An Assessment of 1067 Light Curing Units Measured Twice Between 2015 and 2021.

IF 1.1 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1922/EJPRD_2693Price10
R B Price, J L Ferracane, C Felix, F Che
{"title":"An Assessment of 1067 Light Curing Units Measured Twice Between 2015 and 2021.","authors":"R B Price, J L Ferracane, C Felix, F Che","doi":"10.1922/EJPRD_2693Price10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The physical condition of the tip and the irradiance of LCUs used in dental offices in the United States and Canada was assessed twice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The tip irradiance and physical condition of the tip of 1067 LCUs from 544 dental clinics were assessed twice between 2015 and 2021 using the CheckMARC (BlueLight) radiometer. The irradiance values were compared by paired Student's t-test (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a wide range of irradiance values (200 to 3,777 mW/cm²). At the first assessment, only 26% of the LCUs had no visible damage or debris on the LCU tip. When retested up to 36 months later, 70% of the LCUs had their tip damage or debris issues entirely or partially resolved. 2.6% of the LCUs delivered an irradiance below 500 mW/cm² on the first and 1.6% on the second assessments. For the 5 brands that had a sufficient sample size, it was concluded that the irradiance increased when the tip damage or presence of tip debris was resolved.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Initially, most LCUs (74%) had at least one problem related to damage or debris on the LCU tip. The irradiance increased when the tip damage or debris was resolved.</p>","PeriodicalId":45686,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"346-355"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2693Price10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The physical condition of the tip and the irradiance of LCUs used in dental offices in the United States and Canada was assessed twice.

Methods: The tip irradiance and physical condition of the tip of 1067 LCUs from 544 dental clinics were assessed twice between 2015 and 2021 using the CheckMARC (BlueLight) radiometer. The irradiance values were compared by paired Student's t-test (α = 0.05).

Results: There was a wide range of irradiance values (200 to 3,777 mW/cm²). At the first assessment, only 26% of the LCUs had no visible damage or debris on the LCU tip. When retested up to 36 months later, 70% of the LCUs had their tip damage or debris issues entirely or partially resolved. 2.6% of the LCUs delivered an irradiance below 500 mW/cm² on the first and 1.6% on the second assessments. For the 5 brands that had a sufficient sample size, it was concluded that the irradiance increased when the tip damage or presence of tip debris was resolved.

Conclusions: Initially, most LCUs (74%) had at least one problem related to damage or debris on the LCU tip. The irradiance increased when the tip damage or debris was resolved.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对 2015 至 2021 年间两次测量的 1067 个光固化单元进行评估。
介绍:对美国和加拿大牙科诊所使用的低辐照度装置的尖端物理状况和辐照度进行了两次评估:方法:在 2015 年至 2021 年期间,使用 CheckMARC (BlueLight) 辐照度计对来自 544 家牙科诊所的 1067 个 LCU 的尖端辐照度和尖端物理状况进行了两次评估。辐照度值通过配对学生 t 检验(α = 0.05)进行比较:结果:辐照度值的范围很广(200 至 3,777 mW/cm²)。在首次评估时,只有 26% 的 LCU 的顶端没有明显的损坏或碎片。36 个月后再次测试时,70% 的 LCU 已完全或部分解决了顶端损坏或碎片问题。2.6% 的 LCU 在第一次和第二次评估中的辐照度分别低于 500 mW/cm²和 1.6%。对于样本量足够大的 5 个品牌,结论是当顶端损坏或存在顶端碎片的问题得到解决后,辐照度会增加:最初,大多数 LCU(74%)至少有一个与 LCU 尖端损坏或碎片有关的问题。当顶端损坏或碎片得到解决时,辐照度就会增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry is published quarterly and includes clinical and research articles in subjects such as prosthodontics, operative dentistry, implantology, endodontics, periodontics and dental materials.
期刊最新文献
Accuracy of Intra-Oral Scanners for Full Crown Tooth Preparations with Subgingival Margins: A Systematic Review. Description and Durability of the Various Direct Restoration Techniques in Molar-Incisor Hypomineralization: A Systematic Review. Does the Learning Curve for Intraoral Scanning Vary Depending on the Device? Influence of Surface Roughness on the Adhesion of Hydroxyapatite Coatings to Titanium and Titanium Alloy Surfaces: A Systematic Review of in vitro Experimental Studies. Performance of Fiberglass Posts Versus Fiber- Reinforced Resin Composites in Endodontically Treated Anterior Teeth Without Ferrule: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1