Trends in Black-White Differences of Antihypertensive Treatment in Individuals With and Without History of Stroke.

IF 7.8 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Stroke Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.046877
Brian Stamm, Regina Royan, Jinhong Cui, D Leann Long, Christina M Lineback, Oluwasegun P Akinyelure, Timothy B Plante, Deborah A Levine, Virginia J Howard, George Howard, Philip B Gorelick
{"title":"Trends in Black-White Differences of Antihypertensive Treatment in Individuals With and Without History of Stroke.","authors":"Brian Stamm, Regina Royan, Jinhong Cui, D Leann Long, Christina M Lineback, Oluwasegun P Akinyelure, Timothy B Plante, Deborah A Levine, Virginia J Howard, George Howard, Philip B Gorelick","doi":"10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.046877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent hypertension guidelines for the general population have included race-specific recommendations for antihypertensives, whereas current stroke-specific recommendations for antihypertensives do not vary by race. The impact of these guidelines on antihypertensive regimen changes over time, and if this has varied by prevalent stroke status, is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The use of antihypertensive medications was studied cross-sectionally among self-identified Black and White participants, aged ≥45 years, with and without history of stroke, from the REGARDS study (Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke). Participants completed an in-home examination in 2003-2007 (visit 1) with/without an examination in 2013-2016 (visit 2). Stratified by prevalent stroke status, logistic regression mixed models examined associations between antihypertensive class use for visit 2 versus visit 1 and Black versus White individuals with an interaction adjusted for demographics, socioeconomic status, and vascular risk factors/vital signs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 17 244 stroke-free participants at visit 1, Black participants had greater adjusted odds of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor usage than White participants (odds ratio [OR], 1.51 [95% CI, 1.30-1.77]). This difference was smaller in the 7476 stroke-free participants at visit 2 (OR, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.08-1.25]). In stroke-free participants at visit 1, Black participants had lower odds of calcium channel blocker (CCB) usage than White participants (OR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.41-0.55]), but CCB usage did not differ significantly between Black and White stroke-free participants at visit 2 (OR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.95-1.09]). Among 1437 stroke survivor participants at visit 1, Black participants had lower odds of CCB use than White participants (OR, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.26-0.45]). In 689 stroke survivor participants at visit 2, CCB use did not differ between Black and White participants (OR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.61-1.06]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Racial differences in the use of guideline-recommended antihypertensives decreased between 2003-2007 and 2013-2016 in stroke-free individuals. In stroke survivors, racial differences in CCB usage narrowed over the time periods. These findings suggest there is still a mismatch between race-specific hypertension guidelines and recent clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":21989,"journal":{"name":"Stroke","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.046877","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recent hypertension guidelines for the general population have included race-specific recommendations for antihypertensives, whereas current stroke-specific recommendations for antihypertensives do not vary by race. The impact of these guidelines on antihypertensive regimen changes over time, and if this has varied by prevalent stroke status, is unclear.

Methods: The use of antihypertensive medications was studied cross-sectionally among self-identified Black and White participants, aged ≥45 years, with and without history of stroke, from the REGARDS study (Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke). Participants completed an in-home examination in 2003-2007 (visit 1) with/without an examination in 2013-2016 (visit 2). Stratified by prevalent stroke status, logistic regression mixed models examined associations between antihypertensive class use for visit 2 versus visit 1 and Black versus White individuals with an interaction adjusted for demographics, socioeconomic status, and vascular risk factors/vital signs.

Results: Of 17 244 stroke-free participants at visit 1, Black participants had greater adjusted odds of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor usage than White participants (odds ratio [OR], 1.51 [95% CI, 1.30-1.77]). This difference was smaller in the 7476 stroke-free participants at visit 2 (OR, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.08-1.25]). In stroke-free participants at visit 1, Black participants had lower odds of calcium channel blocker (CCB) usage than White participants (OR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.41-0.55]), but CCB usage did not differ significantly between Black and White stroke-free participants at visit 2 (OR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.95-1.09]). Among 1437 stroke survivor participants at visit 1, Black participants had lower odds of CCB use than White participants (OR, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.26-0.45]). In 689 stroke survivor participants at visit 2, CCB use did not differ between Black and White participants (OR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.61-1.06]).

