Evaluating the Efficacy of the Diluted Schirmer Method for Tear Collection in Dry Eye Syndrome Patients.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Current Eye Research Pub Date : 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1080/02713683.2024.2380446
Li Yang, Xiuming Jin, Shengjia Hu, Pingping Yu, Xinchang Wang
{"title":"Evaluating the Efficacy of the Diluted Schirmer Method for Tear Collection in Dry Eye Syndrome Patients.","authors":"Li Yang, Xiuming Jin, Shengjia Hu, Pingping Yu, Xinchang Wang","doi":"10.1080/02713683.2024.2380446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study assesses the diluted Schirmer method's effectiveness in collecting tears from dry eye syndrome patients, aiming to identify the most suitable tear collection technique for them.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective study. Tear samples were collected from patients with dry eye syndrome and healthy individuals using two methods: (1) Direct Schirmer Method: Schirmer strips were directly inserted into the eye to collect tears. (2) Diluted Schirmer Method: After instilling physiological saline into the eye and waiting for 30 s to ensure thorough mixing with tears, Schirmer strips were used for collection. Tear samples from both groups were analyzed and compared for total protein and cytokine levels (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>(1) The study included 32 participants: 16 with dry eye syndrome (4 males, 12 females, average age 34.92 ± 10.13 years) and 16 healthy controls (5 males, 11 females, average age 32.25 ± 9.87 years). (2) The diluted Schirmer method produced a significantly larger tear volume compared to the direct method (<i>p</i> < 0.05), with lower Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores indicating less discomfort (<i>p</i> < 0.05). (3) The average total protein content of the two groups was 51.70 ± 3.166 ng measured by Direct Schirmer method, and the average total protein content of the Diluted Schirmer method was 50.05 ± 3.263 ng. There was no statistical difference between the two groups. (<i>t</i> = 1.051, <i>p</i> = 0.3098) (4) The concentrations of total tear protein and various cytokines measured by both methods were higher in the dry eye group compared to the normal group, with statistically significant differences (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Both methods reflected consistent changes in tear protein profiles.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The diluted Schirmer method can comfortably collect an adequate volume of tear samples in a short time and consistently reflect changes in tear proteins, making it an effective method for tear collection in patients with dry eye syndrome.</p>","PeriodicalId":10782,"journal":{"name":"Current Eye Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Eye Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2024.2380446","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study assesses the diluted Schirmer method's effectiveness in collecting tears from dry eye syndrome patients, aiming to identify the most suitable tear collection technique for them.

Methods: A prospective study. Tear samples were collected from patients with dry eye syndrome and healthy individuals using two methods: (1) Direct Schirmer Method: Schirmer strips were directly inserted into the eye to collect tears. (2) Diluted Schirmer Method: After instilling physiological saline into the eye and waiting for 30 s to ensure thorough mixing with tears, Schirmer strips were used for collection. Tear samples from both groups were analyzed and compared for total protein and cytokine levels (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α).

Results: (1) The study included 32 participants: 16 with dry eye syndrome (4 males, 12 females, average age 34.92 ± 10.13 years) and 16 healthy controls (5 males, 11 females, average age 32.25 ± 9.87 years). (2) The diluted Schirmer method produced a significantly larger tear volume compared to the direct method (p < 0.05), with lower Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores indicating less discomfort (p < 0.05). (3) The average total protein content of the two groups was 51.70 ± 3.166 ng measured by Direct Schirmer method, and the average total protein content of the Diluted Schirmer method was 50.05 ± 3.263 ng. There was no statistical difference between the two groups. (t = 1.051, p = 0.3098) (4) The concentrations of total tear protein and various cytokines measured by both methods were higher in the dry eye group compared to the normal group, with statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). Both methods reflected consistent changes in tear protein profiles.

Conclusion: The diluted Schirmer method can comfortably collect an adequate volume of tear samples in a short time and consistently reflect changes in tear proteins, making it an effective method for tear collection in patients with dry eye syndrome.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估稀释施尔默法对干眼症患者泪液采集的功效
目的:本研究评估了稀释施尔默法在收集干眼症患者泪液方面的有效性,旨在找出最适合干眼症患者的泪液收集技术:方法:前瞻性研究。采用两种方法收集干眼症患者和健康人的泪液样本:(1)直接施尔默法:将施尔默条直接插入眼球收集泪液。(2)稀释施尔默法:将生理盐水注入眼球,等待 30 秒以确保与泪液充分混合后,使用施尔默条收集泪液。对两组泪液样本的总蛋白和细胞因子水平(IL-1β、IL-6、IL-8、TNF-α)进行分析和比较:干眼症患者 16 人(男性 4 人,女性 12 人,平均年龄(34.92 ± 10.13)岁),健康对照组 16 人(男性 5 人,女性 11 人,平均年龄(32.25 ± 9.87)岁)。(2) 与直接法相比,稀释施尔默法产生的泪液量明显更大(p p t = 1.051,p = 0.3098) (4) 与正常组相比,两种方法测得的干眼组泪液总蛋白和各种细胞因子的浓度都更高,差异有统计学意义(p 结论:稀释施尔默法可用于干眼症患者的泪液检查:稀释施尔默法能在短时间内采集到足够量的泪液样本,并能持续反映泪液蛋白质的变化,是采集干眼症患者泪液样本的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Eye Research
Current Eye Research 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The principal aim of Current Eye Research is to provide rapid publication of full papers, short communications and mini-reviews, all high quality. Current Eye Research publishes articles encompassing all the areas of eye research. Subject areas include the following: clinical research, anatomy, physiology, biophysics, biochemistry, pharmacology, developmental biology, microbiology and immunology.
期刊最新文献
l-Serine Protects Murine Retinal Ganglion Cells from Oxidative Stress via Modulation of Mitochondrial Dysfunction. Intrastromal Corneal Ring Implants Associated Bacterial Infections. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Adalimumab Versus Cyclosporine for Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada Disease: A Randomized Controlled Study. Jagged1-Notch1 Signaling Pathway Induces M1 Microglia to Disrupt the Barrier Function of Retinal Microvascular Endothelial Cells. Safety and Efficacy of Dry Eye Intelligent Therapeutic Device in the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction in Rabbits.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1