Advances in sickle cell retinopathy screening techniques, tests, and practices: A systematic review

IF 10.1 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY American Journal of Hematology Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI:10.1002/ajh.27439
Olivia W. Cummings, Sara Rahman, Lauren Fletcher, Adrienne W. Scott
{"title":"Advances in sickle cell retinopathy screening techniques, tests, and practices: A systematic review","authors":"Olivia W. Cummings,&nbsp;Sara Rahman,&nbsp;Lauren Fletcher,&nbsp;Adrienne W. Scott","doi":"10.1002/ajh.27439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sickle cell retinopathy (SCR) is a progressive, sight-threatening ophthalmic complication of sickle cell disease (SCD). Current SCR screening focuses on the detection of pathologic sea fan neovascularization, the first sign of proliferative sickle cell retinopathy (PSR). If untreated, PSR can lead to severe visual impairment and blindness through progression to vitreous hemorrhage and/or retinal detachment. SCR screening with dilated fundus examination (DFE) is recommended every 1–2 years starting at age 10, but data underlying this recommendation are of poor quality and based upon expert consensus. We performed a systematic review to characterize imaging techniques, laboratory-based tests, and clinical practices for SCR screening. This PROSPERO-registered systematic review included relevant texts identified through predetermined searches in online databases. Collected test accuracy data facilitated the calculation of likelihood ratios. Forty-four studies evaluating 4928 patients were included. DFE demonstrated moderate test accuracy (LR+ of 8.0, LR- of 0.3). Ultra-widefield-fundus photography demonstrated superior accuracy (LR+ 32.5, LR- 0.03). Optical coherence tomography angiography applications were highly accurate for PSR identification (machine learning LR+ 32.5, LR- 0.03; human grader LR+ 2.8–213.1, LR- 0.1-0.2). Most techniques and tests were more accurate at detecting PSR than staging SCR or detecting lower-grade SCR. Our findings support the integration of advanced image-based approaches, such as computer-based image analysis and ultra-wide-field fundus imaging, for SCR screening in SCD patients given the superior accuracy in PSR detection compared with the current standard of care. Rigorous SCR screening implementation studies are needed to support evidence-based SCR screening recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":7724,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hematology","volume":"99 11","pages":"2152-2163"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajh.27439","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sickle cell retinopathy (SCR) is a progressive, sight-threatening ophthalmic complication of sickle cell disease (SCD). Current SCR screening focuses on the detection of pathologic sea fan neovascularization, the first sign of proliferative sickle cell retinopathy (PSR). If untreated, PSR can lead to severe visual impairment and blindness through progression to vitreous hemorrhage and/or retinal detachment. SCR screening with dilated fundus examination (DFE) is recommended every 1–2 years starting at age 10, but data underlying this recommendation are of poor quality and based upon expert consensus. We performed a systematic review to characterize imaging techniques, laboratory-based tests, and clinical practices for SCR screening. This PROSPERO-registered systematic review included relevant texts identified through predetermined searches in online databases. Collected test accuracy data facilitated the calculation of likelihood ratios. Forty-four studies evaluating 4928 patients were included. DFE demonstrated moderate test accuracy (LR+ of 8.0, LR- of 0.3). Ultra-widefield-fundus photography demonstrated superior accuracy (LR+ 32.5, LR- 0.03). Optical coherence tomography angiography applications were highly accurate for PSR identification (machine learning LR+ 32.5, LR- 0.03; human grader LR+ 2.8–213.1, LR- 0.1-0.2). Most techniques and tests were more accurate at detecting PSR than staging SCR or detecting lower-grade SCR. Our findings support the integration of advanced image-based approaches, such as computer-based image analysis and ultra-wide-field fundus imaging, for SCR screening in SCD patients given the superior accuracy in PSR detection compared with the current standard of care. Rigorous SCR screening implementation studies are needed to support evidence-based SCR screening recommendations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
镰状细胞视网膜病变筛查技术、测试和实践的进展:系统综述。
镰状细胞视网膜病变(SCR)是镰状细胞病(SCD)的一种渐进性、危及视力的眼科并发症。目前的镰状细胞视网膜病变筛查主要是检测病理性海扇状新生血管,这是增殖性镰状细胞视网膜病变(PSR)的第一个征兆。如果不及时治疗,增殖性镰状细胞视网膜病变会发展为玻璃体出血和/或视网膜脱离,从而导致严重的视力损伤和失明。建议从 10 岁开始每隔 1-2 年通过散瞳眼底检查(DFE)进行 SCR 筛查,但该建议所依据的数据质量不高,而且是基于专家共识。我们对 SCR 筛查的成像技术、实验室测试和临床实践进行了系统回顾。这项已在 PROSPERO 注册的系统性综述包括了通过在线数据库的预定搜索而确定的相关文本。收集的检验准确性数据有助于计算似然比。共纳入了 44 项研究,对 4928 名患者进行了评估。DFE显示了中等程度的测试准确性(LR+为8.0,LR-为0.3)。超宽场-丰度摄影显示出更高的准确性(LR+ 32.5,LR- 0.03)。光学相干断层血管造影应用在 PSR 识别方面的准确率很高(机器学习 LR+ 32.5,LR- 0.03;人工分级 LR+ 2.8-213.1,LR- 0.1-0.2)。与分期 SCR 或检测低级别 SCR 相比,大多数技术和测试在检测 PSR 方面更为准确。我们的研究结果支持将先进的基于图像的方法(如基于计算机的图像分析和超宽视野眼底成像)整合到 SCD 患者的 SCR 筛查中,因为 PSR 检测的准确性优于当前的护理标准。需要开展严格的 SCR 筛查实施研究,以支持循证 SCR 筛查建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
3.90%
发文量
363
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Hematology offers extensive coverage of experimental and clinical aspects of blood diseases in humans and animal models. The journal publishes original contributions in both non-malignant and malignant hematological diseases, encompassing clinical and basic studies in areas such as hemostasis, thrombosis, immunology, blood banking, and stem cell biology. Clinical translational reports highlighting innovative therapeutic approaches for the diagnosis and treatment of hematological diseases are actively encouraged.The American Journal of Hematology features regular original laboratory and clinical research articles, brief research reports, critical reviews, images in hematology, as well as letters and correspondence.
期刊最新文献
Acute Leukemias of Ambiguous Lineage With MDS-Associated Mutations Show Similar Prognosis Compared to Acute Myeloid Leukemia With MDS-Associated Mutations: A Study From the Bone Marrow Pathology Group Venetoclax and Hypomethylating Agent in Previously Untreated Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Genotype Signatures for Response and Prognosis: A Real-World Study Basophilia Predicts Poorer Outcomes in Essential Thrombocythemia, Polycythemia Vera, Primary Myelofibrosis, and Myeloproliferative Neoplasm, Unclassifiable Effect of voxelotor on cerebral perfusion and cerebral oxygen metabolism and cardiac stress in adult patients with sickle cell disease. Blood Plasma Methylated DNA Markers in the Detection of Lymphoma: Discovery, Validation, and Clinical Pilot.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1