Qualitative Exploration of the #MeTooMedicine Online Discourse: "Holding Beacons of Light to Shine in the Corners They Are Hoping to Keep Dark".

IF 5.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Academic Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000005828
Kori A LaDonna, Emily Field, Lindsay Cowley, Shiphra Ginsburg, Chris Watling, Rachael Pack
{"title":"Qualitative Exploration of the #MeTooMedicine Online Discourse: \"Holding Beacons of Light to Shine in the Corners They Are Hoping to Keep Dark\".","authors":"Kori A LaDonna, Emily Field, Lindsay Cowley, Shiphra Ginsburg, Chris Watling, Rachael Pack","doi":"10.1097/ACM.0000000000005828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The MeToo movement forced a social reckoning, spurring women in medicine to engage in the #MeTooMedicine online discourse. Given the risks of reporting sexual violence, discrimination, or harassment, it is important to understand how women in medicine use platforms like Twitter to publicly discuss their experiences. With such knowledge, the profession can use the public documentation of women in medicine for transformative change.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Using reflexive thematic analysis, 7,983 tweets (posted between November 2017-January 2020) associated with #WomenInMedicine, #MeTooMedicine, and #TimesUpHC were systematically analyzed in 2020-2022, iteratively moving from describing their content, to identifying thematic patterns, to conceptualizing the purpose the tweets appeared to serve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Twitter engagement of women in medicine was likened to \"holding beacons of light to shine in the corners [harassers] are hoping to keep dark,\" both reinforcing the message that \"gender bias is alive and well\" and calling for a \"complete transformation in how we approach\" the problem. The tweets of women in medicine primarily seemed aimed at disrupting complacency; encouraging bystanders to become allies; challenging stereotypes about women in medicine; championing individual women leaders, peers, and trainees; and advocating for reporting mechanisms and policies to ensure safety and accountability across medical workplaces.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women in medicine appeared to use Twitter for a host of reasons: for amplification, peer support, advocacy, and seeking accountability. By sharing their experiences publicly, women in medicine seemed to make a persuasive argument that time is up, providing would-be allies with supporting evidence of sexual violence, discrimination, and harassment. Their tweets suggest a roadmap for what is needed to achieve gender equity, ensure that lack of awareness is no longer an excuse, and ask bystanders to grapple with why women's accounts continue to be overlooked, ignored, or dismissed and how they will support women moving forward.</p>","PeriodicalId":50929,"journal":{"name":"Academic Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005828","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The MeToo movement forced a social reckoning, spurring women in medicine to engage in the #MeTooMedicine online discourse. Given the risks of reporting sexual violence, discrimination, or harassment, it is important to understand how women in medicine use platforms like Twitter to publicly discuss their experiences. With such knowledge, the profession can use the public documentation of women in medicine for transformative change.

Method: Using reflexive thematic analysis, 7,983 tweets (posted between November 2017-January 2020) associated with #WomenInMedicine, #MeTooMedicine, and #TimesUpHC were systematically analyzed in 2020-2022, iteratively moving from describing their content, to identifying thematic patterns, to conceptualizing the purpose the tweets appeared to serve.

Results: The Twitter engagement of women in medicine was likened to "holding beacons of light to shine in the corners [harassers] are hoping to keep dark," both reinforcing the message that "gender bias is alive and well" and calling for a "complete transformation in how we approach" the problem. The tweets of women in medicine primarily seemed aimed at disrupting complacency; encouraging bystanders to become allies; challenging stereotypes about women in medicine; championing individual women leaders, peers, and trainees; and advocating for reporting mechanisms and policies to ensure safety and accountability across medical workplaces.

Conclusions: Women in medicine appeared to use Twitter for a host of reasons: for amplification, peer support, advocacy, and seeking accountability. By sharing their experiences publicly, women in medicine seemed to make a persuasive argument that time is up, providing would-be allies with supporting evidence of sexual violence, discrimination, and harassment. Their tweets suggest a roadmap for what is needed to achieve gender equity, ensure that lack of awareness is no longer an excuse, and ask bystanders to grapple with why women's accounts continue to be overlooked, ignored, or dismissed and how they will support women moving forward.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对 #MeTooMedicine 网络言论的定性探索:"在他们希望保持黑暗的角落点亮灯塔"。
目的:"MeToo "运动迫使社会进行反思,促使医学界女性参与 #MeTooMedicine 在线讨论。鉴于报告性暴力、歧视或骚扰的风险,了解医学界女性如何利用 Twitter 等平台公开讨论她们的经历非常重要。有了这些知识,医学界就可以利用医学界女性的公开记录来实现变革:采用反思性主题分析方法,在 2020-2022 年对 7983 条与 #WomenInMedicine、#MeTooMedicine 和 #TimesUpHC 相关的推文(发布时间为 2017 年 11 月至 2020 年 1 月)进行了系统分析,从描述推文内容到识别主题模式,再到概念化推文的目的:医学界女性在推特上的参与被比喻为 "在[骚扰者]希望保持黑暗的角落里点亮灯塔",既强化了 "性别偏见依然存在 "的信息,又呼吁 "彻底改变我们处理这一问题的方式"。医学界女性的推文似乎主要旨在打破自满情绪;鼓励旁观者成为盟友;挑战对医学界女性的刻板印象;支持女性领导者、同行和受训者个人;倡导报告机制和政策,以确保整个医疗工作场所的安全和问责:医学界女性使用 Twitter 似乎有很多原因:扩大影响、同行支持、宣传和寻求问责。通过公开分享她们的经历,女医务人员似乎提出了一个有说服力的论点:时间到了,为可能的盟友提供了性暴力、歧视和骚扰的佐证。她们的推文为实现性别平等提供了路线图,确保缺乏意识不再是借口,并要求旁观者努力解决为什么女性的叙述继续被忽视、忽略或驳回的问题,以及她们将如何支持女性继续前进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Medicine
Academic Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
982
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, acts as an international forum for exchanging ideas, information, and strategies to address the significant challenges in academic medicine. The journal covers areas such as research, education, clinical care, community collaboration, and leadership, with a commitment to serving the public interest.
期刊最新文献
In Reply to McBride and Walsh. A Critical Look at Racism in the Clinical Learning Environment and the Erasure of DEI Efforts. Championing Civility in the Clinical Learning Environment: Evaluation of a Novel Training Program. Simulation vs RISE UP: A Comparative Study of Approaches for Teaching Emergency Medicine Trainees How to Manage Microaggressions. The Potential of Using ChatGPT-4 Vision for Detecting Image Manipulation in Academic Medicine Articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1