Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir Regimen for Mild/Moderately Severe COVID-19: A Rapid Review With Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Annals of Family Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1370/afm.3120
George N Okoli, Nicole Askin, Rasheda Rabbani
{"title":"Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir Regimen for Mild/Moderately Severe COVID-19: A Rapid Review With Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis.","authors":"George N Okoli, Nicole Askin, Rasheda Rabbani","doi":"10.1370/afm.3120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of the approved nirmatrelvir/ritonavir regimen for treatment of laboratory-confirmed mild/moderately severe COVID-19 remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world studies (RWS; observational studies) of the efficacy/effectiveness and/or safety of the approved nirmatrelvir/ritonavir regimen for COVID-19. We pooled appropriate data (adjusted estimates for RWS) using an inverse variance, random-effects model. We calculated statistical heterogeneity using the <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> statistic. Results are presented as relative risk (RR) with associated 95% CI. We further assessed risk of bias/study quality and conducted trial sequential analysis of the evidence from RCTs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 4 RCTs (4,070 persons) and 16 RWS (1,925,047 persons) of adults (aged ≥18 years). One and 3 RCTs were of low and unclear risk of bias, respectively. The RWS were of good quality. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir significantly decreased COVID-19 hospitalization compared with placebo/no treatment (RR = 0.17; 95% CI, 0.10-0.31; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 77.2%; 2 RCTs, 3,542 persons), but there was no significant difference for decrease of worsening severity (RR = 0.82; 95% CI, 0.66-1.01; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 47.5%; 3 RCTs, 1,824 persons), viral clearance (RR = 1.19; 95% CI, 0.93-1.51; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 82%; 2 RCTs, 528 persons), adverse events (RR = 1.41; 95% CI, 0.92-2.14; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 70.6%; 4 RCTs, 4,070 persons), serious adverse events (RR = 0.82; 95% CI, 0.41-1.62; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%; 3 RCTs, 3,806 persons), and all-cause mortality (RR = 0.27; 95% CI, 0.04-1.70; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 49.9%; 3 RCTs, 3,806 persons), although trial sequential analysis suggested that the current total sample sizes for these outcomes were not large enough for conclusions to be drawn. Real-world studies also showed significantly decreased COVID-19 hospitalization (RR = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.37-0.60; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 95.0%; 11 RWS, 1,421,398 persons) and all-cause mortality (RR = 0.24; 95% CI, 0.14-0.34; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 65%; 7 RWS, 286,131 persons) for nirmatrelvir/ritonavir compared with no treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir appears to be promising for preventing hospitalization and potentially decreasing all-cause mortality for persons with mild/moderately severe COVID-19, but the evidence is weak. More studies are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":50973,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Family Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11268681/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.3120","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of the approved nirmatrelvir/ritonavir regimen for treatment of laboratory-confirmed mild/moderately severe COVID-19 remains unclear.

Methods: We systematically identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world studies (RWS; observational studies) of the efficacy/effectiveness and/or safety of the approved nirmatrelvir/ritonavir regimen for COVID-19. We pooled appropriate data (adjusted estimates for RWS) using an inverse variance, random-effects model. We calculated statistical heterogeneity using the I 2 statistic. Results are presented as relative risk (RR) with associated 95% CI. We further assessed risk of bias/study quality and conducted trial sequential analysis of the evidence from RCTs.

Results: We included 4 RCTs (4,070 persons) and 16 RWS (1,925,047 persons) of adults (aged ≥18 years). One and 3 RCTs were of low and unclear risk of bias, respectively. The RWS were of good quality. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir significantly decreased COVID-19 hospitalization compared with placebo/no treatment (RR = 0.17; 95% CI, 0.10-0.31; I 2 = 77.2%; 2 RCTs, 3,542 persons), but there was no significant difference for decrease of worsening severity (RR = 0.82; 95% CI, 0.66-1.01; I 2 = 47.5%; 3 RCTs, 1,824 persons), viral clearance (RR = 1.19; 95% CI, 0.93-1.51; I 2 = 82%; 2 RCTs, 528 persons), adverse events (RR = 1.41; 95% CI, 0.92-2.14; I 2 = 70.6%; 4 RCTs, 4,070 persons), serious adverse events (RR = 0.82; 95% CI, 0.41-1.62; I 2 = 0%; 3 RCTs, 3,806 persons), and all-cause mortality (RR = 0.27; 95% CI, 0.04-1.70; I 2 = 49.9%; 3 RCTs, 3,806 persons), although trial sequential analysis suggested that the current total sample sizes for these outcomes were not large enough for conclusions to be drawn. Real-world studies also showed significantly decreased COVID-19 hospitalization (RR = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.37-0.60; I 2 = 95.0%; 11 RWS, 1,421,398 persons) and all-cause mortality (RR = 0.24; 95% CI, 0.14-0.34; I 2 = 65%; 7 RWS, 286,131 persons) for nirmatrelvir/ritonavir compared with no treatment.

