What do people with intellectual disabilities, their family members and paid carers understand about psychotropic medication? A rapid review

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities Pub Date : 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1111/jar.13283
Dawn E. Cavanagh, Sue Caton, Jodie Rawles, Katherine Runswick-Cole, Chris Hatton, Umesh Chauhan, Christine Hutchinson
{"title":"What do people with intellectual disabilities, their family members and paid carers understand about psychotropic medication? A rapid review","authors":"Dawn E. Cavanagh,&nbsp;Sue Caton,&nbsp;Jodie Rawles,&nbsp;Katherine Runswick-Cole,&nbsp;Chris Hatton,&nbsp;Umesh Chauhan,&nbsp;Christine Hutchinson","doi":"10.1111/jar.13283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>People with intellectual disabilities are more likely to be prescribed psychotropic medication than the general population and are frequently prescribed multiple medications. Understanding people with intellectual disabilities and carer perspectives is essential to improving the quality of psychotropic medication prescribing and usage.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>A rapid review explored people with intellectual disabilities' understanding of psychotropic medications, as well as family members and paid carers, and how this understanding can be improved.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-one journal articles were included. Lack of understanding of medication was universal, with participants often unaware of adverse effects, alternatives, and rights around medication. There was also a lack of involvement in decision making for all participants. Some interventions aimed at people with intellectual disabilities or paid carers helped to improve knowledge.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Evaluating how best to improve psychotropic medication understanding for people with intellectual disabilities, family members and paid carers should be a focus for future research.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51403,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jar.13283","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jar.13283","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

People with intellectual disabilities are more likely to be prescribed psychotropic medication than the general population and are frequently prescribed multiple medications. Understanding people with intellectual disabilities and carer perspectives is essential to improving the quality of psychotropic medication prescribing and usage.

Method

A rapid review explored people with intellectual disabilities' understanding of psychotropic medications, as well as family members and paid carers, and how this understanding can be improved.

Results

Twenty-one journal articles were included. Lack of understanding of medication was universal, with participants often unaware of adverse effects, alternatives, and rights around medication. There was also a lack of involvement in decision making for all participants. Some interventions aimed at people with intellectual disabilities or paid carers helped to improve knowledge.

Conclusion

Evaluating how best to improve psychotropic medication understanding for people with intellectual disabilities, family members and paid carers should be a focus for future research.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
智障人士、其家人和有偿照护者对精神药物了解多少?快速回顾。
背景:与普通人相比,智障人士更有可能被处方精神药物,而且经常被处方多种药物。了解智障人士和照护者的观点对于提高精神药物处方和使用的质量至关重要:方法:快速综述了智障人士、家庭成员和有偿照护者对精神药物的理解,以及如何改善这种理解:结果:共收录了 21 篇期刊文章。对药物缺乏了解是普遍现象,参与者往往不了解药物的不良反应、替代品和权利。此外,所有参与者都缺乏对决策的参与。一些针对智障人士或有偿照护者的干预措施有助于提高他们对药物的认识:评估如何以最佳方式提高智障人士、家庭成员和有偿照护者对精神药物的了解应成为未来研究的重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: JARID is an international, peer-reviewed journal which draws together findings derived from original applied research in intellectual disabilities. The journal is an important forum for the dissemination of ideas to promote valued lifestyles for people with intellectual disabilities. It reports on research from the UK and overseas by authors from all relevant professional disciplines. It is aimed at an international, multi-disciplinary readership. Topics covered include community living, quality of life, challenging behaviour, communication, sexuality, medication, ageing, supported employment, family issues, mental health, physical health, autism, economic issues, social networks, staff stress, staff training, epidemiology and service provision.
期刊最新文献
Concurrent Validity of Abbreviated Walk Tests Among Adults With Mild to Moderate Intellectual Disability Adapting Complicated Grief Therapy for Use With People With Intellectual Disabilities: An Action Research Study Correction to “‘A Potentially Ticking Time Bomb’—Barriers for Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease in People With Intellectual Disabilities” Using a Capability Approach to Explore How People With Intellectual Disabilities Can Lead Flourishing Lives ‘It's Not Like a One-Way Street’: Using Photovoice to Understand How College Students With Intellectual Disability Experience Interdependence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1