How am I going? Behavioral engagement mediates the effect of individual feedback on writing performance

IF 4.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Learning and Instruction Pub Date : 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101977
Johanna Fleckenstein , Thorben Jansen , Jennifer Meyer , Ruth Trüb , Emily E. Raubach , Stefan D. Keller
{"title":"How am I going? Behavioral engagement mediates the effect of individual feedback on writing performance","authors":"Johanna Fleckenstein ,&nbsp;Thorben Jansen ,&nbsp;Jennifer Meyer ,&nbsp;Ruth Trüb ,&nbsp;Emily E. Raubach ,&nbsp;Stefan D. Keller","doi":"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Successful feedback should provide learning goals, evaluate current performance and indicate improvement strategies. Furthermore, feedback can only positively affect student performance if students actively engage with it. Thus, it is necessary to consider the feedback reception process in addition to the feedback information itself.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>This study compares the effects of different types of feedback information on the writing performance of lower secondary students of English as a foreign language (EFL) in a digital learning environment. Behavioral engagement was considered as a mediator of the feedback effect.</p></div><div><h3>Sample</h3><p>Participants were <em>N</em> = 338 eighth- and ninth-grade EFL students (54.7% female) enrolled in lower-secondary education within the Swiss school system.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a web-based randomized-controlled experiment, in which students were randomly assigned to four conditions receiving varying amounts of rubric-based feedback information. We used log data (time on feedback page) as a proxy for their behavioral engagement with the feedback.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Even though writing performance improved substantially across conditions, there were no differential effects of the type of feedback information on performance. However, EFL learners who received individual performance information spent more time with the feedback, especially those with low prior achievement. Mediation analysis showed that the effectiveness of the feedback was mediated by the time spent on the feedback as an indicator of students' behavioral engagement.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Advantages for individual performance feedback over more general information were observed as a function of time spent with the feedback. This finding implies that engagement should be considered in feedback research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48357,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Instruction","volume":"93 ","pages":"Article 101977"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095947522400104X/pdfft?md5=88177ef7e219a2c6a8ef34a560012b9b&pid=1-s2.0-S095947522400104X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095947522400104X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Successful feedback should provide learning goals, evaluate current performance and indicate improvement strategies. Furthermore, feedback can only positively affect student performance if students actively engage with it. Thus, it is necessary to consider the feedback reception process in addition to the feedback information itself.

Aims

This study compares the effects of different types of feedback information on the writing performance of lower secondary students of English as a foreign language (EFL) in a digital learning environment. Behavioral engagement was considered as a mediator of the feedback effect.

Sample

Participants were N = 338 eighth- and ninth-grade EFL students (54.7% female) enrolled in lower-secondary education within the Swiss school system.

Methods

We conducted a web-based randomized-controlled experiment, in which students were randomly assigned to four conditions receiving varying amounts of rubric-based feedback information. We used log data (time on feedback page) as a proxy for their behavioral engagement with the feedback.

Results

Even though writing performance improved substantially across conditions, there were no differential effects of the type of feedback information on performance. However, EFL learners who received individual performance information spent more time with the feedback, especially those with low prior achievement. Mediation analysis showed that the effectiveness of the feedback was mediated by the time spent on the feedback as an indicator of students' behavioral engagement.

Conclusions

Advantages for individual performance feedback over more general information were observed as a function of time spent with the feedback. This finding implies that engagement should be considered in feedback research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我写得怎么样?行为参与是个人反馈对写作成绩影响的中介
背景成功的反馈应该提供学习目标、评估当前成绩并指出改进策略。此外,只有当学生积极参与反馈时,反馈才能对学生的成绩产生积极影响。本研究比较了不同类型的反馈信息在数字化学习环境中对初中英语作为外语(EFL)学生写作成绩的影响。方法我们进行了一项基于网络的随机对照实验,将学生随机分配到四个条件下,接受不同数量的基于评分标准的反馈信息。我们使用日志数据(在反馈页面上停留的时间)作为学生参与反馈行为的代表。结果尽管不同条件下的写作成绩都有大幅提高,但反馈信息的类型对成绩并无不同影响。然而,获得个人成绩信息的 EFL 学习者花在反馈上的时间更多,尤其是那些先前成绩较低的学习者。中介分析表明,作为学生行为参与度的指标,反馈所花费的时间对反馈的有效性有中介作用。这一发现意味着在反馈研究中应考虑参与度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: As an international, multi-disciplinary, peer-refereed journal, Learning and Instruction provides a platform for the publication of the most advanced scientific research in the areas of learning, development, instruction and teaching. The journal welcomes original empirical investigations. The papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and different methodological approaches. They may refer to any age level, from infants to adults and to a diversity of learning and instructional settings, from laboratory experiments to field studies. The major criteria in the review and the selection process concern the significance of the contribution to the area of learning and instruction, and the rigor of the study.
期刊最新文献
Competitive and non-competitive school climate and students’ well-being Comparison effects on self- and external ratings: Testing the generalizability of the 2I/E model to parents and teachers of academic track school students Testing the CONIC model: The interplay of conscientiousness and interest in predicting academic effort Metacognitive scaffolding for digital reading and mind-wandering in adults with and without ADHD Retrieval supports word learning in children with Down syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1