Evaluation and comparison of infiltration models for estimating infiltration capacity of different textures of irrigated soils

Halefom Mesele, Berhane Grum, Gebremeskel Aregay, Gebremeskel Teklay Berhe
{"title":"Evaluation and comparison of infiltration models for estimating infiltration capacity of different textures of irrigated soils","authors":"Halefom Mesele, Berhane Grum, Gebremeskel Aregay, Gebremeskel Teklay Berhe","doi":"10.1186/s40068-024-00356-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurate estimation of infiltration rates is crucial for effective irrigation system design and evaluation by optimizing irrigation scheduling, preventing soil erosion, and enhancing water use efficiency. This study evaluates and compares selected infiltration models for estimating water infiltration rates in the Shillanat-iv irrigation scheme in northern Ethiopia. Soil samples were collected to determine textural classes using hydrometer soil texture analysis and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) textural triangle. The soil textural map of the study was created using the inverse distance weight interpolation technique in ArcGIS version 10.4. Infiltration rates were measured using the double-ring infiltrometer for five soil textures: clay loam, loam, sandy clay loam, clay, and sandy loam. Six infiltration models (Kostiakov, Modified Kostiakov, Revised Modified Kostiakov, Philip, Horton, and Novel) were employed and evaluated using statistical parameters. Model calibration and validation were conducted using data from 38 points within the study area. The parameter values of the infiltration models were optimized using SPSS statistical software using least-squares errors. The results showed that, Revised Modified Kostiakov, Modified Kostiakov, and Novel infiltration models demonstrated superior capability in estimating infiltration rates for clay loam, loam, and sandy loam soil textures, respectively. Horton's model outperformed other models in estimating infiltration rates for both sandy clay loam and clay soil textures. The appropriately fitted infiltration models can be utilized in designing the irrigation system to estimate the infiltration rate of soil textures within the selected irrigation scheme and at similar sites with comparable soil textures.","PeriodicalId":12037,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Systems Research","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Systems Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40068-024-00356-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate estimation of infiltration rates is crucial for effective irrigation system design and evaluation by optimizing irrigation scheduling, preventing soil erosion, and enhancing water use efficiency. This study evaluates and compares selected infiltration models for estimating water infiltration rates in the Shillanat-iv irrigation scheme in northern Ethiopia. Soil samples were collected to determine textural classes using hydrometer soil texture analysis and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) textural triangle. The soil textural map of the study was created using the inverse distance weight interpolation technique in ArcGIS version 10.4. Infiltration rates were measured using the double-ring infiltrometer for five soil textures: clay loam, loam, sandy clay loam, clay, and sandy loam. Six infiltration models (Kostiakov, Modified Kostiakov, Revised Modified Kostiakov, Philip, Horton, and Novel) were employed and evaluated using statistical parameters. Model calibration and validation were conducted using data from 38 points within the study area. The parameter values of the infiltration models were optimized using SPSS statistical software using least-squares errors. The results showed that, Revised Modified Kostiakov, Modified Kostiakov, and Novel infiltration models demonstrated superior capability in estimating infiltration rates for clay loam, loam, and sandy loam soil textures, respectively. Horton's model outperformed other models in estimating infiltration rates for both sandy clay loam and clay soil textures. The appropriately fitted infiltration models can be utilized in designing the irrigation system to estimate the infiltration rate of soil textures within the selected irrigation scheme and at similar sites with comparable soil textures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估和比较用于估算不同质地灌溉土壤入渗能力的入渗模型
通过优化灌溉调度、防止土壤侵蚀和提高用水效率,准确估算入渗率对于有效的灌溉系统设计和评估至关重要。本研究对埃塞俄比亚北部 Shillanat-iv 灌溉计划中用于估算水渗透率的选定渗透模型进行了评估和比较。收集了土壤样本,使用比重计土壤质地分析法和美国农业部(USDA)质地三角测量法确定质地等级。这项研究的土壤质地图是使用 ArcGIS 10.4 版中的反距离加权插值技术绘制的。使用双环渗透仪测量了粘壤土、壤土、砂质粘壤土、粘土和砂质壤土五种土壤质地的渗透率。采用了六种渗透模型(Kostiakov、修正 Kostiakov、修正 Kostiakov、Philip、Horton 和 Novel),并使用统计参数进行了评估。利用研究区域内 38 个点的数据对模型进行了校准和验证。使用 SPSS 统计软件,利用最小二乘误差对渗透模型的参数值进行了优化。结果表明,修订的修正科斯蒂亚科夫模型、修正的科斯蒂亚科夫模型和新型入渗模型在估算粘壤土、壤土和砂壤土土壤质地的入渗率方面分别表现出卓越的能力。霍顿模型在估算砂质粘壤土和粘土质地的入渗率方面优于其他模型。在设计灌溉系统时,可利用适当拟合的入渗模型来估算所选灌溉方案中土壤质地的入渗率,以及土壤质地相似的类似地点的入渗率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of land cover degradation due to mining activities using remote sensing and digital photogrammetry A comprehensive review on challenges and choices of food waste in Saudi Arabia: exploring environmental and economic impacts Performance evaluation of integrated Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket reactor with trickling filter used for municipal wastewater treatment and effluent reuse potential for agriculture Machine learning downscaling of GRACE/GRACE-FO data to capture spatial-temporal drought effects on groundwater storage at a local scale under data-scarcity Downstream impacts of dam breach using HEC-RAS: a case of Budhigandaki concrete arch dam in central Nepal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1