human participants. We worked to ensure that the study questionnaires were prepared in an inclusive way. The research was performed with permission from the University of Pittsburgh Institutional Review Board and the University of Texas Institutional Review Board. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented sexual and/or gender groups in science. One or more of the authors of this paper received support from a program designed to increase minority representation in science. We actively worked to promote sex and gender balance in our author group. We actively worked to promote inclusion of historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science in our author group. The author list of this paper includes contributors from the location and/or community where the research was conducted who participated in the data collection, design, analysis, and/or interpretation of the work.
Clinical trial registration information
Establishing Efficacy of an Inpatient Intervention and Phone App to Reduce Suicidal Risk (ASAP+BRITE); https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03825588
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (JAACAP) is dedicated to advancing the field of child and adolescent psychiatry through the publication of original research and papers of theoretical, scientific, and clinical significance. Our primary focus is on the mental health of children, adolescents, and families.
We welcome unpublished manuscripts that explore various perspectives, ranging from genetic, epidemiological, neurobiological, and psychopathological research, to cognitive, behavioral, psychodynamic, and other psychotherapeutic investigations. We also encourage submissions that delve into parent-child, interpersonal, and family research, as well as clinical and empirical studies conducted in inpatient, outpatient, consultation-liaison, and school-based settings.
In addition to publishing research, we aim to promote the well-being of children and families by featuring scholarly papers on topics such as health policy, legislation, advocacy, culture, society, and service provision in relation to mental health.
At JAACAP, we strive to foster collaboration and dialogue among researchers, clinicians, and policy-makers in order to enhance our understanding and approach to child and adolescent mental health.