Building a programme theory of a specialist paediatric palliative and hospice care programme: development process and methodological reflection.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Palliative Care Pub Date : 2024-07-20 DOI:10.1186/s12904-024-01492-6
Martin Wallner, Daniela Haselmayer, Martin Nagl-Cupal, Jasmin Eppel-Meichlinger, Hanna Mayer
{"title":"Building a programme theory of a specialist paediatric palliative and hospice care programme: development process and methodological reflection.","authors":"Martin Wallner, Daniela Haselmayer, Martin Nagl-Cupal, Jasmin Eppel-Meichlinger, Hanna Mayer","doi":"10.1186/s12904-024-01492-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Paediatric palliative and hospice care aims to improve the quality of life of children with life-limiting and life-threatening conditions and their families. The number of these patients has risen significantly in recent years, resulting in an increased need for palliative care for this population. Although the need for paediatric palliative and hospice care is growing, meaningful outcome evaluation to demonstrate its effectiveness as a complex healthcare intervention is in its early stages. For complex interventions (programmes), theory-based evaluations have grown in prominence in recent years. They seek to understand how and why an intervention works by uncovering its underlying mechanisms by means of programme theory. To support both outcome evaluation in paediatric palliative care and a reflective practice of programme theorizing, we aimed to describe the construction of a programme theory for a specialist paediatric palliative and hospice care programme in Austria and to offer a reflective account of its development process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We drew on a combination of theory-based evaluation frameworks to construct a programme theory consisting of an action and a change component. Through multiple iterations, incorporating different stakeholders' perspectives and drawing on different sources of knowledge and theory, we theorized how and why the programme likely achieves its intended outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The programme theory outlines the proposed chains of events, causal mechanisms and outcomes of a specialist paediatric palliative and hospice care programme for children and families in several areas corresponding to its main conceptual tenets. Through a range of activities and interventions, the programme triggers coping and adaptation mechanisms that ultimately contribute to family and child wellbeing in physical, psychological, social, and spiritual dimensions. Established trust and partnership between children/families and healthcare professionals as well as a person-centered and family-centered approach were identified as enabling factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings provide insights into how a specialized paediatric palliative and hospice care programme works to achieve its intended outcomes for children and families. This helps demonstrate its impact, contributing to meaningful outcome evaluation and service improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":48945,"journal":{"name":"BMC Palliative Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11264908/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-024-01492-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Paediatric palliative and hospice care aims to improve the quality of life of children with life-limiting and life-threatening conditions and their families. The number of these patients has risen significantly in recent years, resulting in an increased need for palliative care for this population. Although the need for paediatric palliative and hospice care is growing, meaningful outcome evaluation to demonstrate its effectiveness as a complex healthcare intervention is in its early stages. For complex interventions (programmes), theory-based evaluations have grown in prominence in recent years. They seek to understand how and why an intervention works by uncovering its underlying mechanisms by means of programme theory. To support both outcome evaluation in paediatric palliative care and a reflective practice of programme theorizing, we aimed to describe the construction of a programme theory for a specialist paediatric palliative and hospice care programme in Austria and to offer a reflective account of its development process.

Methods: We drew on a combination of theory-based evaluation frameworks to construct a programme theory consisting of an action and a change component. Through multiple iterations, incorporating different stakeholders' perspectives and drawing on different sources of knowledge and theory, we theorized how and why the programme likely achieves its intended outcomes.

Results: The programme theory outlines the proposed chains of events, causal mechanisms and outcomes of a specialist paediatric palliative and hospice care programme for children and families in several areas corresponding to its main conceptual tenets. Through a range of activities and interventions, the programme triggers coping and adaptation mechanisms that ultimately contribute to family and child wellbeing in physical, psychological, social, and spiritual dimensions. Established trust and partnership between children/families and healthcare professionals as well as a person-centered and family-centered approach were identified as enabling factors.

Conclusions: Our findings provide insights into how a specialized paediatric palliative and hospice care programme works to achieve its intended outcomes for children and families. This helps demonstrate its impact, contributing to meaningful outcome evaluation and service improvement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建立儿科姑息治疗和临终关怀专科项目的项目理论:发展过程和方法反思。
背景:儿科姑息关怀和临终关怀旨在改善患有局限生命和危及生命疾病的儿童及其家人的生活质量。近年来,这些患者的人数大幅增加,导致对姑息关怀的需求也随之增加。尽管对儿科姑息关怀和临终关怀的需求日益增长,但作为一项复杂的医疗干预措施,对其有效性进行有意义的结果评估尚处于早期阶段。对于复杂的干预措施(计划)而言,基于理论的评估近年来日益突出。它们试图通过计划理论揭示干预措施的内在机制,从而了解干预措施如何以及为何有效。为了支持儿科姑息关怀的结果评估和项目理论化的反思实践,我们旨在描述奥地利儿科姑息关怀和临终关怀专业项目的项目理论构建,并对其发展过程进行反思:方法:我们结合了基于理论的评估框架,构建了一个由行动和变革两部分组成的计划理论。通过多次迭代,结合不同利益相关者的观点,并借鉴不同的知识和理论来源,我们对该计划可能实现其预期成果的方式和原因进行了理论分析:该计划理论概述了针对儿童和家庭的儿科姑息关怀和临终关怀专业计划的拟议事件链、因果机制和成果,这些事件链、因果机制和成果与该计划的主要概念信条相对应。通过一系列活动和干预措施,该计划触发了应对和适应机制,最终促进了家庭和儿童在生理、心理、社会和精神方面的福祉。儿童/家庭与医疗保健专业人员之间建立的信任和伙伴关系以及以人为本和以家庭为中心的方法被认为是有利因素:我们的研究结果为儿科姑息关怀和临终关怀专科项目如何为儿童和家庭实现预期成果提供了见解。这有助于证明该计划的影响,有助于进行有意义的成果评估和服务改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Palliative Care
BMC Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.70%
发文量
201
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Palliative Care is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the clinical, scientific, ethical and policy issues, local and international, regarding all aspects of hospice and palliative care for the dying and for those with profound suffering related to chronic illness.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Community-based palliative care needs and barriers to access among cancer patients in rural north India: a Participatory action research. Effects of a structured, family-supported, and patient-centred advance care planning on end-of-life decision making among palliative care patients and their family members: protocol of a randomised controlled trial. Spiritual needs of family caregivers in palliative care. Advance care planning readiness among community-dwelling older adults and the influencing factors: a scoping review. Expected benefits and concerns regarding virtual reality in caring for terminally ill cancer patients - a qualitative interview study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1