Money and values in couples: a cross-welfare system comparison of gender values

Olga Jimenez-Rodriguez, Felix Requena
{"title":"Money and values in couples: a cross-welfare system comparison of gender values","authors":"Olga Jimenez-Rodriguez, Felix Requena","doi":"10.1108/ijssp-04-2024-0187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Money management practices among couples from 27 countries were studied to understand how they reflect egalitarian values. The welfare system was used as a classification criterion, to account for the distinct socio-political contexts in which couple relationships are formed.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The data are sourced from the 2012 Survey on Family and Changing Gender Roles of the International Social Survey Programme. The analytical strategy used has been binary logistic regression.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The results demonstrate that participation of the woman in the household economy and financial decision-making indicates higher levels of egalitarian values in the couple. Couples who distinguish between a common fund and individual funds demonstrate more egalitarian values than those who have only a common fund. Besides, symmetry in the couple in terms of the income level of each partner increased the probability of having more egalitarian values. Greater equality was found among couples who resided in countries with a Mediterranean welfare system.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The paper makes an original contribution to the field of sociology and social policy by focus on couples' money management and improve understanding of the finance-well-being nexus.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47193,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy","volume":"337 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijssp-04-2024-0187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Money management practices among couples from 27 countries were studied to understand how they reflect egalitarian values. The welfare system was used as a classification criterion, to account for the distinct socio-political contexts in which couple relationships are formed.

Design/methodology/approach

The data are sourced from the 2012 Survey on Family and Changing Gender Roles of the International Social Survey Programme. The analytical strategy used has been binary logistic regression.

Findings

The results demonstrate that participation of the woman in the household economy and financial decision-making indicates higher levels of egalitarian values in the couple. Couples who distinguish between a common fund and individual funds demonstrate more egalitarian values than those who have only a common fund. Besides, symmetry in the couple in terms of the income level of each partner increased the probability of having more egalitarian values. Greater equality was found among couples who resided in countries with a Mediterranean welfare system.

Originality/value

The paper makes an original contribution to the field of sociology and social policy by focus on couples' money management and improve understanding of the finance-well-being nexus.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
夫妻间的金钱观和价值观:跨福利制度的性别价值观比较
目的 研究了 27 个国家的夫妇的理财实践,以了解他们如何反映平等主义价值观。研究采用福利制度作为分类标准,以考虑到夫妻关系形成的不同社会政治背景。结果结果表明,女性参与家庭经济和财务决策表明夫妻双方的平等主义价值观水平较高。区分共同基金和个人基金的夫妇比只有共同基金的夫妇表现出更多的平等主义价值观。此外,夫妻双方收入水平的对称性也增加了拥有更多平等主义价值观的可能性。在居住在地中海福利体系国家的夫妇中,平等程度更高。 原创性/价值 本文通过关注夫妇的资金管理,加深了人们对资金-福利关系的理解,为社会学和社会政策领域做出了原创性贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
59
期刊最新文献
“What do you mean by that?”: solidarity in Canadian development practice Conquerors of poverty – a case study of Colombo slum dwellers Hybrid religious civil society organization, the Israeli case of “the path upwards” lesson learned Relational freedom and the Ilan Pappe case: an anthropological proposal for freedom Give me credit! Microcredit for sustainable development and ethical finance in Rione Sanità, Naples
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1