A Lower Bound Estimate of the Bearing Capacity of Foundations on Inherently Anisotropic Sands: Verification with 100 Case Studies

IF 1.7 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering Pub Date : 2024-07-20 DOI:10.1007/s40996-024-01530-6
Mohammad Ali Shokoohi, Mehdi Veiskarami, Mojtaba Jahanandish
{"title":"A Lower Bound Estimate of the Bearing Capacity of Foundations on Inherently Anisotropic Sands: Verification with 100 Case Studies","authors":"Mohammad Ali Shokoohi, Mehdi Veiskarami, Mojtaba Jahanandish","doi":"10.1007/s40996-024-01530-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Bearing capacity of transversely isotropic soils have been studied by implementing the microstructure tensor in the previous works. This paper is a counterpart of the previous theoretical one which mainly focused on the verification and physical interpretation of the results. While the previous work mainly explained the theoretical framework with some numerical verifications, this paper contains a verification made by applying the results to a number of collected database of footing load tests both in the field and in the lab. The main idea is that the natural sedimentation process makes most soils some degree of anisotropy. This anisotropy is often neglected while geotechnical studies are conducted and when the bearing capacity is calculated. In this study, a comparison with theory and experimental results tries to explore the true degree of anisotropy in natural granular soil deposits, at least for practical purposes. Results indicate that if the anisotropy is ignored, the theoretical estimate of the bearing capacity is nearly 20% to 30% higher than the actual values measured in practice. Of course the nature of the test and the interpretation of the test data are influential on this general conclusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":14550,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-024-01530-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bearing capacity of transversely isotropic soils have been studied by implementing the microstructure tensor in the previous works. This paper is a counterpart of the previous theoretical one which mainly focused on the verification and physical interpretation of the results. While the previous work mainly explained the theoretical framework with some numerical verifications, this paper contains a verification made by applying the results to a number of collected database of footing load tests both in the field and in the lab. The main idea is that the natural sedimentation process makes most soils some degree of anisotropy. This anisotropy is often neglected while geotechnical studies are conducted and when the bearing capacity is calculated. In this study, a comparison with theory and experimental results tries to explore the true degree of anisotropy in natural granular soil deposits, at least for practical purposes. Results indicate that if the anisotropy is ignored, the theoretical estimate of the bearing capacity is nearly 20% to 30% higher than the actual values measured in practice. Of course the nature of the test and the interpretation of the test data are influential on this general conclusion.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
各向异性固有砂地基承载力下限估算:通过 100 个案例研究进行验证
在以往的研究中,通过采用微结构张量对横向各向同性土的承载力进行了研究。本文是对前人理论研究的补充,主要侧重于结果的验证和物理解释。前人的工作主要是通过一些数值验证来解释理论框架,而本文则是通过将结果应用于在现场和实验室收集的大量基脚荷载试验数据库来进行验证。主要观点是,自然沉积过程使大多数土壤具有一定程度的各向异性。在进行岩土工程研究和计算承载力时,这种各向异性往往被忽视。在本研究中,通过理论与实验结果的对比,试图探索天然颗粒土沉积中各向异性的真实程度,至少在实际应用中是这样。结果表明,如果忽略各向异性,承载力的理论估算值要比实际测量值高出近 20% 至 30%。当然,试验的性质和对试验数据的解释会对这一总体结论产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
11.80%
发文量
203
期刊介绍: The aim of the Iranian Journal of Science and Technology is to foster the growth of scientific research among Iranian engineers and scientists and to provide a medium by means of which the fruits of these researches may be brought to the attention of the world’s civil Engineering communities. This transaction focuses on all aspects of Civil Engineering and will accept the original research contributions (previously unpublished) from all areas of established engineering disciplines. The papers may be theoretical, experimental or both. The journal publishes original papers within the broad field of civil engineering which include, but are not limited to, the following: -Structural engineering- Earthquake engineering- Concrete engineering- Construction management- Steel structures- Engineering mechanics- Water resources engineering- Hydraulic engineering- Hydraulic structures- Environmental engineering- Soil mechanics- Foundation engineering- Geotechnical engineering- Transportation engineering- Surveying and geomatics.
期刊最新文献
Coupled Rainfall-Runoff and Hydrodynamic Modeling using MIKE + for Flood Simulation Mechanical and Microstructural Characteristics of Fly Ash-Nano-Silica Composites Enhancement of the Mechanical Characteristics of a Green Mortar Under Extreme Conditions: Experimental Study and Optimization Analysis A Case Study on the Effect of Multiple Earthquakes on Mid-rise RC Buildings with Mass and Stiffness Irregularity in Height Incremental Plastic Analysis of Confined Concrete Considering the Variation of Elastic Moduli
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1