Conclusions: Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir appears to be promising for preventing hospitalization and potentially decreasing all-cause mortality for persons with mild/moderately severe COVID-19, but the evidence is weak. More studies are needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于轻度/中度严重 COVID-19 的 Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 方案:带有 Meta 分析和试验序列分析的快速回顾。
背景已获批准的尼尔马特韦/利托那韦方案治疗实验室确诊的轻度/中度重度 COVID-19 的疗效、有效性和安全性仍不明确:我们系统地确定了已获批准的奈瑞韦/利托那韦方案治疗 COVID-19 的疗效/有效性和/或安全性的随机对照试验 (RCT) 和真实世界研究 (RWS;观察性研究)。我们采用反方差随机效应模型汇集了适当的数据(RWS 的调整估计值)。我们使用 I 2 统计量计算统计异质性。结果以相对风险 (RR) 及相关的 95% CI 表示。我们进一步评估了偏倚风险/研究质量,并对来自 RCT 的证据进行了试验序列分析:我们纳入了针对成人(年龄≥18 岁)的 4 项 RCT(4,070 人)和 16 项 RWS(1,925,047 人)。分别有 1 项和 3 项研究性试验存在低偏倚风险和不明确偏倚风险。RWS质量良好。与安慰剂/不治疗相比,Nirmatrelvir/利托那韦能显著降低COVID-19的住院率(RR = 0.17; 95% CI, 0.10-0.31; I 2 = 77.2%; 2项研究,3,542人),但在降低恶化严重程度方面没有显著差异(RR = 0.82;95% CI,0.66-1.01;I 2 = 47.5%;3 项 RCT,1 824 人)、病毒清除率(RR = 1.19;95% CI,0.93-1.51;I 2 = 82%;2 项 RCT,528 人)、不良事件(RR = 1.41;95% CI,0.92-2.14;I 2 = 70.6%;4 项 RCT,4070 人)、严重不良事件(RR = 0.82;95% CI,0.41-1.62;I 2 = 0%;3 项 RCT,3806 人)和全因死亡率(RR = 0.27;95% CI,0.04-1.70;I 2 = 49.9%;3 项 RCT,3806 人),但试验顺序分析表明,目前这些结果的总样本量还不足以得出结论。真实世界研究还显示,与不治疗相比,尼马瑞韦/利托那韦的COVID-19住院率(RR=0.48;95% CI,0.37-0.60;I 2=95.0%;11个RWS,1,421,398人)和全因死亡率(RR=0.24;95% CI,0.14-0.34;I 2=65%;7个RWS,286,131人)显著降低:结论:对于轻度/中度重度 COVID-19 患者,尼马瑞韦/利托那韦似乎有望预防住院并降低全因死亡率,但证据尚不充分。还需要更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Family Medicine
Annals of Family Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
142
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals of Family Medicine is a peer-reviewed research journal to meet the needs of scientists, practitioners, policymakers, and the patients and communities they serve.
期刊最新文献
Prehospital Clinical Decision-Making for Medication Administration for Behavioral Emergencies. Rapid Antigen Testing in School Health Offices for Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza A. Assessment and comparison of the ILI case definition in clinical and school-based community settings: ORCHARDS/IISP. Efficacy and Safety of BB-12 Supplemented Strawberry Yogurt For Healthy Children on Antibiotics (PLAY ON). Exploratory Pilot Studies to Demonstrate Mechanisms of Preventing Antibiotic-Associated Diarrhea and the Role for Probiotics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1