Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients with and without Diabetes Mellitus.

Hüseyin Ayhan, Murat Can Güney, Telat Keleş, Engin Bozkurt
{"title":"Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients with and without Diabetes Mellitus.","authors":"Hüseyin Ayhan, Murat Can Güney, Telat Keleş, Engin Bozkurt","doi":"10.21470/1678-9741-2023-0088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Diabetes mellitus (DM) in patients undergoing cardiac transcatheter or surgical interventions usually is correlated with poor outcomes. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been developed as a therapy choice for inoperable, high-, or intermediate-risk surgical patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of DM and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) on outcomes and survival after TAVI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five hundred and fifty-two symptomatic severe AS patients who underwent TAVI, of whom 164 (29.7%) had DM, were included in this retrospective study. Follow-up was performed after 30 days, six months, and annually.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The device success and risks of procedural-related complications were similar between patients with and without DM, except for acute kidney injury, which was more frequent in the DM group (2.4% vs. 0%, P=0.021). In-hospital and first-year mortality were similar between the groups (4.9% vs. 3.6%, P=0.490 and 15.0% vs. 11.2%, P=0.282, respectively). There was a statistical difference between HbA1c ≥ 6.5 and HbA1c ≤ 6.49 groups in total mortality (34.4% vs. 15.8%, P<0.001, respectively). The only independent predictors were Society of Thoracic Surgeons score (hazard ratio [HR] 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-1.51; P=0.003) and HbA1c level ≥ 6.5 (HR 10.78, 95% CI 2.58-21.50; P=0.003) in multivariable logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, we conclude that DM was not correlated with an increased mortality risk or complication rates after TAVI. Also, it was shown that mortality was higher in patients with HbA1c ≥ 6.5, and it was an independent predictor for long-term mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":72457,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11259225/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2023-0088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Diabetes mellitus (DM) in patients undergoing cardiac transcatheter or surgical interventions usually is correlated with poor outcomes. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been developed as a therapy choice for inoperable, high-, or intermediate-risk surgical patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS).

Objective: To evaluate the impact of DM and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) on outcomes and survival after TAVI.

Methods: Five hundred and fifty-two symptomatic severe AS patients who underwent TAVI, of whom 164 (29.7%) had DM, were included in this retrospective study. Follow-up was performed after 30 days, six months, and annually.

Results: The device success and risks of procedural-related complications were similar between patients with and without DM, except for acute kidney injury, which was more frequent in the DM group (2.4% vs. 0%, P=0.021). In-hospital and first-year mortality were similar between the groups (4.9% vs. 3.6%, P=0.490 and 15.0% vs. 11.2%, P=0.282, respectively). There was a statistical difference between HbA1c ≥ 6.5 and HbA1c ≤ 6.49 groups in total mortality (34.4% vs. 15.8%, P<0.001, respectively). The only independent predictors were Society of Thoracic Surgeons score (hazard ratio [HR] 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-1.51; P=0.003) and HbA1c level ≥ 6.5 (HR 10.78, 95% CI 2.58-21.50; P=0.003) in multivariable logistic regression analysis.

Conclusion: In this study, we conclude that DM was not correlated with an increased mortality risk or complication rates after TAVI. Also, it was shown that mortality was higher in patients with HbA1c ≥ 6.5, and it was an independent predictor for long-term mortality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者经导管主动脉瓣植入术的疗效。
导言:接受心脏经导管或外科手术治疗的患者中,糖尿病(DM)通常与不良预后相关。经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)已成为严重主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)无法手术、高风险或中风险手术患者的治疗选择:评估糖尿病和血红蛋白A1c(HbA1c)对TAVI术后疗效和存活率的影响:这项回顾性研究共纳入了552名接受TAVI手术的无症状重度AS患者,其中164人(29.7%)患有糖尿病。分别在30天后、6个月后和每年进行一次随访:除急性肾损伤在糖尿病组更为常见(2.4% 对 0%,P=0.021)外,有糖尿病和无糖尿病患者的设备成功率和手术相关并发症风险相似。两组患者的院内死亡率和第一年死亡率相似(分别为 4.9% 对 3.6%,P=0.490;15.0% 对 11.2%,P=0.282)。在总死亡率方面,HbA1c ≥ 6.5 组和 HbA1c ≤ 6.49 组之间存在统计学差异(34.4% 对 15.8%,P=0.490):在这项研究中,我们得出结论,DM 与 TAVI 术后死亡率或并发症发生率的增加无关。此外,研究还表明,HbA1c≥6.5的患者死亡率更高,而且它是长期死亡率的独立预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Usefulness of Microcirculatory Assessment After Cardiac Surgery: Illustrative Case Report. Risk Model for Laryngeal Complications Prediction in Chinese PatientGBVs After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. Artificial Intelligence in the Hands of Perfusionists: Revolutionizing Cardiopulmonary Bypass. Assessment of EuroSCORE II and STS Score Performance and the Impact of Surgical Urgency in Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery at a Referral Center in São Paulo, Brazil. Comparison of the Effect of Pump Flow Type (Pulsatile or Non-Pulsatile) on Postoperative Neurocognitive Functions in Coronary Artery Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1