The association between serum fructosamine and random spot urine fructose levels with the severity of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease - an analytical cross-sectional study.
{"title":"The association between serum fructosamine and random spot urine fructose levels with the severity of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease - an analytical cross-sectional study.","authors":"H Kamuzinzi, M Kgomo, P Rheeder, N Dada, P Bester","doi":"10.7196/SAMJ.2024.v114i6.1748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in South Africa and Africa at large is considered a hidden threat. Our local population is burdened with increased metabolic risk factors for NAFLD. Our setting requires a reasonable approach to screen for and aid the diagnosis of NAFLD.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate serum fructosamine and random spot urine fructose levels as biomarkers for the screening, diagnosis and monitoring of NAFLD. The primary objective of this study was to compare serum fructosamine and random spot urine fructose levels between groups with different levels of NAFLD severity as measured by ultrasound. A secondary objective was to determine the association, if any, between serum transaminases, the aspartate aminotransferase (AST) to platelet ratio index (APRI) score, serum fructosamine and urine fructose in different groups with steatosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a cross-sectional study design, 65 patients with three different levels of NAFLD, as detected by imaging, were enrolled. The primary exposures measured were serum fructosamine with random spot urine fructose, and secondary exposures were the serum transaminases (AST and alanine aminotransferase (ALT)) and the APRI score. Patients identified at the departments of gastroenterology, general internal medicine and diagnostic radiology were invited to participate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 38, 17 and 10 patients with mild, moderate and severe steatosis, respectively. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding serum fructosamine, measured as median (interquartile range): mild 257 (241 - 286) μmol/L, moderate 239 (230 - 280) μmol/L and severe 260 (221 - 341) μmol/L, p=0.5; or random spot urine fructose: mild 0.86 (0.51 - 1.30) mmol/L, moderate 0.84 (0.51 - 2.62) mmol/L and severe 0.71 (0.58 - 1.09) mmol/L, p = 0.8. ALT (U/L) differed between groups: mild 19 (12 - 27), moderate 27 (22 - 33), severe 27 (21 - 56), p=0.03, but not AST (U/L) (p=0.7) nor APRI (p=0.9). Urine fructose and ALT were correlated in the moderate to severe steatosis group (R=0.490, p<0.05), but not in the mild steatosis group. Serum fructosamine was associated with age in the mild steatosis group but not the moderate-severe steatosis group (R=0.42, p<0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Serum fructosamine and random spot urine fructose did not vary with the severity of NAFLD, indicating that they would not be useful biomarkers in this condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":49576,"journal":{"name":"Samj South African Medical Journal","volume":"114 6","pages":"e1748"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Samj South African Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2024.v114i6.1748","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in South Africa and Africa at large is considered a hidden threat. Our local population is burdened with increased metabolic risk factors for NAFLD. Our setting requires a reasonable approach to screen for and aid the diagnosis of NAFLD.
Objectives: To investigate serum fructosamine and random spot urine fructose levels as biomarkers for the screening, diagnosis and monitoring of NAFLD. The primary objective of this study was to compare serum fructosamine and random spot urine fructose levels between groups with different levels of NAFLD severity as measured by ultrasound. A secondary objective was to determine the association, if any, between serum transaminases, the aspartate aminotransferase (AST) to platelet ratio index (APRI) score, serum fructosamine and urine fructose in different groups with steatosis.
Methods: Using a cross-sectional study design, 65 patients with three different levels of NAFLD, as detected by imaging, were enrolled. The primary exposures measured were serum fructosamine with random spot urine fructose, and secondary exposures were the serum transaminases (AST and alanine aminotransferase (ALT)) and the APRI score. Patients identified at the departments of gastroenterology, general internal medicine and diagnostic radiology were invited to participate.
Results: There were 38, 17 and 10 patients with mild, moderate and severe steatosis, respectively. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding serum fructosamine, measured as median (interquartile range): mild 257 (241 - 286) μmol/L, moderate 239 (230 - 280) μmol/L and severe 260 (221 - 341) μmol/L, p=0.5; or random spot urine fructose: mild 0.86 (0.51 - 1.30) mmol/L, moderate 0.84 (0.51 - 2.62) mmol/L and severe 0.71 (0.58 - 1.09) mmol/L, p = 0.8. ALT (U/L) differed between groups: mild 19 (12 - 27), moderate 27 (22 - 33), severe 27 (21 - 56), p=0.03, but not AST (U/L) (p=0.7) nor APRI (p=0.9). Urine fructose and ALT were correlated in the moderate to severe steatosis group (R=0.490, p<0.05), but not in the mild steatosis group. Serum fructosamine was associated with age in the mild steatosis group but not the moderate-severe steatosis group (R=0.42, p<0.01).
Conclusion: Serum fructosamine and random spot urine fructose did not vary with the severity of NAFLD, indicating that they would not be useful biomarkers in this condition.
期刊介绍:
The SAMJ is a monthly peer reviewed, internationally indexed, general medical journal. It carries The SAMJ is a monthly, peer-reviewed, internationally indexed, general medical journal publishing leading research impacting clinical care in Africa. The Journal is not limited to articles that have ‘general medical content’, but is intending to capture the spectrum of medical and health sciences, grouped by relevance to the country’s burden of disease. This will include research in the social sciences and economics that is relevant to the medical issues around our burden of disease
The journal carries research articles and letters, editorials, clinical practice and other medical articles and personal opinion, South African health-related news, obituaries, general correspondence, and classified advertisements (refer to the section policies for further information).