[Predictive value of preoperative pelvic floor electrophysiological parameters on early urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy].

Q3 Medicine 北京大学学报(医学版) Pub Date : 2024-08-18
Shuhui Yu, Jianing Han, Lijun Zhong, Congyu Chen, Yunxiang Xiao, Yanbo Huang, Yang Yang, Xinyan Che
{"title":"[Predictive value of preoperative pelvic floor electrophysiological parameters on early urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy].","authors":"Shuhui Yu, Jianing Han, Lijun Zhong, Congyu Chen, Yunxiang Xiao, Yanbo Huang, Yang Yang, Xinyan Che","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the predictive value of preoperative pelvic floor electromyography (EMG) parameters for the risk of urinary incontinence after prostate cancer surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 271 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy in the urology department of Peking University First Hospital from January 2020 to October 2022. The data included patient age, body mass index (BMI), international prostate symptom score (IPSS), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, Gleason score, type of surgery, urethral reconstruction, lymph node dissection, nerve preservation, catheterization duration, D ' Amico risk classification, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, Charlson comorbidity index, postoperative duration, prostate volume, and pelvic floor EMG parameters (pre-resting mean, fast muscle mean, and slow muscle mean scores). Independent risk factors affecting early postoperative urinary incontinence were identified through multivariate Logistic regression analysis. The predictive efficacy of pelvic floor EMG results was evaluated by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and the optimal threshold for early postoperative urinary incontinence was determined based on the Youden index and clinical significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 271 prostate cancer patients, with an 81.9% rate of voluntary urinary control post-surgery. The median score for fast pelvic floor muscles was 23.5(18.2, 31.6), and for slow muscles, it was 12.5(9.6, 17.3). Among the patients, 179 (66.1%) did not preserve nerves, and 110 (40.6%) underwent urethral reconstruction. Advanced age and low fast muscle scores were identified as independent risk factors for urinary incontinence. Patients aged ≤60 had 5.482 times the voluntary urinary control rate compared with those aged ≥70 (95%<i>CI</i>: 1.532-19.617, <i>P</i> < 0.05). There was a significant correlation between fast muscle scores and urinary incontinence recovery (<i>OR</i>=1.209, 95%<i>CI</i>: 1.132-1.291, <i>P</i> < 0.05). When the optimal threshold for preoperative fast muscle score was set at 18.5, the ROC sensitivity and specificity were 80.6% and 61.2%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preoperative pelvic floor EMG parameters show good predictive accuracy and clinical applicability for the risk of urinary incontinence after prostate cancer surgery. These parameters can be used for early identification of urinary incontinence risk, with age and fast muscle scores being important predictors.</p>","PeriodicalId":8790,"journal":{"name":"北京大学学报(医学版)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11284456/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"北京大学学报(医学版)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the predictive value of preoperative pelvic floor electromyography (EMG) parameters for the risk of urinary incontinence after prostate cancer surgery.

Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 271 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy in the urology department of Peking University First Hospital from January 2020 to October 2022. The data included patient age, body mass index (BMI), international prostate symptom score (IPSS), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, Gleason score, type of surgery, urethral reconstruction, lymph node dissection, nerve preservation, catheterization duration, D ' Amico risk classification, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, Charlson comorbidity index, postoperative duration, prostate volume, and pelvic floor EMG parameters (pre-resting mean, fast muscle mean, and slow muscle mean scores). Independent risk factors affecting early postoperative urinary incontinence were identified through multivariate Logistic regression analysis. The predictive efficacy of pelvic floor EMG results was evaluated by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and the optimal threshold for early postoperative urinary incontinence was determined based on the Youden index and clinical significance.

Results: The study included 271 prostate cancer patients, with an 81.9% rate of voluntary urinary control post-surgery. The median score for fast pelvic floor muscles was 23.5(18.2, 31.6), and for slow muscles, it was 12.5(9.6, 17.3). Among the patients, 179 (66.1%) did not preserve nerves, and 110 (40.6%) underwent urethral reconstruction. Advanced age and low fast muscle scores were identified as independent risk factors for urinary incontinence. Patients aged ≤60 had 5.482 times the voluntary urinary control rate compared with those aged ≥70 (95%CI: 1.532-19.617, P < 0.05). There was a significant correlation between fast muscle scores and urinary incontinence recovery (OR=1.209, 95%CI: 1.132-1.291, P < 0.05). When the optimal threshold for preoperative fast muscle score was set at 18.5, the ROC sensitivity and specificity were 80.6% and 61.2%, respectively.

Conclusion: Preoperative pelvic floor EMG parameters show good predictive accuracy and clinical applicability for the risk of urinary incontinence after prostate cancer surgery. These parameters can be used for early identification of urinary incontinence risk, with age and fast muscle scores being important predictors.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[术前盆底电生理参数对根治性前列腺切除术后早期尿失禁的预测价值]。
目的:探讨盆底肌电图参数对前列腺癌术后尿失禁风险的预测价值:探讨术前盆底肌电图(EMG)参数对前列腺癌术后尿失禁风险的预测价值:本研究回顾性分析了 2020 年 1 月至 2022 年 10 月期间在北京大学第一医院泌尿外科接受前列腺癌根治术的 271 例患者的病历。数据包括患者年龄、体重指数(BMI)、国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平、格里森评分、手术类型、尿道重建、淋巴结清扫、神经保留、导尿时间、D' Amico 风险分类、美国麻醉医师协会 (ASA) 评分、Charlson 合并症指数、术后持续时间、前列腺体积和盆底肌电图参数(静息前平均值、快肌平均值和慢肌平均值)。通过多变量 Logistic 回归分析,确定了影响术后早期尿失禁的独立风险因素。通过计算接收者操作特征曲线下面积(ROC)评估盆底肌电图结果的预测效果,并根据尤登指数和临床意义确定术后早期尿失禁的最佳阈值:研究共纳入 271 名前列腺癌患者,术后自主控尿率为 81.9%。盆底快速肌中位数为 23.5(18.2, 31.6)分,慢速肌中位数为 12.5(9.6, 17.3)分。患者中有 179 人(66.1%)未保留神经,110 人(40.6%)接受了尿道重建术。高龄和快速肌肉评分低被认为是尿失禁的独立风险因素。与年龄≥70岁的患者相比,年龄≤60岁患者的自主控尿率是后者的5.482倍(95%CI:1.532-19.617,P<0.05)。快肌评分与尿失禁恢复之间存在明显的相关性(OR=1.209,95%CI:1.132-1.291,P <0.05)。当术前快肌评分的最佳阈值设定为 18.5 时,ROC 敏感性和特异性分别为 80.6% 和 61.2%:结论:术前盆底肌电图参数对前列腺癌术后尿失禁风险具有良好的预测准确性和临床适用性。这些参数可用于早期识别尿失禁风险,其中年龄和快速肌肉评分是重要的预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
北京大学学报(医学版)
北京大学学报(医学版) Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9815
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
[Clinical diagnosis and treatment of renal angiomyolipoma with inferior vena cava tumor thrombus]. [Clinical effects of transesophageal echocardiography in different surgical methods for nephrectomy combined with Mayo Ⅲ-Ⅳ vena tumor thrombectomy]. [Clinical treatment and prognosis of adrenocortical carcinoma with venous tumor thrombus]. [Construction of a predictive model for postoperative pain relief after microscopic spermatic cord surgery for spermatic cord pain]. [Association between the triglyceride-glucose index and the incidence of nephrolithiasis in male individuals].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1