Feasibility of a home-based exercise intervention for patients with systemic sclerosis.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Physiotherapy Theory and Practice Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI:10.1080/09593985.2024.2377348
Peter Alsing, Mie Ladefoged Assmann, Thomas Linddal Kristensen, Esben Uggerby Næser, Klaus Søndergaard, Annette de Thurah, Inger Mechlenburg
{"title":"Feasibility of a home-based exercise intervention for patients with systemic sclerosis.","authors":"Peter Alsing, Mie Ladefoged Assmann, Thomas Linddal Kristensen, Esben Uggerby Næser, Klaus Søndergaard, Annette de Thurah, Inger Mechlenburg","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2024.2377348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare connective tissue disease causing pain, reduced mobility and decreased health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Studies suggest that exercise is a necessary adjunct to the medical treatment.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine the feasibility of a 12-week home-based exercise program for SSc patients, and evaluate changes in physical function, HRQoL and SSc-related symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty patients were enrolled in the study. Feasibility was measured by adherence, adverse events, and exercise task self-efficacy. At baseline and follow-up patients completed the 6-minute walk test, 30-second sit-to-stand test, 30-second arm curl, SSc Impact of Disease (ScleroID) and 36-item short form survey (SF-36).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median adherence to the intervention was 36 (interquartile range 27-36) out of a total of 36 exercise sessions. Fifteen patients completed the intervention, with three dropouts. Patients' exercise task self-efficacy was 98%, 93% and 78%, for one, two and three weekly exercise sessions, respectively. There were no adverse events related to the exercise sessions. Improvements were observed in all physical tests, and minor improvements in HRQoL and SSc-related symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that a home-based exercise intervention is feasible for patients with SSc. The results suggest improvements in physical function, HRQoL and SSc-related symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2024.2377348","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare connective tissue disease causing pain, reduced mobility and decreased health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Studies suggest that exercise is a necessary adjunct to the medical treatment.

Purpose: To examine the feasibility of a 12-week home-based exercise program for SSc patients, and evaluate changes in physical function, HRQoL and SSc-related symptoms.

Methods: Twenty patients were enrolled in the study. Feasibility was measured by adherence, adverse events, and exercise task self-efficacy. At baseline and follow-up patients completed the 6-minute walk test, 30-second sit-to-stand test, 30-second arm curl, SSc Impact of Disease (ScleroID) and 36-item short form survey (SF-36).

Results: Median adherence to the intervention was 36 (interquartile range 27-36) out of a total of 36 exercise sessions. Fifteen patients completed the intervention, with three dropouts. Patients' exercise task self-efficacy was 98%, 93% and 78%, for one, two and three weekly exercise sessions, respectively. There were no adverse events related to the exercise sessions. Improvements were observed in all physical tests, and minor improvements in HRQoL and SSc-related symptoms.

Conclusion: This study suggests that a home-based exercise intervention is feasible for patients with SSc. The results suggest improvements in physical function, HRQoL and SSc-related symptoms.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为系统性硬化症患者提供家庭运动干预的可行性。
简介系统性硬化症(SSc)是一种罕见的结缔组织疾病,可导致疼痛、活动能力下降和健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)降低。研究表明,运动是药物治疗的必要辅助手段。目的:研究针对系统性硬化症患者的为期 12 周的家庭运动计划的可行性,并评估其身体功能、HRQoL 和 SSc 相关症状的变化:研究共招募了 20 名患者。方法:20 名患者参加了这项研究,研究的可行性通过坚持性、不良事件和运动任务自我效能来衡量。患者在基线和随访期间完成了6分钟步行测试、30秒坐立测试、30秒卷臂测试、SSc疾病影响(ScleroID)和36项短表调查(SF-36):在总共 36 次锻炼中,坚持干预的中位数为 36 次(四分位数间距为 27-36)。15名患者完成了干预,3人退出。每周进行一次、两次和三次锻炼的患者对锻炼任务的自我效能感分别为98%、93%和78%。运动过程中未发生任何不良事件。所有体能测试结果均有所改善,患者的 HRQoL 和 SSc 相关症状也略有改善:本研究表明,对 SSc 患者进行家庭锻炼干预是可行的。结论:这项研究表明,对 SSc 患者进行居家运动干预是可行的,其结果表明,患者的身体功能、心身健康状况和 SSc 相关症状均有所改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.
期刊最新文献
Women's experiences of physical therapy treatment for vulvodynia. Teaching person-centered practice to pre-registration physiotherapy students: a qualitative study. Physiotherapy provided for patients undergoing thoracic surgery in Sweden - a national survey of practice. Patients' lived body experiences in the intensive care unit and beyond - a meta-ethnographic synthesis. The quality of life in individuals with Parkinson's Disease: is it related to functionality and tremor severity? A cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1