Vitamin D Supplementation in Functional Recovery of Subjects with Severe Acquired Brain Injury: A Pilot Controlled Randomized Study.

IF 1.8 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurotrauma reports Pub Date : 2024-07-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1089/neur.2023.0128
Domenico Intiso, Antonello Marco Centra, Michele Gravina, Massimiliano Copetti, Andrea Fontana, Michelangelo Bartolo, Serena Filoni, Filomena Di Rienzo
{"title":"Vitamin D Supplementation in Functional Recovery of Subjects with Severe Acquired Brain Injury: A Pilot Controlled Randomized Study.","authors":"Domenico Intiso, Antonello Marco Centra, Michele Gravina, Massimiliano Copetti, Andrea Fontana, Michelangelo Bartolo, Serena Filoni, Filomena Di Rienzo","doi":"10.1089/neur.2023.0128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Low vitamin D (VD) has been associated with poor clinical course in several neurological diseases. Supplementation has been suggested to improve outcomes. Severe acquired brain injury (sABI) subjects have low VD levels and disabling conditions requiring rehabilitation. The aim of the present study was to evaluate if VD supplementation produced a better clinical course and a better functional outcome in sABI during rehabilitation. A randomized single-blind study was performed. sABI subjects were randomized to the VD supplementation group (VDsG) (initial dose of 50.000 UI and 1.000 daily) and usual care control group (CG). Disability Rating Scale (DRS), Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), and Level of Cognitive Functioning (LCF) were used in assessing disability. A total of 73 subjects (42 M and 31 F; mean age 53.2 ± 15.7) were randomized: 36 (21 M and 15 F; mean age 57.52 ± 14.88) to VDsG and 37 (20 M and 17 F; mean age 48.28 ± 17.47) to CG. Both groups significantly improved after rehabilitation, and no between-group difference was observed. The mean score values for DRS, GOS, and LCF in VDsG were 18.83 ± 4.27 and 9.42 ± 5.83; 2.89 ± 0.32 and 3.78 ± 0.80; and 4.81 ± 1.70 and 7.53 ± 1.28, at admission and discharge, respectively. Likewise, mean values for DRS, GOS, and LCF in CG were 18.57 ± 4.80 and 9.84 ± 6.34; 2.84 ± 0.37 and 3.81 ± 0.94; and 4.97 ± 2.01 and 7.41 ± 1.32, respectively. VD supplementation did not improve functional outcomes in sABI during rehabilitation treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":74300,"journal":{"name":"Neurotrauma reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11257121/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurotrauma reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/neur.2023.0128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Low vitamin D (VD) has been associated with poor clinical course in several neurological diseases. Supplementation has been suggested to improve outcomes. Severe acquired brain injury (sABI) subjects have low VD levels and disabling conditions requiring rehabilitation. The aim of the present study was to evaluate if VD supplementation produced a better clinical course and a better functional outcome in sABI during rehabilitation. A randomized single-blind study was performed. sABI subjects were randomized to the VD supplementation group (VDsG) (initial dose of 50.000 UI and 1.000 daily) and usual care control group (CG). Disability Rating Scale (DRS), Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), and Level of Cognitive Functioning (LCF) were used in assessing disability. A total of 73 subjects (42 M and 31 F; mean age 53.2 ± 15.7) were randomized: 36 (21 M and 15 F; mean age 57.52 ± 14.88) to VDsG and 37 (20 M and 17 F; mean age 48.28 ± 17.47) to CG. Both groups significantly improved after rehabilitation, and no between-group difference was observed. The mean score values for DRS, GOS, and LCF in VDsG were 18.83 ± 4.27 and 9.42 ± 5.83; 2.89 ± 0.32 and 3.78 ± 0.80; and 4.81 ± 1.70 and 7.53 ± 1.28, at admission and discharge, respectively. Likewise, mean values for DRS, GOS, and LCF in CG were 18.57 ± 4.80 and 9.84 ± 6.34; 2.84 ± 0.37 and 3.81 ± 0.94; and 4.97 ± 2.01 and 7.41 ± 1.32, respectively. VD supplementation did not improve functional outcomes in sABI during rehabilitation treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
补充维生素 D 有助于严重后天性脑损伤患者的功能恢复:试验性随机对照研究》。
维生素 D(VD)过低与多种神经系统疾病的不良临床过程有关。有人建议补充维生素 D 以改善预后。严重后天性脑损伤(sABI)患者的维生素 D 水平较低,并伴有需要康复治疗的致残情况。本研究的目的是评估补充 VD 是否能改善后天性脑损伤患者在康复期间的临床过程和功能预后。研究人员将 sABI 受试者随机分为 VD 补充组(VDsG)(初始剂量为 50.000 UI 和每天 1.000)和常规护理对照组(CG)。残疾评定量表(DRS)、格拉斯哥结果量表(GOS)和认知功能水平(LCF)用于评估残疾情况。共有 73 名受试者(42 名男性和 31 名女性;平均年龄为 53.2 ± 15.7)被随机分配:其中 36 人(21 名男性和 15 名女性;平均年龄为 57.52 ± 14.88)接受 VDsG,37 人(20 名男性和 17 名女性;平均年龄为 48.28 ± 17.47)接受 CG。两组患者在康复治疗后均有明显改善,组间无差异。入院和出院时,VDsG 的 DRS、GOS 和 LCF 平均值分别为(18.83 ± 4.27)和(9.42 ± 5.83);(2.89 ± 0.32)和(3.78 ± 0.80);以及(4.81 ± 1.70)和(7.53 ± 1.28)。同样,CG 的 DRS、GOS 和 LCF 平均值分别为 18.57 ± 4.80 和 9.84 ± 6.34;2.84 ± 0.37 和 3.81 ± 0.94;4.97 ± 2.01 和 7.41 ± 1.32。在康复治疗期间,补充 VD 并未改善 sABI 的功能预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Symptomatic Recovery from Concussion in Military Service Members with and Without Associated Bodily Injuries. Traumatic Brain Injury and Genetic Risk for Alzheimer's Disease Impact Cerebrospinal Fluid β-Amyloid Levels in Vietnam War Veterans. Old Age Exacerbates White Matter Neuroinflammation and Cognitive Deficits Following Closed-Head Injury, Particularly in Female Mice. Ossification of Cranial Epidural Hematomas: A Systematic Review of Management Strategies and Presentation of an Illustrative Case. Acute and Reversible Hypothalamic Symptoms in a Lateral Head Impact Mouse Model of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1