Construction and Hedging of Equity Index Options Portfolios

Maciej Wysocki, Robert Ślepaczuk
{"title":"Construction and Hedging of Equity Index Options Portfolios","authors":"Maciej Wysocki, Robert Ślepaczuk","doi":"arxiv-2407.13908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research presents a comprehensive evaluation of systematic index\noption-writing strategies, focusing on S&P500 index options. We compare the\nperformance of hedging strategies using the Black-Scholes-Merton (BSM) model\nand the Variance-Gamma (VG) model, emphasizing varying moneyness levels and\ndifferent sizing methods based on delta and the VIX Index. The study employs\n1-minute data of S&P500 index options and index quotes spanning from 2018 to\n2023. The analysis benchmarks hedged strategies against buy-and-hold and naked\noption-writing strategies, with a focus on risk-adjusted performance metrics\nincluding transaction costs. Portfolio delta approximations are derived using\nimplied volatility for the BSM model and market-calibrated parameters for the\nVG model. Key findings reveal that systematic option-writing strategies can\npotentially yield superior returns compared to buy-and-hold benchmarks. The BSM\nmodel generally provided better hedging outcomes than the VG model, although\nthe VG model showed profitability in certain naked strategies as a tool for\nposition sizing. In terms of rehedging frequency, we found that intraday\nhedging in 130-minute intervals provided both reliable protection against\nadverse market movements and a satisfactory returns profile.","PeriodicalId":501478,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuantFin - Trading and Market Microstructure","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuantFin - Trading and Market Microstructure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.13908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research presents a comprehensive evaluation of systematic index option-writing strategies, focusing on S&P500 index options. We compare the performance of hedging strategies using the Black-Scholes-Merton (BSM) model and the Variance-Gamma (VG) model, emphasizing varying moneyness levels and different sizing methods based on delta and the VIX Index. The study employs 1-minute data of S&P500 index options and index quotes spanning from 2018 to 2023. The analysis benchmarks hedged strategies against buy-and-hold and naked option-writing strategies, with a focus on risk-adjusted performance metrics including transaction costs. Portfolio delta approximations are derived using implied volatility for the BSM model and market-calibrated parameters for the VG model. Key findings reveal that systematic option-writing strategies can potentially yield superior returns compared to buy-and-hold benchmarks. The BSM model generally provided better hedging outcomes than the VG model, although the VG model showed profitability in certain naked strategies as a tool for position sizing. In terms of rehedging frequency, we found that intraday hedging in 130-minute intervals provided both reliable protection against adverse market movements and a satisfactory returns profile.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
股票指数期权组合的构建与对冲
本研究以 S&P500 指数期权为重点,全面评估了系统性指数期权撰写策略。我们比较了使用布莱克-斯科尔斯-默顿(BSM)模型和方差-伽马(VG)模型的对冲策略的表现,强调了不同的货币性水平和基于 delta 和 VIX 指数的不同规模方法。研究采用了 S&P500 指数期权和指数报价的 1 分钟数据,时间跨度为 2018 年至 2023 年。分析将对冲策略与买入并持有策略和裸期权写入策略进行基准比较,重点关注包括交易成本在内的风险调整后绩效指标。在 BSM 模型中,投资组合 delta 近似值是使用预测波动率得出的,在 VG 模型中,投资组合 delta 近似值是使用市场校准参数得出的。主要研究结果表明,与买入并持有基准相比,系统性期权写作策略有可能产生更高的收益。BSM 模型的对冲效果普遍优于 VG 模型,尽管 VG 模型在某些裸策略中作为头寸大小的工具显示出了盈利能力。在重新套期保值频率方面,我们发现以 130 分钟为间隔的日内套期保值既能可靠地抵御市场的不利波动,又能提供令人满意的回报。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimal position-building strategies in Competition MarS: a Financial Market Simulation Engine Powered by Generative Foundation Model Logarithmic regret in the ergodic Avellaneda-Stoikov market making model A Financial Time Series Denoiser Based on Diffusion Model Simulation of Social Media-Driven Bubble Formation in Financial Markets using an Agent-Based Model with Hierarchical Influence Network
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1