Association between perception of harm and valence of shoulder movement images with disability levels related to chronic shoulder pain.

IF 5.9 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY PAIN® Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-23 DOI:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003337
Marcela Camargo Tozzo, Felipe J J Reis, Rafael Krasic Alaiti, Gisele Harumi Hotta, Anamaria Siriani de Oliveira
{"title":"Association between perception of harm and valence of shoulder movement images with disability levels related to chronic shoulder pain.","authors":"Marcela Camargo Tozzo, Felipe J J Reis, Rafael Krasic Alaiti, Gisele Harumi Hotta, Anamaria Siriani de Oliveira","doi":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Recent studies highlight an interplay between pain perception and emotional responses. This necessitates a thorough investigation into how beliefs and motivational influences respond to visual stimuli of movements. Such an analysis is crucial for understanding the extent to which these factors contribute to disability levels associated with shoulder pain. We aimed to investigate the relationship between the perception of harm and the valence in images depicting shoulder movements and determine how these perceptions are linked to disability levels associated with shoulder pain. This cross-sectional study recruited 42 individuals with chronic shoulder pain. Participants were presented with 58 shoulder movements images. Each participant evaluated these images for emotional valence and arousal using the self-assessment manikin. For every image, they provided their level of avoidance, fear, and perception of harm in a numerical scale. We measured disability levels and pain catastrophizing using the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index and the Pain Catastrophizing Scale. A direct acyclic graph was used. Multiple linear regression analysis was conducted with shoulder disability as the dependent variable and perception of harm and valence as independent variables, adjusted for the confounders catastrophizing and arousal. This analysis resulted in a significant model ( F4,37 = 11.44; adjusted R2 = 0.547; P < 0.01). The perception of harm to shoulder movement (β = 0.11; P < 0.001; 95% confidence interval = 5.6-11.8) was significantly associated with the level of shoulder disability, whereas valence did not show a significant association (β = 0.26; P = 0.15; 95% confidence interval = 1.7-10.8). The perception of harm associated with shoulder movements images during daily activities was associated with disability. Individuals who believe that shoulder movements are harmful have greater disability.</p>","PeriodicalId":19921,"journal":{"name":"PAIN®","volume":" ","pages":"e10-e17"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PAIN®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003337","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Recent studies highlight an interplay between pain perception and emotional responses. This necessitates a thorough investigation into how beliefs and motivational influences respond to visual stimuli of movements. Such an analysis is crucial for understanding the extent to which these factors contribute to disability levels associated with shoulder pain. We aimed to investigate the relationship between the perception of harm and the valence in images depicting shoulder movements and determine how these perceptions are linked to disability levels associated with shoulder pain. This cross-sectional study recruited 42 individuals with chronic shoulder pain. Participants were presented with 58 shoulder movements images. Each participant evaluated these images for emotional valence and arousal using the self-assessment manikin. For every image, they provided their level of avoidance, fear, and perception of harm in a numerical scale. We measured disability levels and pain catastrophizing using the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index and the Pain Catastrophizing Scale. A direct acyclic graph was used. Multiple linear regression analysis was conducted with shoulder disability as the dependent variable and perception of harm and valence as independent variables, adjusted for the confounders catastrophizing and arousal. This analysis resulted in a significant model ( F4,37 = 11.44; adjusted R2 = 0.547; P < 0.01). The perception of harm to shoulder movement (β = 0.11; P < 0.001; 95% confidence interval = 5.6-11.8) was significantly associated with the level of shoulder disability, whereas valence did not show a significant association (β = 0.26; P = 0.15; 95% confidence interval = 1.7-10.8). The perception of harm associated with shoulder movements images during daily activities was associated with disability. Individuals who believe that shoulder movements are harmful have greater disability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肩部运动图像的伤害感和价值感与慢性肩痛相关残疾程度之间的关系。
摘要:最近的研究强调了痛觉和情绪反应之间的相互作用。这就需要对信念和动机影响如何对运动的视觉刺激做出反应进行深入研究。这种分析对于了解这些因素在多大程度上导致与肩痛相关的残疾程度至关重要。我们的目的是调查描述肩部运动的图像中伤害感知与情绪之间的关系,并确定这些感知与肩痛相关残疾程度之间的联系。这项横断面研究招募了 42 名慢性肩痛患者。研究人员向参与者展示了 58 幅肩部运动图像。每位受试者都使用自我评估人体模型对这些图像的情绪价值和唤醒程度进行了评估。对于每幅图像,他们都会以数字量表的形式提供其回避、恐惧和伤害感的程度。我们使用肩部疼痛和残疾指数以及疼痛灾难化量表来测量残疾程度和疼痛灾难化程度。我们使用了直接非循环图。以肩部残疾为因变量,伤害感和愉悦感为自变量,进行了多元线性回归分析,并对灾难化和唤醒这两个混杂因素进行了调整。该分析得出了一个重要的模型(F4,37 = 11.44;调整后的 R2 = 0.547;P < 0.01)。肩部运动伤害感(β = 0.11;P < 0.001;95% 置信区间 = 5.6-11.8)与肩部残疾程度显著相关,而愉悦感与肩部残疾程度无显著相关(β = 0.26;P = 0.15;95% 置信区间 = 1.7-10.8)。在日常活动中,肩部运动图像的伤害感与残疾有关。认为肩部运动有害的人残疾程度更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PAIN®
PAIN® 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
8.10%
发文量
242
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: PAIN® is the official publication of the International Association for the Study of Pain and publishes original research on the nature,mechanisms and treatment of pain.PAIN® provides a forum for the dissemination of research in the basic and clinical sciences of multidisciplinary interest.
期刊最新文献
Experiencing pain: perspectives of Patrick D. Wall-founding editor of the journal PAIN. The effect of top-down attention on secondary mechanical hyperalgesia: improvements and controversies? The social nature of human pain. Prediction of the response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in peripheral neuropathic pain and validation of a new algorithm. Adolescent predictors of young adult pain and health outcomes: results from a 6-year prospective follow-up study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1