Optimal Management Strategy for Salt Adsorption Capacity in Machine Learning-Based Flow-Electrode Capacitive Deionization Process

IF 7.4 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL ACS ES&T engineering Pub Date : 2024-07-17 DOI:10.1021/acsestengg.4c00142
Sung Il Yu, Junbeom Jeon, Yong-Uk Shin, Hyokwan Bae
{"title":"Optimal Management Strategy for Salt Adsorption Capacity in Machine Learning-Based Flow-Electrode Capacitive Deionization Process","authors":"Sung Il Yu, Junbeom Jeon, Yong-Uk Shin, Hyokwan Bae","doi":"10.1021/acsestengg.4c00142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Flow-electrode capacitive deionization (FCDI) has created a breakthrough toward a more stable desalination performance by adopting a flow-electrode compared to existing capacitive deionization and membrane capacitive deionization as a promising electrochemical water treatment technology. However, the FCDI technology requires investigation of various mechanisms pertaining to flow-electrode materials to achieve system optimization. Further, studies on applying machine learning to the FCDI technology have been scarcely reported. Our study aims to explore optimal algorithms via machine learning for predicting the salt adsorption capacity of FCDI processes and evaluate the feasibility of optimization applications. Concurrently, a comparative analysis was conducted through the performance model indicators of mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error, and <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> for support vector machine, random forest, and artificial neural network (ANN) algorithms. Herein, we demonstrated that the optimal ANN-based model exhibited the highest predictive performance, achieving <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> and MAE values of 0.996 and 0.21 mg/g, respectively. Additionally, the Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) confirmed a trend in the contribution of influent concentration, aligning closely with the results of statistical analysis. Specifically, the change in voltage of the FCDI process serves as a key factor in determining salt adsorption efficiency. Moreover, a parallel comparison of the Pearson correlation coefficient and SHAP analyses suggests that the impact of voltage entails a nonlinear contribution within the realm of machine learning. Finally, to deploy a machine learning-driven ANN model system, we present multiple factors (e.g., weight of flow-electrodes, influent concentration, and voltages) as a reinforcement learning model for decision-making. This offers valuable insights and guidance for future operations of the FCDI process.","PeriodicalId":7008,"journal":{"name":"ACS ES&T engineering","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS ES&T engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestengg.4c00142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Flow-electrode capacitive deionization (FCDI) has created a breakthrough toward a more stable desalination performance by adopting a flow-electrode compared to existing capacitive deionization and membrane capacitive deionization as a promising electrochemical water treatment technology. However, the FCDI technology requires investigation of various mechanisms pertaining to flow-electrode materials to achieve system optimization. Further, studies on applying machine learning to the FCDI technology have been scarcely reported. Our study aims to explore optimal algorithms via machine learning for predicting the salt adsorption capacity of FCDI processes and evaluate the feasibility of optimization applications. Concurrently, a comparative analysis was conducted through the performance model indicators of mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error, and R2 for support vector machine, random forest, and artificial neural network (ANN) algorithms. Herein, we demonstrated that the optimal ANN-based model exhibited the highest predictive performance, achieving R2 and MAE values of 0.996 and 0.21 mg/g, respectively. Additionally, the Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) confirmed a trend in the contribution of influent concentration, aligning closely with the results of statistical analysis. Specifically, the change in voltage of the FCDI process serves as a key factor in determining salt adsorption efficiency. Moreover, a parallel comparison of the Pearson correlation coefficient and SHAP analyses suggests that the impact of voltage entails a nonlinear contribution within the realm of machine learning. Finally, to deploy a machine learning-driven ANN model system, we present multiple factors (e.g., weight of flow-electrodes, influent concentration, and voltages) as a reinforcement learning model for decision-making. This offers valuable insights and guidance for future operations of the FCDI process.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于机器学习的流电极电容式去离子工艺中盐吸附容量的优化管理策略
与现有的电容式去离子法和膜电容去离子法相比,流动电极电容式去离子法(FCDI)通过采用流动电极,在实现更稳定的海水淡化性能方面取得了突破性进展,是一种前景广阔的电化学水处理技术。然而,FCDI 技术需要研究与流动电极材料有关的各种机制,以实现系统优化。此外,将机器学习应用于 FCDI 技术的研究也鲜有报道。我们的研究旨在通过机器学习探索预测 FCDI 过程盐吸附能力的最佳算法,并评估优化应用的可行性。同时,通过支持向量机、随机森林和人工神经网络(ANN)算法的平均绝对误差(MAE)、平均平方误差和 R2 等性能模型指标进行了比较分析。结果表明,基于人工神经网络的最优化模型具有最高的预测性能,其 R2 和 MAE 值分别为 0.996 和 0.21 mg/g。此外,夏普利加法解释(SHAP)证实了进水浓度的贡献趋势,与统计分析结果密切吻合。具体而言,FCDI 过程的电压变化是决定盐吸附效率的关键因素。此外,对皮尔逊相关系数和 SHAP 分析的平行比较表明,电压的影响在机器学习领域内具有非线性贡献。最后,为了部署机器学习驱动的 ANN 模型系统,我们将多个因素(如流电极重量、进水浓度和电压)作为强化学习模型进行决策。这为 FCDI 流程的未来运行提供了宝贵的见解和指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS ES&T engineering
ACS ES&T engineering ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL-
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: ACS ES&T Engineering publishes impactful research and review articles across all realms of environmental technology and engineering, employing a rigorous peer-review process. As a specialized journal, it aims to provide an international platform for research and innovation, inviting contributions on materials technologies, processes, data analytics, and engineering systems that can effectively manage, protect, and remediate air, water, and soil quality, as well as treat wastes and recover resources. The journal encourages research that supports informed decision-making within complex engineered systems and is grounded in mechanistic science and analytics, describing intricate environmental engineering systems. It considers papers presenting novel advancements, spanning from laboratory discovery to field-based application. However, case or demonstration studies lacking significant scientific advancements and technological innovations are not within its scope. Contributions containing experimental and/or theoretical methods, rooted in engineering principles and integrated with knowledge from other disciplines, are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Issue Editorial Masthead Issue Publication Information Recognizing Excellence in Environmental Engineering Research: The 2023 ACS ES&T Engineering’s Best Paper Awards Review of Current and Future Indoor Air Purifying Technologies The Removal and Recovery of Non-orthophosphate from Wastewater: Current Practices and Future Directions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1