Conclusions: Racial differences in the use of guideline-recommended antihypertensives decreased between 2003-2007 and 2013-2016 in stroke-free individuals. In stroke survivors, racial differences in CCB usage narrowed over the time periods. These findings suggest there is still a mismatch between race-specific hypertension guidelines and recent clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有中风史和无中风史人群中抗高血压治疗的黑白差异趋势。
背景:最近针对普通人群的高血压指南包括针对不同种族的降压药建议,而目前针对卒中的降压药建议并不因种族而异。这些指南对降压治疗方案随时间推移而变化的影响,以及这种变化是否因中风流行状况而异,尚不清楚:对 REGARDS 研究(中风的地域和种族差异原因)中自认为年龄≥ 45 岁、有中风史和无中风史的黑人和白人参与者使用降压药物的情况进行了横截面研究。参与者在 2003-2007 年(访问 1)完成了一次上门检查,并在 2013-2016 年(访问 2)完成/未完成检查。根据流行性卒中状况进行分层,逻辑回归混合模型检验了第 2 次与第 1 次、黑人与白人使用降压类药物之间的关系,并对人口统计学、社会经济状况和血管风险因素/生命体征进行了交互调整:在第 1 次就诊的 17 244 名无中风参与者中,黑人比白人使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的调整后几率更高(几率比 [OR],1.51 [95% CI,1.30-1.77])。在第 2 次就诊的 7476 名无中风参与者中,这一差异较小(OR,1.16 [95% CI,1.08-1.25])。在第 1 次就诊的无卒中参与者中,黑人参与者使用钙通道阻滞剂 (CCB) 的几率低于白人参与者(OR,0.47 [95% CI,0.41-0.55]),但在第 2 次就诊的无卒中参与者中,黑人和白人使用 CCB 的差异不大(OR,1.02 [95% CI,0.95-1.09])。在 1 次就诊的 1437 名中风幸存者中,黑人参与者使用 CCB 的几率低于白人参与者(OR,0.34 [95% CI,0.26-0.45])。在第 2 次就诊的 689 名中风幸存者中,黑人和白人使用氯吡咯并无差异(OR,0.80 [95% CI,0.61-1.06]):结论:2003-2007 年和 2013-2016 年间,无中风患者使用指南推荐的降压药的种族差异有所减少。在中风幸存者中,使用 CCB 的种族差异在这一时期有所缩小。这些发现表明,特定种族的高血压指南与近期的临床实践之间仍存在不匹配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Stroke
Stroke 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
6.00%
发文量
2021
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Stroke is a monthly publication that collates reports of clinical and basic investigation of any aspect of the cerebral circulation and its diseases. The publication covers a wide range of disciplines including anesthesiology, critical care medicine, epidemiology, internal medicine, neurology, neuro-ophthalmology, neuropathology, neuropsychology, neurosurgery, nuclear medicine, nursing, radiology, rehabilitation, speech pathology, vascular physiology, and vascular surgery. The audience of Stroke includes neurologists, basic scientists, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, internists, interventionalists, neurosurgeons, nurses, and physiatrists. Stroke is indexed in Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts, CINAHL, Current Contents, Embase, MEDLINE, and Science Citation Index Expanded.
期刊最新文献
CADA-PRO: A Patient Questionnaire Measuring Key Cognitive, Motor, Emotional, and Behavioral Outcomes in CADASIL. On-Device Deep Learning to Detect Carotid Stenosis With Smartphones: Development and Validation. Optogenetic Functional Activation Is Detrimental During Acute Ischemic Stroke in Mice. Rural Hospital Performance in Guideline-Recommended Ischemic Stroke Thrombolysis, Secondary Prevention, and Outcomes. The Imaging-Neuropathological Gap in Acute Large Vessel Occlusive Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1