Multiple karyotype differences between populations of the Hoplias malabaricus (Teleostei; Characiformes), a species complex in the gray area of the speciation process

IF 3.1 2区 生物学 Q2 ECOLOGY Heredity Pub Date : 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1038/s41437-024-00707-z
Fernando H. S. Souza, Manolo F. Perez, Pedro H. N. Ferreira, Luiz A. C. Bertollo, Tariq Ezaz, Deborah Charlesworth, Marcelo B. Cioffi
{"title":"Multiple karyotype differences between populations of the Hoplias malabaricus (Teleostei; Characiformes), a species complex in the gray area of the speciation process","authors":"Fernando H. S. Souza, Manolo F. Perez, Pedro H. N. Ferreira, Luiz A. C. Bertollo, Tariq Ezaz, Deborah Charlesworth, Marcelo B. Cioffi","doi":"10.1038/s41437-024-00707-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Neotropical fishes exhibit remarkable karyotype diversity, whose evolution is poorly understood. Here, we studied genetic differences in 60 individuals, from 11 localities of one species, the wolf fish Hoplias malabaricus, from populations that include six different “karyomorphs”. These differ in Y-X chromosome differentiation, and, in several cases, by fusions with autosomes that have resulted in multiple sex chromosomes. Other differences are also observed in diploid chromosome numbers and morphologies. In an attempt to start understanding how this diversity was generated, we analyzed within- and between-population differences in a genome-wide sequence data set. We detect clear genotype differences between karyomorphs. Even in sympatry, samples with different karyomorphs differ more in sequence than samples from allopatric populations of the same karyomorph, suggesting that they represent populations that are to some degree reproductively isolated. However, sequence divergence between populations with different karyomorphs is remarkably low, suggesting that chromosome rearrangements may have evolved during a brief evolutionary time. We suggest that the karyotypic differences probably evolved in allopatry, in small populations that would have allowed rapid fixation of rearrangements, and that they became sympatric after their differentiation. Further studies are needed to test whether the karyotype differences contribute to reproductive isolation detected between some H. malabaricus karyomorphs.","PeriodicalId":12991,"journal":{"name":"Heredity","volume":"133 4","pages":"216-226"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heredity","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41437-024-00707-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neotropical fishes exhibit remarkable karyotype diversity, whose evolution is poorly understood. Here, we studied genetic differences in 60 individuals, from 11 localities of one species, the wolf fish Hoplias malabaricus, from populations that include six different “karyomorphs”. These differ in Y-X chromosome differentiation, and, in several cases, by fusions with autosomes that have resulted in multiple sex chromosomes. Other differences are also observed in diploid chromosome numbers and morphologies. In an attempt to start understanding how this diversity was generated, we analyzed within- and between-population differences in a genome-wide sequence data set. We detect clear genotype differences between karyomorphs. Even in sympatry, samples with different karyomorphs differ more in sequence than samples from allopatric populations of the same karyomorph, suggesting that they represent populations that are to some degree reproductively isolated. However, sequence divergence between populations with different karyomorphs is remarkably low, suggesting that chromosome rearrangements may have evolved during a brief evolutionary time. We suggest that the karyotypic differences probably evolved in allopatry, in small populations that would have allowed rapid fixation of rearrangements, and that they became sympatric after their differentiation. Further studies are needed to test whether the karyotype differences contribute to reproductive isolation detected between some H. malabaricus karyomorphs.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
处于物种演化灰色地带的马拉巴里鱼(Hoplias malabaricus)种群之间存在多种核型差异。
新热带鱼类表现出显著的核型多样性,但对其进化却知之甚少。在这里,我们研究了一个物种--狼鱼 Hoplias malabaricus 的 11 个地方的 60 个个体的遗传差异,这些个体来自包括 6 种不同 "核型 "的种群。这些种群在 Y-X 染色体分化方面存在差异,在一些情况下,它们与常染色体融合,从而产生了多条性染色体。在二倍体染色体的数量和形态上也存在其他差异。为了开始了解这种多样性是如何产生的,我们分析了全基因组序列数据集中种群内和种群间的差异。我们发现核形态之间存在明显的基因型差异。即使在同域中,不同核型的样本在序列上的差异也比同一核型的异域种群样本大,这表明它们代表的种群在某种程度上是生殖隔离的。然而,不同核型种群之间的序列差异却非常小,这表明染色体重排可能是在短暂的进化过程中演变而来的。我们认为,核型差异很可能是在异地进化过程中,在小种群中发生的,这使得重排迅速固定下来,它们在分化后成为同域种。还需要进一步的研究来检验核型差异是否导致了某些马拉巴尔蝇核形态之间的生殖隔离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Heredity
Heredity 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
84
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Heredity is the official journal of the Genetics Society. It covers a broad range of topics within the field of genetics and therefore papers must address conceptual or applied issues of interest to the journal''s wide readership
期刊最新文献
Kinship clustering within an ecologically diverse killer whale metapopulation. Incorporating spatial and genetic competition into breeding pipelines with the R package gencomp. The evolution of preferred male traits, female preference and the G matrix: "Toto, I've a feeling we're not in Kansas anymore". Maternal effects in the model system Daphnia: the ecological past meets the epigenetic future. Infection pattern of male-killing viruses alters phenotypes in the tea tortrix moth Homona magnanima.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1