Structural Racism in Newborn Drug Testing: Perspectives of Health Care and Child Protective Services Professionals.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Annals of Family Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1370/afm.3139
Carol Shetty, Lauren Oshman, Amanda Costa, Victoria Waidley, Emily Madlambayan, Madgean Joassaint, Katharine McCabe, Courtney Townsel, Justine P Wu, Christopher J Frank, P Paul Chandanabhumma
{"title":"Structural Racism in Newborn Drug Testing: Perspectives of Health Care and Child Protective Services Professionals.","authors":"Carol Shetty, Lauren Oshman, Amanda Costa, Victoria Waidley, Emily Madlambayan, Madgean Joassaint, Katharine McCabe, Courtney Townsel, Justine P Wu, Christopher J Frank, P Paul Chandanabhumma","doi":"10.1370/afm.3139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Black birthing parents and their newborns disproportionately experience newborn drug testing for prenatal substance exposure by health care professionals (HCPs), which contributes to Child Protective Services (CPS) reporting, family separation, and termination of parental rights. This qualitative study aims to interrogate dominant power structures by exploring knowledge, attitudes, and experiences of HCPs and CPS professionals regarding the influence of structural racism on inequities in newborn drug testing practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semistructured interviews with 30 physicians, midwives, nurses, social workers, and CPS professionals guided by an explanatory framework, and conducted inductive, reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 3 primary themes: (1) levels of racism beyond the hospital structure contributed to higher rates of drug testing for Black newborns; (2) inconsistent hospital policies led to racialized application of state law and downstream CPS reporting; and (3) health care professionals knowledge of the benefits and disproportionate harms of CPS reporting on Black families influenced their decision making.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Health care professionals recognized structural racism as a driver of disproportionate newborn drug testing. Lack of knowledge and skill limitations of HCPs were barriers to dismantling power structures, thus impeding systems-level change. Institutional changes should shift focus from biologic testing and reporting to supporting the mutual needs of birthing parent and child through family-centered substance use treatment. State and federal policy changes are needed to ensure health equity for Black families and eliminate reporting to CPS for prenatal substance exposure when no concern for child abuse and neglect exists.</p>","PeriodicalId":50973,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Family Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11268687/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.3139","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Black birthing parents and their newborns disproportionately experience newborn drug testing for prenatal substance exposure by health care professionals (HCPs), which contributes to Child Protective Services (CPS) reporting, family separation, and termination of parental rights. This qualitative study aims to interrogate dominant power structures by exploring knowledge, attitudes, and experiences of HCPs and CPS professionals regarding the influence of structural racism on inequities in newborn drug testing practices.

Methods: We conducted semistructured interviews with 30 physicians, midwives, nurses, social workers, and CPS professionals guided by an explanatory framework, and conducted inductive, reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: We identified 3 primary themes: (1) levels of racism beyond the hospital structure contributed to higher rates of drug testing for Black newborns; (2) inconsistent hospital policies led to racialized application of state law and downstream CPS reporting; and (3) health care professionals knowledge of the benefits and disproportionate harms of CPS reporting on Black families influenced their decision making.

Conclusion: Health care professionals recognized structural racism as a driver of disproportionate newborn drug testing. Lack of knowledge and skill limitations of HCPs were barriers to dismantling power structures, thus impeding systems-level change. Institutional changes should shift focus from biologic testing and reporting to supporting the mutual needs of birthing parent and child through family-centered substance use treatment. State and federal policy changes are needed to ensure health equity for Black families and eliminate reporting to CPS for prenatal substance exposure when no concern for child abuse and neglect exists.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新生儿药物检测中的结构性种族主义:医疗保健和儿童保护服务专业人员的观点。
目的:黑人生育父母和他们的新生儿在接受新生儿药物检测时,过多地受到医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)产前药物暴露的影响,这导致了儿童保护服务(CPS)报告、家庭分离和父母权利终止。本定性研究旨在通过探讨医疗保健专业人员和儿童保护服务专业人员对结构性种族主义对新生儿药物检测实践中的不平等现象的影响的认识、态度和经验,对主流权力结构进行质询:在解释性框架的指导下,我们对 30 名医生、助产士、护士、社工和 CPS 专业人员进行了半结构式访谈,并进行了归纳、反思性主题分析:我们确定了 3 个主要主题:(1)医院结构之外的种族主义水平导致黑人新生儿药物检测率较高;(2)不一致的医院政策导致州法律和下游 CPS 报告的种族化应用;以及(3)医护专业人员对 CPS 报告对黑人家庭的益处和不成比例的伤害的了解影响了他们的决策:医护专业人员认识到结构性种族主义是导致新生儿药物检测比例过高的原因之一。医护人员知识的匮乏和技能的局限性阻碍了权力结构的瓦解,从而阻碍了制度层面的变革。制度变革应将重点从生物检测和报告转移到通过以家庭为中心的药物使用治疗来支持分娩父母和婴儿的共同需求。需要改变州和联邦政策,以确保黑人家庭的健康公平,并在不存在虐待和忽视儿童问题的情况下,消除向儿童保护机构报告产前药物暴露的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Family Medicine
Annals of Family Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
142
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals of Family Medicine is a peer-reviewed research journal to meet the needs of scientists, practitioners, policymakers, and the patients and communities they serve.
期刊最新文献
Prehospital Clinical Decision-Making for Medication Administration for Behavioral Emergencies. Rapid Antigen Testing in School Health Offices for Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza A. Assessment and comparison of the ILI case definition in clinical and school-based community settings: ORCHARDS/IISP. Efficacy and Safety of BB-12 Supplemented Strawberry Yogurt For Healthy Children on Antibiotics (PLAY ON). Exploratory Pilot Studies to Demonstrate Mechanisms of Preventing Antibiotic-Associated Diarrhea and the Role for Probiotics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1